XJ XJ8 / XJR ( X308 ) 1997 - 2003

ZF5HP vs 722.6 5G-Tronic

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 02-16-2012, 12:11 AM
blackwolf560's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: el paso
Posts: 149
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default ZF5HP vs 722.6 5G-Tronic

I been wondering for a while. I've heard of numerous posts about the failure of the ZF5hp transmission found in the XJ8. Yet, for the XJR, havent heard too much trouble with that box.

Now I wonder this. If the 4.0 regular and 4.0 SC is basically the same engine, I assume, the connection point for the Transmission bellhousing is the same. (correct me if I'm wrong.). So if something was to happen to the ZF, which many say is crap for the amount of power the regular XJ8 puts out, making it basically unsuitbale for the near 400 the SC puts out, what is stopping an owner from dropping the 722.6 5G-Tronic tranny in a naturally aspired 4.0 and calling it a day? I guess one of the biggest hurdle would be software.

Note: Owned many cars with ZF trannies and each always had a legion that said they were crappy gearboxes. Ironicaly, never had any problem with ZFs. And very familiar with the MBZ boxes. Complicated buggers but sturdy as hell, usually.
 
  #2  
Old 02-16-2012, 04:52 AM
Sean B's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sunny Southport UK
Posts: 4,771
Received 1,356 Likes on 1,067 Posts
Default

main problem is the fact the gearbox 'talks' to the engine control module and body control module and speedo cluster. You would need all for even the remotest chance of it all to work.
 
  #3  
Old 02-16-2012, 06:01 AM
JKo's Avatar
JKo
JKo is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Finland
Posts: 322
Received 27 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Body control module..? Does that mean that the gearbox is connected to CATS? Or does it just use the same sensors?
 
  #4  
Old 02-16-2012, 06:35 AM
Sean B's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sunny Southport UK
Posts: 4,771
Received 1,356 Likes on 1,067 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JKo
Body control module..? Does that mean that the gearbox is connected to CATS? Or does it just use the same sensors?
If you think about it, the BCM is on the CAN network between engine/gearbox, how else would the car know which gear it was in, and to light up the selector. Furthermore, the instrument pack also requires a signal from BCM, it's not connected directly to the gearbox module, or engine module. The BCM on each car does a lot more than you think.

Once you've grasped how CAN networks and the interlinking modules work for both cars, then you can understand how difficult it is. This is without considering the pin outs on each module being different including the harnesses/looms, it's not just a case of slinging in a different gearbox.

I've looked into this in some depth. If anyone has a working conversion, I'M ALL EARS!
 
  #5  
Old 02-16-2012, 09:09 AM
JKo's Avatar
JKo
JKo is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Finland
Posts: 322
Received 27 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Oh, ok. Misunderstood what a body control module is
 
  #6  
Old 02-16-2012, 03:27 PM
Boomer from Boston's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: West Central Mass. USA
Posts: 709
Received 87 Likes on 71 Posts
Default

You might need something like a "translator module" to go in between the BCM and the transmission. People still put different engines and transmissions in custom cars, so it must be possible to do. But no doubt expensive.
 
  #7  
Old 02-16-2012, 04:18 PM
blackwolf560's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: el paso
Posts: 149
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sean B
If you think about it, the BCM is on the CAN network between engine/gearbox, how else would the car know which gear it was in, and to light up the selector. Furthermore, the instrument pack also requires a signal from BCM, it's not connected directly to the gearbox module, or engine module. The BCM on each car does a lot more than you think.

Once you've grasped how CAN networks and the interlinking modules work for both cars, then you can understand how difficult it is. This is without considering the pin outs on each module being different including the harnesses/looms, it's not just a case of slinging in a different gearbox.

I've looked into this in some depth. If anyone has a working conversion, I'M ALL EARS!

makes sense.
 
  #8  
Old 02-16-2012, 05:07 PM
avt007's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Langley BC
Posts: 2,206
Received 536 Likes on 415 Posts
Default

A very interesting idea. But if you're handy with wrenches, you can repair your ZF for a lot less work and money than putting in a different trans.
 
  #9  
Old 02-16-2012, 05:59 PM
ixj8it's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 556
Received 46 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Boomer from Boston
You might need something like a "translator module" to go in between the BCM and the transmission. People still put different engines and transmissions in custom cars, so it must be possible to do. But no doubt expensive.
On tccoa, there was a discussion about swapping the newer Ford 6r80 into a Thunderbird. It will fit, but all data is transferred over the CAN network of the newer vehicles. Surely, someone out there understands the systems, CAN operation and integrated circuits. Like I said in the thread over there, "I wish someone would just make a module that can handle the data and have speedometer outputs/etc to make this happen. On the jag it would just need to be a "translator" as you say, with much less wires. All we need is the know-how. FWIW though, my ZF hasnt gave me a problem since I upgraded the clutch drum.
 
  #10  
Old 02-16-2012, 07:51 PM
blackwolf560's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: el paso
Posts: 149
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by avt007
A very interesting idea. But if you're handy with wrenches, you can repair your ZF for a lot less work and money than putting in a different trans.

Oh no, my tranny is just fine and if something was to happen I probably would just rebuild it myself like I did another ZF not too long ago.

Unfortunately, not everyone seemed as lucky to have problem free ZF tranny as I have. I just was wondering if these trannys go out like that why no one bothered to put in the 722 tranny, which there is less reported problem on the xjr (and MBZ e55). Now I understand from the responses why not many people bothered to do it. At the same time as another response, it probably is possible but might be exspensive, but swaps always are. People put v-12s and 99 s-class motors into W126s every so often even though the software is no where near compatible and cost a pretty penny (or thousands of pretty pennies).

I'm not sure if my tranny has the upgraded drum but as long as it's working I'm good. only turned over 50K so far but I'm not too keen on the "lifetime" fluid mania. What monkey came up with that idea? Use basically same fluid, take away dipstick and that magically makes it lifetime when a few years ago it was in bold red letters to change the fluid every so often. Guess they figured buyers of this caliber cars in 1998 and up would only keep the car till warrenty expires and buy new one. Guess they didnt realize that some of us like the car more than a piece of dispoable toilet paper that is used to impress people for a few years.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GGabriel
XJ XJ8 / XJR ( X308 )
3
09-18-2015 08:44 PM
80sRule
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
3
07-27-2015 07:29 AM
2000blackxkr
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
15
03-05-2013 10:28 AM
pomosv
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
2
02-26-2012 01:10 AM
pomosv
XK / XKR ( X150 )
2
02-25-2012 07:57 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: ZF5HP vs 722.6 5G-Tronic



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:44 AM.