XJ XJ8 / XJR ( X308 ) 1997 - 2003

Rev Limiter?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 08-26-2010, 08:58 AM
SteveM's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 685
Received 97 Likes on 69 Posts
Default Rev Limiter?

When does the rev limiter cut in on a 99 XJR? Is it at 6150 rpm or a little later?
 
  #2  
Old 08-26-2010, 09:54 AM
Sean B's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sunny Southport UK
Posts: 4,781
Received 1,363 Likes on 1,072 Posts
Default

I thought it was 5900 on S/C engines?
 
  #3  
Old 08-26-2010, 10:03 AM
SteveM's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 685
Received 97 Likes on 69 Posts
Default

Definitely not 5900. The factory numbers were 370 hp @ 6150 rpm so I'm assuming that it revs to at least 6150.
When I did my dyno runs, they ran it to 6050 with no problem. I want to know how high I can run the rpm on the dyno before the rev limiter kicks in.
 
  #4  
Old 08-26-2010, 10:51 PM
Kansas99XJ8's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Kansas
Posts: 91
Received 18 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

My XJ8 coughed a bit as the rev limiter kicked in when I left in 2nd to about 7200.
 
  #5  
Old 08-27-2010, 12:48 AM
QuadManiac's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 908
Received 89 Likes on 73 Posts
Default

If peak power is at 6150, one can assume that it's somewhat above that. This makes Kansas's 7200 sound reasonable. The shifts want to happen such that peak power is somewhere near halfway between just shifted and about to shift again. This maximizes average power.
 

Last edited by QuadManiac; 08-27-2010 at 12:51 AM.
  #6  
Old 08-27-2010, 01:19 AM
avos's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,616
Received 1,068 Likes on 761 Posts
Default

The engine revs until about 6200 but the torque converter doesn't lockup at wot. So when the dyno man calibrates the rpm by having the engine rev at a constant speed/constant power, they record the rpm in locked condition. At full power the RPM shown on the dyno will be lower than the actual engine speed.
 
  #7  
Old 08-27-2010, 08:23 PM
QuadManiac's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 908
Received 89 Likes on 73 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by avos
The engine revs until about 6200 but the torque converter doesn't lockup at wot. So when the dyno man calibrates the rpm by having the engine rev at a constant speed/constant power, they record the rpm in locked condition. At full power the RPM shown on the dyno will be lower than the actual engine speed.

Are you suggesting that the dyno calculates RPM from rear wheel speed?

Otherwise, if they're looking at spark via an inductive pickup, or plugged into the OBD and reading RPM digitally, engine RPM is RPM, regardless of what the tranny is doing.

Certainly if the TC is not locked, the tranny INPUT SHAFT rotation rate will be lower than engine RPM... but does that have anything to do with torque/power at the rear wheels relative to engine RPM measurement, other than a loss component?
 

Last edited by QuadManiac; 08-27-2010 at 08:30 PM.
  #8  
Old 08-28-2010, 12:45 AM
avos's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,616
Received 1,068 Likes on 761 Posts
Default

Seldom seen a dyno operator use the ODBII signals, and I guess getting a spark signal on our cars would be somewhat cumbersome, as for most cars (the older 4.0 ones) you would need to take of covers which takes time.

The dyno measures the power, that has nothing to do with the RPM indication, but when the dyno software then also wants to calculate engine power, then these numbers will be even more off if they use the wrong rpm.
 
  #9  
Old 08-28-2010, 09:20 AM
SteveM's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 685
Received 97 Likes on 69 Posts
Default

The dyno operator actually took off the spark plug covers and measured the spark signal.

That's after he looked under the hood and asked, "Where the hell are the spark plugs?"
 
  #10  
Old 08-29-2010, 03:29 AM
QuadManiac's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 908
Received 89 Likes on 73 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by avos
Seldom seen a dyno operator use the ODBII signals, and I guess getting a spark signal on our cars would be somewhat cumbersome, as for most cars (the older 4.0 ones) you would need to take of covers which takes time.

The dyno measures the power, that has nothing to do with the RPM indication, but when the dyno software then also wants to calculate engine power, then these numbers will be even more off if they use the wrong rpm.

Actually, the dynomometer measures only torque. The subsequent power is calculated from this torque times RPM times a conversion constant... so if engine RPM is not known accurately, power at the rear wheels can still be calculated, but not related to any engine RPM, only to effective vehicle speed instead (or transmission input shaft RPM using drivetrain ratios).
 

Last edited by QuadManiac; 08-29-2010 at 03:41 AM.
  #11  
Old 03-28-2013, 01:14 AM
GerryXJR's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Syracuse NY
Posts: 66
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

And the answer is ?
 
  #12  
Old 03-28-2013, 01:22 AM
XJR-99's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Europe
Posts: 875
Received 321 Likes on 218 Posts
Default

I have hit the limiter a few times when rev with 2nd gear. I think it's 6200-6300rpm. If using D, it changes at 6K.
 
The following users liked this post:
GerryXJR (03-28-2013)
  #13  
Old 03-28-2013, 01:49 AM
GerryXJR's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Syracuse NY
Posts: 66
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by XJR-99
I have hit the limiter a few times when rev with 2nd gear. I think it's 6200-6300rpm. If using D, it changes at 6K.

.
Thats kinda what i was hoping, i was a bit worried it might be dipping into the low 7's and i wouldnt be very comfortable with that...

I'm very confident in the strength of this engine, but on the other hand i kinda need to know there is a safe guard so it dosent implode...

and that the limiter is well within the safety level on the R's...

Thanks for the info
 
  #14  
Old 03-28-2013, 04:20 PM
Red October's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Merseyside, United Kingdom
Posts: 586
Received 239 Likes on 168 Posts
Default

From Jaguar's Technical Guides, the supercharged engine is rev-limited to 6200rpm and the normally-aspirated engines are rev-limited to 6950rpm.

The supercharged engines have a noticeably lower rev limit in order to prevent the supercharger from overspeeding beyond it's safe design limits with the stock pulley sizes-the Eaton unit also becomes noticeably more inefficient if the rotational speed rises too high.
 
The following 2 users liked this post by Red October:
GerryXJR (03-28-2013), plums (03-28-2013)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
carl purchase
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
6
10-14-2015 06:14 PM
JTC3400
XJ XJ6 / XJ8 / XJR ( X350 & X358 )
5
09-29-2015 05:03 PM
Mark SF
XJ XJ8 / XJR ( X308 )
4
09-28-2015 01:51 PM
yarpos
Australia - Victoria / Tasmania
0
09-27-2015 06:14 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: Rev Limiter?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:31 AM.