XJ XJ8 / XJR ( X308 ) 1997 - 2003

98 Jag Engines-All Bad?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-23-2008 | 06:56 AM
wjgesq's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Default 98 Jag Engines-All Bad?


There is a lot of bad news out there re the 98 8 cylinder models. Something about the materials used in the engine. Are all these bad? If you have not had trouble by 64K miles, are they likely to surface?
 
  #2  
Old 03-23-2008 | 07:15 AM
FactoryJaguarTech's Avatar
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,961
Likes: 86
From: 33498
Default RE: 98 Jag Engines-All Bad?

If you can have a compression test done would be best way to tell if engine is worn. If it starts well and has no rattles, you should be fine.
 
  #3  
Old 03-24-2008 | 12:12 PM
ken@britishparts.com's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,533
Likes: 22
From: Houston, Texas
Default RE: 98 Jag Engines-All Bad?

You will hear a lot of complaints about the Nichsil liner of the cylinders. To be honest, we don't see lots of problems with these. The big culprit is the timing tensioners. If you hear a rattle at start up, shut it down and fix the car pronto.
 
  #4  
Old 03-24-2008 | 03:40 PM
skanoski's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 327
Likes: 1
From: Philly
Default RE: 98 Jag Engines-All Bad?

while we're on the 98 Nikasil issue.....my 98 XJR has over 130,000 with the original, Nikasil-lined engine. Apparently the Nikasil lining gets chewed up by high sulfur fuels - not a big issue now with most fuel being extremely low in sulfur.
my question is....does the Nikasil lining wear out faster with normal wear and tear, or is it more of an "all or none" issue with sulfur exposure? I'm wondering if I should expect a short life for my engine, or perhaps I'm in the clear. Anyone know how Nikasil lining holds up when sulfur is not an issue?
 
  #5  
Old 03-24-2008 | 05:24 PM
jag_genius's Avatar
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,076
Likes: 39
From: Pompino Beach , FL
Default RE: 98 Jag Engines-All Bad?

xjr engine are normally better and outlast the naturally aspirated... if the gasoline is really low in sulfur.. and is high quality.. and you don't make frequent stops in the cold with out letting the engine warm up.. and your battery is always up to snuff.then you shud have no problems..
 
  #6  
Old 03-24-2008 | 05:34 PM
ken@britishparts.com's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,533
Likes: 22
From: Houston, Texas
Default RE: 98 Jag Engines-All Bad?

I'm with the Jag genius on this one. Don't sweat the Nikasil issue.
 
  #7  
Old 03-25-2008 | 12:45 AM
The_Ikon's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 532
Likes: 46
From: MS
Default RE: 98 Jag Engines-All Bad?

I have overwell over140K on my 98 XJ8L engine and it is still purring!!! Now that tranny is another issue for me![]
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Wolfy
XJ ( X351 )
58
05-28-2024 08:06 AM
allenman85
F-Type ( X152 )
14
05-10-2021 03:11 PM
PMKimpton
X-Type ( X400 )
15
08-03-2019 08:22 PM
Rick Michael
New Member Area - Intro a MUST
7
09-06-2015 06:53 PM
edtexas
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
5
09-05-2015 10:49 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: 98 Jag Engines-All Bad?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:49 PM.