XJ XJ8 / XJR ( X308 ) 1997 - 2003

XJR Nikasil better than steel?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 07-10-2020, 07:25 AM
XJ Ned's Avatar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 7
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default XJR Nikasil better than steel?

Hi, another question from my novice self as I continue on my search for an X308 XJR...

It’s been suggested to me by a very well respected and experienced Jag restorer in the UK that it is preferable to try and get an XJR with the earlier Nikasil linings as this earlier iteration of the AJ26 / AJ27 performs ‘better’.

Just wandering if anyone agrees or disagrees with this suggestion? Is the difference in performance really that noticeable compares to the steel lined later engine?

I’m just really nervous that with my relative inexperience of these cars that I might buy a car which on the surface seems to drive nicely but which actually may end up very quickly needing a replacement engine!

Any thoughts very much appreciated!
 
  #2  
Old 07-10-2020, 09:12 AM
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Wise County,TX
Posts: 12,187
Received 8,151 Likes on 4,917 Posts
Default

The Nikasil engines have low tension piston rings and do seem to rotate with less force when turned by hand.

The Nikasil liner is claimed to be harder than steel so should last longer?

Overheating and high sulfur fuel are the main reasons for failure.(or poor maintenance)

I have 2 Nikasil engine XJ8 and one with a 2002 iron liner engine.
They all run fine and don't use much oil. (5W30 or 5W40)
 
The following users liked this post:
XJ Ned (07-10-2020)
  #3  
Old 07-10-2020, 09:37 AM
Addicted2boost's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 2,725
Received 1,101 Likes on 845 Posts
Default

I’m fairly partial to the nikasil lined engines myself. 262K miles on the original engine in my 98’ XJR. Thats not to say the steel lined engines aren’t bad either. I worked on a customers 03’ VP with 331K miles on it at least 2.5 years ago. It really is up to how the car was maintained and if there was no indication of an overheating situation, then it should be fine. I strongly recommend getting it checked out by a Jaguar specialist prior to handing over payment.
 
The following 2 users liked this post by Addicted2boost:
motorcarman (07-10-2020), XJ Ned (07-10-2020)
  #4  
Old 07-11-2020, 08:23 AM
xalty's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 3,305
Received 1,061 Likes on 852 Posts
Default

Only thing that matters is the condition of the timing gear
 
  #5  
Old 07-11-2020, 09:37 AM
M. Stojanovic's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 1,699
Received 887 Likes on 622 Posts
Default

The risk if going for a Nikasil engine is the possibility that the Nikasil was "eaten" by the use of high sulphur petrol. However, this is fairly easily detected by a compression test and I would definitely do one if considering buying a Nikasil Jag.

In any case, I would look for an XJR no older than 1999 as the chances of its Nikasil affected by the sulphur would be smaller. In the UK, the low sulphur petrol was introduced from 1 January 2000 Nikasil engines that survived up to this date are fine (subject to good maintenance, of course). Perhaps a low mileage 1998 would also be fine.

The last Nikasil engine was produced on 17 August 2000. The first steel lined engine had engine number 00 08 18 1043 meaning Year 2000, Month 08, Day 18, 10:43 am. Any engine number prior to this will have Nikasil.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mburge03
XJS ( X27 )
1
07-14-2018 10:45 AM
electrovolt
XJ XJ8 / XJR ( X308 )
1
08-01-2014 05:22 PM
GerryXJR
XJ XJ8 / XJR ( X308 )
29
02-18-2013 08:42 AM
Ipc838
XJ XJ8 / XJR ( X308 )
5
10-04-2012 04:06 AM
XJ XJ8 / XJR ( X308 )
1
02-25-2007 05:26 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: XJR Nikasil better than steel?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:29 AM.