XJ XJ8 / XJR ( X308 ) 1997 - 2003

Radical Computerectomy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 10-31-2017, 09:07 AM
Sean B's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sunny Southport UK
Posts: 4,781
Received 1,362 Likes on 1,071 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Doomer
I would imagine others have been down this road?

Yes of course, there's a number of threads on swapping engines, but before you do that get a set of compressions to check if there are compromised cylinder liners. If it takes a long time to crank before ignition, that's a sign and also oil in the induction tube/TB, generally the top end of the engine is too oily on a failed Nik unit. Another thing to check is the timing chain tensioners/guides as early units have plastic parts that fail. Pulling a cam cover will confirm which you have fitted, hopefully they'll have been updated to medal. Along with this, the plastic T stat housing is another item to update to metal.

An OBD reader is a great way of locating and fixing things so that's a priority, many are using the ELM 327 OBD reader, all you're after is the codes & fuel trims.

I'm not sure but are the 2 cars different models in AJ26/27 engines? Or do they have the same engine?
 
  #22  
Old 10-31-2017, 06:11 PM
Doomer's Avatar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 27
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default A Question !

I feel kind of funny answering a question here, since I'm in the company of people who know volumes more than my few days of research have taught me, but it is my understanding that some time after my '99 was made, Jag started putting iron liners in the blocks. They call those the AJ28 engines. I will do a compression check. My car starts right away, no delay. I guess the restricted performance mode could be caused by the transmission problem (A-drum). I was also warned by a veteran X308 owner that vacuum lines on the throttle body are frequent gremlins. Thanks for the heads up on the code reader, I'll check that one out. My main worry is in getting something that doesn't support Jaguar.
 
  #23  
Old 07-23-2018, 12:27 PM
Count Iblis's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: 'Out West', USA
Posts: 660
Received 295 Likes on 163 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Doomer
Count Iblis:

So is the fact that the cams are ground for use with VVT what makes the big difference? In other words, if a non-VVT grind were run in fixed mode, could most of that 12% be made up?

I am curious because VVT has the reputation (among gear heads) for being an "emissions gadget" that can't compete with a fixed cam with a "real" performance grind. The VVT seems like it is easy to control, with only a solenoid valve regulating the engine oil to the VVT piston. Also, it seems that this is something that can be experimented with without risking damage to the engine if I get it wrong. Unlike an error in transmission clutch or air fuel ratio control, which can cause catastrophic damage, a VVT control error will just hurt power.

Instead of fixing the cams, I think I'll experiment with a VVT controller.
Sorry I missed this question- its NOT the cam design- its the vvt changing the phasing that gives a HUGE low speed torque benefit and often a power benefit also.

Specifically its the intake valve closing point, mainly, or IVC, at low speeds you want to close it early, at higher speeds you want to close it later. Its true that the cam profiles NEED to be optimized for the use of VVT- typically the optimal duration comes down about 10-20 degs.
 
The following users liked this post:
Panthro (03-24-2019)

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:25 PM.