Differences 305 vs. 325 mm brakes?
#1
Differences 305 vs. 325 mm brakes?
Hey guys,
So, with brakes, my X308 has yet again managed to 'warp' the discs so I'm looking into new discs.
Oddly, the 325 mm discs from TRW are cheaper than the standard 305 mm ones. Is the 325 setup then the R brake job or simply the same ATE brake caliper as the 305 with a different mounting bracket?
Cheers
Damien
So, with brakes, my X308 has yet again managed to 'warp' the discs so I'm looking into new discs.
Oddly, the 325 mm discs from TRW are cheaper than the standard 305 mm ones. Is the 325 setup then the R brake job or simply the same ATE brake caliper as the 305 with a different mounting bracket?
Cheers
Damien
#2
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Trying to escape Central Florida
Posts: 4,674
Received 1,794 Likes
on
1,316 Posts
I am working on converting to the 325 R's and initially the difference is obviously diameter and a bit thicker. I can tell you the discs studs mount the same. The R caliper is a different mount height wise and has dual pistons as opposed to a single on the 305.
Here's an old link for rotors I had...https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/x...rotors-123561/
....and one for the R calipers, member Luc is very experienced with this and the photobucket link I think will help you.... https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/x...wanted-128967/
Here's an old link for rotors I had...https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/x...rotors-123561/
....and one for the R calipers, member Luc is very experienced with this and the photobucket link I think will help you.... https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/x...wanted-128967/
#3
The following users liked this post:
Z07Brandon (11-13-2019)
#4
The following users liked this post:
vincent661983 (10-14-2020)
#5
#6
Can you still run 16" rims?
#7
I think I've been told 17's are the smallest that can be put on the 325 front setup, haven't tried it though.
I'm only seeing the PN for the caliper+carrier assy for the 305 and earlier 325mm calipers, while the F08336-on lists caliper and carrier separately. However the f08336-on caliper+carrier assy PN's line up with the earlier ones - 305 for non-SC, 325 for SC. Going off that assumption, for the caliper and carrier listed separately, the same caliper PN is used on the 305 and 325 options, while the carrier PN is different. That kind of makes sense since Rockauto lists the same brake pads for the front whether it is 305 or 235 rotors.
Using this for reference, usually follows Jaguar factory part numbers accurately: https://www.jaguarclassicparts.com/u...-caliper-front
I'm only seeing the PN for the caliper+carrier assy for the 305 and earlier 325mm calipers, while the F08336-on lists caliper and carrier separately. However the f08336-on caliper+carrier assy PN's line up with the earlier ones - 305 for non-SC, 325 for SC. Going off that assumption, for the caliper and carrier listed separately, the same caliper PN is used on the 305 and 325 options, while the carrier PN is different. That kind of makes sense since Rockauto lists the same brake pads for the front whether it is 305 or 235 rotors.
Using this for reference, usually follows Jaguar factory part numbers accurately: https://www.jaguarclassicparts.com/u...-caliper-front
Last edited by nilanium; 10-26-2017 at 11:45 PM.
Trending Topics
#8
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Trying to escape Central Florida
Posts: 4,674
Received 1,794 Likes
on
1,316 Posts
#9
#10
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Trying to escape Central Florida
Posts: 4,674
Received 1,794 Likes
on
1,316 Posts
#11
My R has the 325mm single piston discs/calipers. They still warp like a SOAB compared to the 305mm that are on my XK8. Having not tried it I would think if you simply replaced the front calipers and the front discs with the later 325mm set up you should be golden, I honestly don't think it is gonna make a big difference aside from maybe a slightly cooler disc because of more surface area but braking will be the same as the pads are the same.
#12
My R has the 325mm single piston discs/calipers. They still warp like a SOAB compared to the 305mm that are on my XK8. Having not tried it I would think if you simply replaced the front calipers and the front discs with the later 325mm set up you should be golden, I honestly don't think it is gonna make a big difference aside from maybe a slightly cooler disc because of more surface area but braking will be the same as the pads are the same.
The 325 mm can still brake better due to the position of where the pads contact. Remeber leverage... It may only be 10 mm further outwards (radius) but that can be enough to up the stopping force - larger surface area for a pad to contact before touching the same area again. Friction = speed reduction. Warmth = reduction of friction. That added to a lever a little longer and the brakes can stay cooler. Thrus my little 3.2l won't need the same braking as the larger engines
#13
All it says it 'direct fit'. Obiously. But not what parts are needed. The photobucket links also don't work Still thanks for that link, though it only says what Jaguar Classkc Parts says. Though it does not say: if the calipers are the same or if the bracket is the same. Going by common sense and seeing that the bracket already sits close to the dksc, that will need to be replaced...
#14
That's quite a history of warped rotors. If its not driving style; then check your calipers and pad wear for even wear/stiffness.
My 98xjr had braking issue (305mm disks), directly related to played calipers and enthusiastic driving habits... Prompting an upgrade to R1 calipers and rotors.
My 98xjr had braking issue (305mm disks), directly related to played calipers and enthusiastic driving habits... Prompting an upgrade to R1 calipers and rotors.
#15
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Trying to escape Central Florida
Posts: 4,674
Received 1,794 Likes
on
1,316 Posts
All it says it 'direct fit'. Obiously. But not what parts are needed. The photobucket links also don't work Still thanks for that link, though it only says what Jaguar Classkc Parts says. Though it does not say: if the calipers are the same or if the bracket is the same. Going by common sense and seeing that the bracket already sits close to the dksc, that will need to be replaced...
The following users liked this post:
Highhorse (11-05-2017)
#17
Hello, rekindling the ol' 305 vs 325 brakes. Proud warper of discs here, 305s (Mintex). I did read all the posts (and recommended links) but I don't seem to find the answer, maybe you guys could please clarify...
So case in point is a 1998 x308, vin starting with 856, 17" Celtic Alloy wheels. My questions are:
1. Would the 325 disc fit the wheel ?
2. Do I need to change the calliper (in relation to the disc and/or wheel) ?
3. Is it worth moving to performance parts such as this one or this one?
Many thanks for your patience and help!
So case in point is a 1998 x308, vin starting with 856, 17" Celtic Alloy wheels. My questions are:
1. Would the 325 disc fit the wheel ?
2. Do I need to change the calliper (in relation to the disc and/or wheel) ?
3. Is it worth moving to performance parts such as this one or this one?
Many thanks for your patience and help!
#20
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Trying to escape Central Florida
Posts: 4,674
Received 1,794 Likes
on
1,316 Posts
I can say the stud pattern is the same, I have 325's waiting to go on mine when I get my R rotors refurbed and I did put them on the spindle to check clearance with my Penta wheels.
The existing caliper won't fit, it doesn't have long enough legs.
Performance rotors are a personal choice, just remember there are cheap and quality performance. Me, I went with what Jag specced for the R rotor.
The existing caliper won't fit, it doesn't have long enough legs.
Performance rotors are a personal choice, just remember there are cheap and quality performance. Me, I went with what Jag specced for the R rotor.