XJ XJ8 / XJR ( X308 ) 1997 - 2003

Shock absorbers!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 10-09-2017, 10:47 PM
ericjansen's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Taiwan, R.O.C.
Posts: 3,247
Received 1,354 Likes on 928 Posts
Default

They are not the same, one is for a car with CATS, the other is for a car without.
You will need to check what you have now.
 
  #22  
Old 10-09-2017, 11:21 PM
TexasXJR's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: DTX
Posts: 44
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

CATS?
 
  #23  
Old 10-09-2017, 11:53 PM
TexasXJR's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: DTX
Posts: 44
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Which is the best option for me? There is no electrical connection on the shock mounts. Also I have found a touring class and heavy duty. which are stock on the XJR
 
  #24  
Old 10-10-2017, 05:15 AM
Col. Sandurz's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 287
Received 54 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

These:
24-023726
 
  #25  
Old 10-11-2017, 09:28 AM
Count Iblis's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: 'Out West', USA
Posts: 662
Received 296 Likes on 164 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Daim
I would like a little more stiffness whilst driving. The comfort is nice, but at higher Autobahn speeds, the softness is a little "tricky". And as the XJ is an ideal drift car (not kidding), a little firmer would be great What would you recommend?


I want my cars ride/handling to be like an E39 M5. Its not as far fetched as one might think. I work with a ride and handling vehicle dynamics expert and he says the weight distribution is good on our cars and the suspension geometry- so its primarily a case of matching the wheel rates.
I like the damper rates of the older Straight six 'R' variants- a little stiffer than our X308 Rs. Unfortunately the older X306 dampers have a different fixture at the front than the X308s. Springs can be tailor made.
 
  #26  
Old 10-12-2017, 09:58 PM
coastaljag98's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Apalachicola Florida
Posts: 546
Received 45 Likes on 37 Posts
Default

Don’t waste your time with KYB. Just did this and they lasted about 5k miles. I just had to replace and went Bilstein on rear with new spring isolators. Can’t wait to change front ones too!
 
  #27  
Old 10-12-2017, 10:08 PM
ericjansen's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Taiwan, R.O.C.
Posts: 3,247
Received 1,354 Likes on 928 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by coastaljag98
Don’t waste your time with KYB. Just did this and they lasted about 5k miles. I just had to replace and went Bilstein on rear with new spring isolators. Can’t wait to change front ones too!
This is, unfortunately, not the first time I read about KYB and its very short life on our Jaguars .
I's the reason I went Bilstein too.
 
  #28  
Old 10-12-2017, 10:28 PM
King Charles's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: North Carolina,USA
Posts: 4,511
Received 1,023 Likes on 741 Posts
Default

Went w/ Sensen shocks here, zero complaints.
 
  #29  
Old 10-12-2017, 11:19 PM
ericjansen's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Taiwan, R.O.C.
Posts: 3,247
Received 1,354 Likes on 928 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by King Charles
Went w/ Sensen shocks here, zero complaints.
That's cause your car is in the transmission shop for a decade by now ...
 
  #30  
Old 10-12-2017, 11:51 PM
King Charles's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: North Carolina,USA
Posts: 4,511
Received 1,023 Likes on 741 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ericjansen
That's cause your car is in the transmission shop for a decade by now ...
Albeit it rode much better in the miles prior to that lol.
 
  #31  
Old 10-13-2017, 10:00 PM
Mark SF's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: SF bay area
Posts: 1,395
Received 420 Likes on 320 Posts
Default

Generally, it is very important to match the shocks to the spring rate, for the best ride and handling. The best matched shocks should be the oem ones, in this case Bilstein. They also happen to be the best quality around, pretty much. Very, very durable, in my experience.
 
  #32  
Old 10-13-2017, 10:06 PM
Mark SF's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: SF bay area
Posts: 1,395
Received 420 Likes on 320 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Count Iblis
I want my cars ride/handling to be like an E39 M5. Its not as far fetched as one might think. I work with a ride and handling vehicle dynamics expert and he says the weight distribution is good on our cars and the suspension geometry- so its primarily a case of matching the wheel rates.
I like the damper rates of the older Straight six 'R' variants- a little stiffer than our X308 Rs. Unfortunately the older X306 dampers have a different fixture at the front than the X308s. Springs can be tailor made.
It's not going to handle like an E39, and you'll ruin it trying. That's OK, because the E39 ride is shockingly poor compared to the Jag. Your best bet is to restore the Jag to its original ride and handling - by replacing worn components. That begins with a careful examination of all the suspension components.

Does your ride and handling dynamics expert appreciate that the BMW is a 20 year newer design with tubular welded aluminum sub frames and sophisticated multi link front and rear suspension?
 
  #33  
Old 10-14-2017, 02:42 PM
Count Iblis's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: 'Out West', USA
Posts: 662
Received 296 Likes on 164 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mark SF
It's not going to handle like an E39, and you'll ruin it trying. That's OK, because the E39 ride is shockingly poor compared to the Jag. Your best bet is to restore the Jag to its original ride and handling - by replacing worn components. That begins with a careful examination of all the suspension components.

Does your ride and handling dynamics expert appreciate that the BMW is a 20 year newer design with tubular welded aluminum sub frames and sophisticated multi link front and rear suspension?

My friend disagrees with you. What's your background? I'm assuming you've worked for an OEM and have been involved in vehicle dynamics and ride and handling of several vehicles?


My friend has been involved in several OEM platforms and used to work for Pro-Drive.


He's a BMW nut like me and currently drives an XF. The control a multi link gives over a double wishbone set up is certainly better but its 'fine tuning' at best- the main points are that the weight distribution is similar (52:48) and some of the key chassis dimensions aren't a mile away.
 
  #34  
Old 10-15-2017, 01:46 PM
omgimali's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Cheraw SC
Posts: 1,487
Received 107 Likes on 89 Posts
Default

Bilsteins is the way to go. If you go to jaguar they will sell you the Bilsteins but for almost triple the price. Go to amazon and the Bilsteins are $100. If you own the Supercharged R varient of the XJ then go with the green sport shocks because they go with the sport spring. If you have the XJ8, VDP or L get the Black comfort standard shocks. If you put Sport shocks on the standard suspension the ride is going to be rough because of the Comfort springs.
 
  #35  
Old 10-18-2017, 08:02 AM
Mark SF's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: SF bay area
Posts: 1,395
Received 420 Likes on 320 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Count Iblis
My friend disagrees with you. What's your background? I'm assuming you've worked for an OEM and have been involved in vehicle dynamics and ride and handling of several vehicles?


My friend has been involved in several OEM platforms and used to work for Pro-Drive.


He's a BMW nut like me and currently drives an XF. The control a multi link gives over a double wishbone set up is certainly better but its 'fine tuning' at best- the main points are that the weight distribution is similar (52:48) and some of the key chassis dimensions aren't a mile away.
No, weight distribution is only one factor. The first, and most important one, the foundation if you will, is structural stiffness. Without it you won't get a great handling car. It's something that is now 3 generations improved on an XF. The X308 structure was designed in the EARLY 80s. At the time, they did a good job. Now, it's ancient. I'm surprised your friend doesn't appreciate this as this is pretty basic stuff.
 
  #36  
Old 10-18-2017, 08:11 AM
Count Iblis's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: 'Out West', USA
Posts: 662
Received 296 Likes on 164 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mark SF
No, weight distribution is only one factor. The first, and most important one, the foundation if you will, is structural stiffness. Without it you won't get a great handling car. It's something that is now 3 generations improved on an XF. The X308 structure was designed in the EARLY 80s. At the time, they did a good job. Now, it's ancient. I'm surprised your friend doesn't appreciate this as this is pretty basic stuff.
I cited the above but he said that you could still make vast improvements and those factors were smaller.
It's true the X308s torsional rigidity isn't that great by modern standards: 13,000 Nm/deg vs the current norm of 20,000 plus.
BMW quote 24,000 Nm/deg for the E39 but Jaguar found it was nearer 15,000. The BMW DOES benefit from laser welding.
 
  #37  
Old 10-18-2017, 09:37 AM
Mark SF's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: SF bay area
Posts: 1,395
Received 420 Likes on 320 Posts
Default

Well, they're both about 10 tines better than my new XJSC cabriolet.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Johnken
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
11
04-08-2018 10:21 AM
Chuck Schexnayder
XJ XJ6 / XJ8 / XJR ( X350 & X358 )
33
10-24-2015 10:20 PM
hoodun
XJS ( X27 )
26
10-06-2015 08:34 PM
dmatthewman
XJ XJ6 / XJ8 / XJR ( X350 & X358 )
1
09-30-2015 10:10 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: Shock absorbers!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:19 PM.