XJ XJ8 / XJR ( X308 ) 1997 - 2003

Cat Con Remove

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 12-30-2016, 11:14 AM
benIzzie's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 31
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Cat Con Remove

Hello (my first post) ...

I have a 98 VP, and I removed cats, redid exhaust, added performance muffler, and 3.5x18 resonator tips.

Any advice on defeating the O2 sensor issue -- it runs and sound GREAT, but it is supper rich, and as my mechanic friend says, "she dumps fuel like a boat, but what a sound" ...
 
  #2  
Old 12-30-2016, 03:25 PM
RJ237's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Douglasville Ga.
Posts: 8,682
Received 2,801 Likes on 2,236 Posts
The following users liked this post:
benIzzie (12-30-2016)
  #3  
Old 12-30-2016, 03:52 PM
benIzzie's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 31
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Dude, ... Thnx . !


Lance
 
  #4  
Old 12-30-2016, 04:06 PM
avern1's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Winchester, CA
Posts: 3,290
Received 1,319 Likes on 1,004 Posts
Default

You need to reinstall the cats. They don't effect exhaust or sound but have a big impact on the engine performance. Without them the ECU has no idea what the engine is doing.
Not only are you wasting fuel but quite possibly causing some serious damage with the excess fueling
If you are concerned about performance maybe try Nameless Cat free flow and you get back monitoring. Without the info from the Cats your probably losing horsepower and definitely efficiency.
 
The following users liked this post:
benIzzie (12-30-2016)
  #5  
Old 12-30-2016, 04:34 PM
benIzzie's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 31
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thnx, ... but I have to ask, as I have several mechanics (certified / good ones) tell me that the issue is the reading of the "downwind" O2 sensors, and a person can use a few different means to change the reading on the downwind, ... either capacitors, or even 'mini-defeaters that actually have a lil chamber w/ a rhodium element to make the change ...?

Thnx Agin,

Lance
 
  #6  
Old 12-30-2016, 06:43 PM
RJ237's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Douglasville Ga.
Posts: 8,682
Received 2,801 Likes on 2,236 Posts
Default

The way I understand it, those simulators will provide the ECU with a mid range voltage indicating the missing cat is performing efficiently.

But Vern has a point, in that high flow cats will not reduce power noticeably.
 
The following users liked this post:
benIzzie (01-02-2017)
  #7  
Old 12-31-2016, 09:16 AM
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Wise County,TX
Posts: 12,128
Received 8,106 Likes on 4,891 Posts
Default

I don't think I want to participate in this discussion. The law regarding pollution devices mentions disabling, deleting or CAUSING the deletion or disabling of any device................

I don't want some gov't bureaucrat accusing me of some lawlessness because I typed ways to do so. The EPA is a bunch of control freaks that look for excuses to make examples out of minor infractions.

Not saying that they read this forum but................I don't trust gov't.

I think you are talking about your 'off-road' race car anyway, RIGHT?

bob
 
The following users liked this post:
benIzzie (01-02-2017)
  #8  
Old 12-31-2016, 11:49 AM
RJ237's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Douglasville Ga.
Posts: 8,682
Received 2,801 Likes on 2,236 Posts
Default

That's what it says in the ad for the device, not for road use. Just because there is no state testing doesn't mean it's okay. A high flow cat is a better choice.
 
The following users liked this post:
benIzzie (01-02-2017)
  #9  
Old 12-31-2016, 11:55 AM
nilanium's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: MD, USA
Posts: 1,421
Received 492 Likes on 374 Posts
Default

I'll start off by saying I don't have much experience with engine tuning. However, in the threads I've read here about engine/performance mods, the o2 sensors are the last line of defense for the ECU. So, if the other sensors are reading improperly, the ECU will run off o2 measurements to prevent the engine from blowing up. Maybe someone who knows better can verify this. I wouldn't want to be sending a simulated signal for something which maintains safe operation...

I hate to be that guy, but sometimes "do it right" is the only answer, as others have mentioned already.
 
The following users liked this post:
benIzzie (01-02-2017)
  #10  
Old 01-01-2017, 02:38 AM
greverrr's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Mont Vernon, NH
Posts: 301
Received 104 Likes on 78 Posts
Default

Some don't condone it but if you aren't planning on adding cats............you could try distancing your downstream (rearmost) sensors from the exhaust stream via O2 bung spacers (aka spark plug non-foulers, you can buy at almost any auto store). Its a trick thats been used for years when bypassing Cats. Cheap and easy to try.
Are you getting "cat efficiency" codes or does it just stink/smell? Have you (or mechanic) observed your fuel trims? Were you having problems with the Cats prior to mods?
 
The following users liked this post:
benIzzie (01-02-2017)
  #11  
Old 01-01-2017, 09:51 AM
JagV8's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Yorkshire, England
Posts: 26,767
Received 4,531 Likes on 3,941 Posts
Default

You can probably adjust it to run leaner. Fairly easy to be too lean in some situations, without knowing, though.
 
The following users liked this post:
benIzzie (01-02-2017)
  #12  
Old 01-02-2017, 02:05 AM
andrew lowe's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: croydon uk
Posts: 1,996
Received 413 Likes on 318 Posts
Default

Maybe wrong, but I thought the '98s only had upstream co2 sensors!

If dumping too much fuel into the engine check the ECT sensor.
 
The following users liked this post:
benIzzie (01-02-2017)
  #13  
Old 01-02-2017, 02:44 AM
Addicted2boost's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 2,678
Received 1,069 Likes on 823 Posts
Default

The 98' XJ8 & XJR had downstream 02 sensors as well. The only difference the 98' downstream didn't have was a heater circuit and therefore was a 2 pin connector. The upstream did have a heater circuit.
 
The following users liked this post:
benIzzie (01-02-2017)
  #14  
Old 01-02-2017, 04:43 AM
greverrr's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Mont Vernon, NH
Posts: 301
Received 104 Likes on 78 Posts
Default

US cars 1996-present require an upstream and downstream O2 sensor for OBDII compliance. It is possible to have your ECU re-programmed to Euro2 spec which would only contain upstream sensors, like andrew is referring to.
 
The following 2 users liked this post by greverrr:
andrew lowe (01-03-2017), benIzzie (01-02-2017)
  #15  
Old 01-02-2017, 09:51 PM
benIzzie's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 31
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Okay, couple of things ...

I didn't "choose it" i shouldn't have said "removed them" cause I bought it from a North Carolina Junkyard, with Cats already removed, and when I went to my local SC Junk Yards, they told me don't need them here in SC -- so thanx for the heads up, cause I never even considered legality issues ...

I live in SC - No Emission Testing - So I left cats off / Great sound, but lack of back pressure killed bottom end, until I added Comp Mufflers to increase it.

Thnx for alll the great advice though
Lance
 
  #16  
Old 01-02-2017, 10:23 PM
benIzzie's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 31
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thnx, wasn't my intent to be off-point or illegal ...
 

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:11 AM.