XJ XJ8 / XJR ( X308 ) 1997 - 2003

BH Performance Headers Being Installed!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 09-12-2012, 08:14 AM
SteveM's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 684
Received 97 Likes on 69 Posts
Default

There were a bunch of pictures on BIP's Facebook page.
 
Attached Thumbnails BH Performance Headers Being Installed!!!-35928_10150878135985017_1503931457_n.jpg   BH Performance Headers Being Installed!!!-304587_10151040009490017_377485829_n.jpg   BH Performance Headers Being Installed!!!-181836_10150868216680017_1178887293_n.jpg   BH Performance Headers Being Installed!!!-527087_10151040008430017_556751558_n.jpg   BH Performance Headers Being Installed!!!-533045_10150868216725017_33869352_n.jpg  

BH Performance Headers Being Installed!!!-536401_10150878135745017_77612216_n.jpg   BH Performance Headers Being Installed!!!-537586_10150868216915017_1699540897_n.jpg   BH Performance Headers Being Installed!!!-550750_10150878135815017_1091405249_n.jpg   BH Performance Headers Being Installed!!!-553546_10150868216595017_1800061062_n.jpg   BH Performance Headers Being Installed!!!-484273_10150878135660017_2054680062_n.jpg  

BH Performance Headers Being Installed!!!-544808_10150878135505017_1682298591_n.jpg  
The following users liked this post:
User 070620 (01-29-2013)
  #22  
Old 09-12-2012, 11:08 AM
sbreeden's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Easton, PA
Posts: 252
Received 39 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

In the first picture, if that is of a XJR, it seems to close to the transmision bell housing, transmission temp is going to rise. NOT GOOD!!. Going to need a heat sink for that mod.
 
  #23  
Old 09-12-2012, 07:41 PM
XJR Prototype's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Grove City, Ohio
Posts: 366
Received 33 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Link to picture of dyno graph.. don't know if it's this car or not...

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?f...type=1&theater
 
  #24  
Old 09-12-2012, 07:51 PM
ecw's Avatar
ecw
ecw is offline
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 62
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

40 hp gain is nice. Would have liked to have seen a dyno with cats.
 
  #25  
Old 09-13-2012, 09:44 AM
Viapa's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Atlanta GA/Jacksonville FL
Posts: 134
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ecw
40 hp gain is nice. Would have liked to have seen a dyno with cats.
You will. That information will be available either today or tommorrow.
 
  #26  
Old 09-13-2012, 10:14 AM
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 8,638
Received 4,454 Likes on 2,426 Posts
Default

I'm glad to hear it!

Pretty sure you won't be putting the OEM cats back on so in the interests of accuracy please be sure to show the exact details of the cats fitted; brand, cell count, diameter of inlet/outlet and the diameter of the housing.

And of course pictures!
 
The following users liked this post:
Rlover (09-25-2012)
  #27  
Old 09-13-2012, 01:03 PM
Viapa's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Atlanta GA/Jacksonville FL
Posts: 134
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by XJR Prototype
Link to picture of dyno graph.. don't know if it's this car or not...

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?f...type=1&theater
It's this XJR.
 
  #28  
Old 09-19-2012, 12:04 AM
WaterDragon's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Los Gatos, CA
Posts: 1,761
Received 279 Likes on 194 Posts
Default

I understand things generaly take much longer than planned, but Any progress on adding a set of street legal cats?
 
  #29  
Old 09-21-2012, 08:56 PM
WaterDragon's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Los Gatos, CA
Posts: 1,761
Received 279 Likes on 194 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Viapa
You will. That information will be available either today or tommorrow.
Any progress?
 
  #30  
Old 09-22-2012, 03:05 PM
adam699's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 824
Received 84 Likes on 71 Posts
Default

Is it just me or are these guys just great at missing deadlines. I mean I like what they post and when they post, but they either over-promise and under-deliver or their guy in charge of Forums/PR is just bad. I hope they are better at keeping their customers in the "loop" as to how long things realistically take.

In this case, I'm starting to think that after fitting in cats they had no gains to post?.
 
  #31  
Old 09-24-2012, 09:10 PM
WaterDragon's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Los Gatos, CA
Posts: 1,761
Received 279 Likes on 194 Posts
Default

OK, I'm calling it...

Time of death 7:09 p.m. Monday, September 24, 2012

BP's quest for posting header dynos still showing gains with street legal cats is now officially dead.....
...unless proven otherwise
 
  #32  
Old 09-25-2012, 01:12 AM
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 8,638
Received 4,454 Likes on 2,426 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by adam699
....I'm starting to think that after fitting in cats they had no gains to post?.
This was always the risk, or at least relatively low gains, which could not justify the costs...hope we are wrong!
 
  #33  
Old 09-25-2012, 09:56 AM
SteveM's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 684
Received 97 Likes on 69 Posts
Default

They have an update in the S type thread, which ironically doesn't have much in common fitment-wise. Completely different chassis and it would be only shear luck if the headers fit the S type.
 
  #34  
Old 09-25-2012, 11:05 AM
WaterDragon's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Los Gatos, CA
Posts: 1,761
Received 279 Likes on 194 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SteveM
They have an update in the S type thread, which ironically doesn't have much in common fitment-wise. Completely different chassis and it would be only shear luck if the headers fit the S type.
What that post said was that they would post the results with cats tomorrow, but if past performance can predict future Buckhead performance, by tomorrow, they do not mean the next calendar day, so we still have no idea when they will post dyno gains with cats....
 
  #35  
Old 09-25-2012, 11:21 AM
avos's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,616
Received 1,067 Likes on 761 Posts
Default

Besides that, they haven't answered the question yet why the base dyno of the catless version was about 40 hp down, thats just as important to get some creditibility on the dyno runs they make. Don't get me wrong, would also love to see good gains.
 
  #36  
Old 09-25-2012, 11:28 AM
WaterDragon's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Los Gatos, CA
Posts: 1,761
Received 279 Likes on 194 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by avos
Besides that, they haven't answered the question yet why the base dyno of the catless version was about 40 hp down, thats just as important to get some creditibility on the dyno runs they make. Don't get me wrong, would also love to see good gains.
Agreed, the baseline run numbers must be justified, especially if they are on the lower side, to be credible.

But I think we will see a gain of certainly no more than 20 hp, if even that with the cats installed. Starting with a 40 hp gain without cats sets the absolute limit to 40 hp- losses from cats, so the dollars to hp ratio must start climbing...
 
  #37  
Old 09-25-2012, 11:39 AM
avos's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,616
Received 1,067 Likes on 761 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by WaterDragon
Agreed, the baseline run numbers must be justified, especially if they are on the lower side, to be credible.

But I think we will see a gain of certainly no more than 20 hp, if even that with the cats installed. Starting with a 40 hp gain without cats sets the absolute limit to 40 hp- losses from cats, so the dollars to hp ratio must start climbing...
Don't know, from what I have learned you need to size the length and id of the tubes very well for the application to get the gains, so it might work better for one setup then another. Am curious though at what is possible, so I hope they will answer the questions to come to more credible results, but it’s already 1 week since I have asked.
 
  #38  
Old 09-25-2012, 05:40 PM
JaguarXJR02's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Virginia
Posts: 663
Received 104 Likes on 79 Posts
Default

they put up a new dyno sheet on buckhead's facebook earlier. car got 339.7 with "200 cell high-flow cats"
 
  #39  
Old 09-25-2012, 07:33 PM
WaterDragon's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Los Gatos, CA
Posts: 1,761
Received 279 Likes on 194 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JaguarXJR02
they put up a new dyno sheet on buckhead's facebook earlier. car got 339.7 with "200 cell high-flow cats"
So what was the before dyno?

Therefore the gain with cats was?
 
  #40  
Old 09-25-2012, 08:44 PM
JaguarXJR02's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Virginia
Posts: 663
Received 104 Likes on 79 Posts
Default

jaguar original exhaust manifold: 306.7
buckhead headers without cats: 346.3
buckhead headers with cats: 339.7

headers gain with cats fitted: 33 horsepower, or about a 10.76% gain in horsepower
so basically the cats lost them about 6 horsepower, not bad. comparing cats and no cats, cats only cost them 1.91% decrease in power
 

Last edited by JaguarXJR02; 09-25-2012 at 08:49 PM.


Quick Reply: BH Performance Headers Being Installed!!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:21 AM.