I got the bug ... in need of medication
#41
Tomasso,
Apols on previous post, I typed 6.0 instead of 5.3.
I'll drop you an email tonight re. your PM to me, including an option on another 6.0 vehicle.
As Greg has said, a number of those companies will not undertake technical inspections AFAIK. I have a few suggestions of other people who may do this and I'll email to you. Of the ones you have there, Andy Harvey of Just XJS is extremely knowledgeable of XJSs. I have met Andy on a magazine photoshoot with our cars, and he was one of the previous custodians of my pre-HE Coupe. A real XJS enthusiast.
Cheers
Paul
Apols on previous post, I typed 6.0 instead of 5.3.
I'll drop you an email tonight re. your PM to me, including an option on another 6.0 vehicle.
As Greg has said, a number of those companies will not undertake technical inspections AFAIK. I have a few suggestions of other people who may do this and I'll email to you. Of the ones you have there, Andy Harvey of Just XJS is extremely knowledgeable of XJSs. I have met Andy on a magazine photoshoot with our cars, and he was one of the previous custodians of my pre-HE Coupe. A real XJS enthusiast.
Cheers
Paul
The following users liked this post:
Greg in France (02-02-2024)
#42
I just spoke with the owner of the blue, 1994, 140,000 miles, 6.0 litre 1994 XJS. He is retired, and drives it into London, once a week, some 50 miles. He has done a lot of repairs, and has shown me invoices in excess of £8,000 in the last 6 years that he has owned it, including:
- removing the sub-frame (rust)
- powder coating it and sealing it
- new shocks x 6
- brake pads (all around)
- tyres x 4
- etc, etc
Date tested: 11 December 2007
Test result: FAIL
Mileage: 130,665 miles
Reason(s) for failure:
- Body or chassis has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mountings (6.1.B.2)
- Body or chassis has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mountings (6.1.B.2)
- Body or chassis has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mountings (6.1.B.2)
- Body or chassis has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mountings (6.1.B.2)
- boot area not checked properly due to trim
- brake pipes corroding(not checked properly due to protective coating & above covers)
- rear trailing arm bushes cracking
- front tyres wearing on edges
- slight play steering rack,track rod ends
- slight play n/s/f wheel bearing
- rear tyres close to limit
- brake pads not checked
Tommaso
#43
Thank you Paul
I just spoke with Andrew and he is, truly, very knowledgeable. I read both MOTs to him and sent him the links. He too recommends to stay as far as possible from the 35,000 miles car because it's been sitting for so long, never mind the mileage incongruence. He cannot inspect it, but recommended a chap called Ray at Sussex Jag Centre (closer to where the XJS is).
Andrew also offered two of his 4.0 litres (one green one red). But I prefer the V12, for emotional and irrational reasons.
Finally he warned me to check the scuttle, and sent me some horrifying images of yet another V12 where an an ever so slight imperfection of the paint returned a nightmare:
Scary stuff!
Ciao, Tommaso
Andrew also offered two of his 4.0 litres (one green one red). But I prefer the V12, for emotional and irrational reasons.
Finally he warned me to check the scuttle, and sent me some horrifying images of yet another V12 where an an ever so slight imperfection of the paint returned a nightmare:
Scary stuff!
Ciao, Tommaso
Last edited by ascanio1; 02-02-2024 at 11:55 AM.
#44
#45
May I introduce a little OT? Will the admins forgive me this blasphemy? Look what an Italian friend - offended that I will not buy Italian - sent me to steer me away from the XJS:
In the past I owned the Gamma 2.5 i.e. and the 130 ... beautiful cars! I wonder if you know the story of how the design of the Camargue came to be ... first to answer wins a print !!
The following users liked this post:
Mkii250 (02-03-2024)
#46
I'm not quite sure why they did it, but I do know that the Camargue came about when Rolls contracted out its design to Pininfarina, and the design was done by Paolo Martin (who did some of those other designs pictured).
Incredibly controversial as a design and the most expensive car in the world, I drove a few of them when I was 18 and worked for British Car Auctions. I loved them then, and still do!
Paul
Incredibly controversial as a design and the most expensive car in the world, I drove a few of them when I was 18 and worked for British Car Auctions. I loved them then, and still do!
Paul
#48
I'm not quite sure why they did it, but I do know that the Camargue came about when Rolls contracted out its design to Pininfarina, and the design was done by Paolo Martin (who did some of those other designs pictured). Incredibly controversial as a design and the most expensive car in the world, I drove a few of them when I was 18 and worked for British Car Auctions. I loved them then, and still do! Paul
Our tale begins with the departure of Sir Denning Pearson, Chief Executive, and Sir David Huddie, Managing Director of Rolls-Royce Motors Limited in February 1971, amid significant shifts in ownership. Despite having been engaged in discussions with Pinin Farina for some time (see the background to our story), the marque had refrained from formalizing any agreements due to tumultuous financial circumstances. Also the new CEO remained prudent and of this conviction, much to the chagrin of Lord Cole (former Rolls-Royce Board member) who loved the Pinin Farina design.
In November 1971, Lord Cole found himself summoned to an urgent meeting at Crew. However, he had recently welcomed a visit from his Italian friend, an Earl touring Europe in his pristine Fiat 130 coupé. Unwilling to abandon his guest in London, Lord Cole extended him an invitation to visit the prestigious Rolls-Royce factory. Thus, accompanied by the Italian Earl, they embarked on the journey to Crewe.
The CEO, captivated by this new design of Sergio Pininfarina and Paolo Martin, and conceding to the Italian Earl's persuasive rhetoric, abandoned all caution and agreed to allow the Earl to send a telex to Turin, to Sergio, with whom the Earl maintained a close acquaintance. In the ensuing days, Pinin Farina arrived in London, marking the commencement of a remarkable collaboration. And as they say, the rest is history.
This articles captivates the background to our story, if you are interested: https://www.flyingspares.com/news/ho...wing-1966.html
Last edited by ascanio1; 02-02-2024 at 03:21 PM.
#49
compared to its predecessor, it absolutely does! However compared to the platform it was built on It’s a good effort. Influenced by the earlier Mustang.
As a touring car its styling is OK. But so many of us still wanted a sports car and there is absolutely no way it’s a sports car. Much of the sales reluctance was due to waiting for the F type.
As a touring car its styling is OK. But so many of us still wanted a sports car and there is absolutely no way it’s a sports car. Much of the sales reluctance was due to waiting for the F type.
#50
I would argue it didn't really have a predecessor. I believe it was meant to be a new class of car for Jaguar, a true grand tourer to gobble up miles on the continent and US highways, rather than a replacement for the E-type. At its conception, I imagine the assumption was that there would be a sports car, a GT, and a Saloon in the line up. Financial constraints proved otherwise.
One could claim that the Series 3 V12 2+2 E-type was close to being a predecessor, but (apologies to any owners of one) it was an example of taking one of the most beautiful designs in automotive history and giving it the inverse Ugly Duckling treatment.
One could claim that the Series 3 V12 2+2 E-type was close to being a predecessor, but (apologies to any owners of one) it was an example of taking one of the most beautiful designs in automotive history and giving it the inverse Ugly Duckling treatment.
The following users liked this post:
Greg in France (02-04-2024)
#51
#52
Not that I am biased, mind...
The following users liked this post:
Mac Allan (02-04-2024)
#53
After a few weeks of research and inspecting a few XJSs, this is where I stand: I realized that the budget assigned, that I was prepared to park on the driveway, won't be enough to buy a facelift, V12, XJS, considering:
(i) my inclination towards fastidious, OCD, maintenance (*) which will end up costing me more, if I do not buy a perfect XJS to start with.
(ii) it will have to e parked in the driveway - which limits the investment to something worth accepting that it will depreciate, certainly not £17,000 (necessary if I want a perfect, facelift, V12 XJS). I miscalculated the used car market for this model.
(iii) I already own too many cars and buying another one that will end up parked in a farm 5 miles from home means that it won't be a daily driver: it will become another doll in the dollhouse and my wife commented that, since I'm not gender fluid, I should not buy anymore dolls, I have enough as it is!
I am now considering either postponing the medical intervention, to when I will move to a home with a larger garage, or buying a different model, which investment can depreciate on the driveway. I am open to comments and advice.
Thanks for all the help! It is really appreciated! Tommaso
(*) my 8 y.o. daughter says that her papá is PetrOLCD ... !!
(i) my inclination towards fastidious, OCD, maintenance (*) which will end up costing me more, if I do not buy a perfect XJS to start with.
(ii) it will have to e parked in the driveway - which limits the investment to something worth accepting that it will depreciate, certainly not £17,000 (necessary if I want a perfect, facelift, V12 XJS). I miscalculated the used car market for this model.
(iii) I already own too many cars and buying another one that will end up parked in a farm 5 miles from home means that it won't be a daily driver: it will become another doll in the dollhouse and my wife commented that, since I'm not gender fluid, I should not buy anymore dolls, I have enough as it is!
I am now considering either postponing the medical intervention, to when I will move to a home with a larger garage, or buying a different model, which investment can depreciate on the driveway. I am open to comments and advice.
Thanks for all the help! It is really appreciated! Tommaso
(*) my 8 y.o. daughter says that her papá is PetrOLCD ... !!
Last edited by ascanio1; 02-05-2024 at 04:07 AM.
#54
#55
Tommaso,
I'd like to suggest a slightly differing viewpoint to your thoughts.
- I don't believe that any XJS will now depreciate if maintained well. In the UK, at least, I think the bottom of the depreciation curve happened some years ago, and well-kept examples will only further appreciate now.
- It's naturally preferrable to keep a car garaged when not in use, but it's perfectly feasible to keep a car in good condition outdoors. I've had my 4.0 convertible for over 20 years, but it's only been garaged for about the last 4 years. Before that it lived outside, sometimes with a cover on but sometimes with 6 inches of snow on it. See photos below. The key things is to keep it clean, keep it waxed, and, most importantly, keep using it! My car isn't perfect, but I'd politely suggest that it's really quite good. It's been featured in a number of Classic Car magazines over the years, and was one of the 75 cars used by Jaguar to celebrate their 75th anniversary. Yes, I'm reasonably handy with spanners, but it's perfectly feasible for an XJS to live outdoors and stay in great condition. A colleague of mine has a 4.0 convertible and the last RHD 6.0 convertible and they have both lived outside on his driveway for over 20 years.
- Will a very nice condition £17,000 Coupe now depreciate if it lives outside? IMO, absolutely not, if you look after it properly. Get the underside dry-iced and get the body and underside properly waxed on Day 1 and you'll have a car ready for use Summer or Winter.
You know my views on all the cars you've seen. The more expensive ones will be cheaper in the long run, especially with your quality standards. If you want a 6.0 big-bumper one, get the Flamenco Red one inspected. If you want a pre big-bumper car, get the silver ex-Japan inspected. If you just want the best condition car, buy the ex-Japan one.
Cheers
Paul
I'd like to suggest a slightly differing viewpoint to your thoughts.
- I don't believe that any XJS will now depreciate if maintained well. In the UK, at least, I think the bottom of the depreciation curve happened some years ago, and well-kept examples will only further appreciate now.
- It's naturally preferrable to keep a car garaged when not in use, but it's perfectly feasible to keep a car in good condition outdoors. I've had my 4.0 convertible for over 20 years, but it's only been garaged for about the last 4 years. Before that it lived outside, sometimes with a cover on but sometimes with 6 inches of snow on it. See photos below. The key things is to keep it clean, keep it waxed, and, most importantly, keep using it! My car isn't perfect, but I'd politely suggest that it's really quite good. It's been featured in a number of Classic Car magazines over the years, and was one of the 75 cars used by Jaguar to celebrate their 75th anniversary. Yes, I'm reasonably handy with spanners, but it's perfectly feasible for an XJS to live outdoors and stay in great condition. A colleague of mine has a 4.0 convertible and the last RHD 6.0 convertible and they have both lived outside on his driveway for over 20 years.
- Will a very nice condition £17,000 Coupe now depreciate if it lives outside? IMO, absolutely not, if you look after it properly. Get the underside dry-iced and get the body and underside properly waxed on Day 1 and you'll have a car ready for use Summer or Winter.
You know my views on all the cars you've seen. The more expensive ones will be cheaper in the long run, especially with your quality standards. If you want a 6.0 big-bumper one, get the Flamenco Red one inspected. If you want a pre big-bumper car, get the silver ex-Japan inspected. If you just want the best condition car, buy the ex-Japan one.
Cheers
Paul
The following 2 users liked this post by ptjs1:
Greg in France (02-05-2024),
LnrB (02-05-2024)
#56
The following users liked this post:
Greg in France (02-05-2024)
#57
Thank you, Alex & Paul,
I've never parked cars outside, but you're English and have more experience with this climate. I'll take your word for it and I'll re-consider.
Paul, which of the two Japanese, you believe to be "the best condition car" even superior to the red/Bordeaux one? The grey one, self maintained? Or the Le Mans?
Alex, I had a DBS before, been there, done that. I love the XJS Coupé shape. It's far superior.
I've never parked cars outside, but you're English and have more experience with this climate. I'll take your word for it and I'll re-consider.
Paul, which of the two Japanese, you believe to be "the best condition car" even superior to the red/Bordeaux one? The grey one, self maintained? Or the Le Mans?
Alex, I had a DBS before, been there, done that. I love the XJS Coupé shape. It's far superior.
Last edited by ascanio1; 02-05-2024 at 09:17 AM.
The following users liked this post:
Greg in France (02-05-2024)
#58
I'll bring a bottle of our reserve Taurasi from our family vines! We've been producing wine for 9 generations now. 10 if you count my daughter who's 8 and already presses wine ...
That was me on the left, 25 years ago, when I pretended to be fit & active!
Last edited by ascanio1; 02-05-2024 at 09:19 AM.
#59
Thank you, Alex & Paul,
I've never parked cars outside, but you're English and have more experience with this climate. I'll take your word for it and I'll re-consider.
Paul, which of the two Japanese, you believe to be "the best condition car" even superior to the red/Bordeaux one? The grey one, self maintained? Or the Le Mans?
Alex, I had a DBS before, been there, done that. I love the XJS Coupé shape. It's far superior.
I've never parked cars outside, but you're English and have more experience with this climate. I'll take your word for it and I'll re-consider.
Paul, which of the two Japanese, you believe to be "the best condition car" even superior to the red/Bordeaux one? The grey one, self maintained? Or the Le Mans?
Alex, I had a DBS before, been there, done that. I love the XJS Coupé shape. It's far superior.
Tommaso,
Not the Le Mans, I mean the early facelift 1991 silver one. Look at the engine bay, it's usually the "window to the car". If the underside is commenurate with that (as ex-Japan cars often are) then it will be the best of the bunch by far.
Paul
PS The red big-bumper is either Mica Regency Red, or Mica Flamenco Red (more likely). They stopped offering Bordeaux Red XJS in 1991.
#60
I do. I live in in South Berkshire, if you invite me, I'll be there in a pop! I'll PM you, as I'm currently in Italy looking after a few interests (including a Double Six) and I should be back mid February.
I'll bring a bottle of our reserve Taurasi from our family vines! We've been producing wine for 9 generations now. 10 if you count my daughter who's 8 and already presses wine ...
That was me on the left, 25 years ago, when I pretended to be fit & active!
I'll bring a bottle of our reserve Taurasi from our family vines! We've been producing wine for 9 generations now. 10 if you count my daughter who's 8 and already presses wine ...
That was me on the left, 25 years ago, when I pretended to be fit & active!
Paul
The following users liked this post:
Greg in France (02-05-2024)