running too rich.
#103
#104
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
definitely not the worst jag ever. mines totally and completely rust free, gorgeous, and with the exception of a bad subframe bush and a leaking power steering hose, utterly wonderful to drive.
i have said "Worst.... Engine.... Ever" a few times.
#105
#106
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
the V12 definitely sounds better, especially once i took the air cleaners chokes off, and ill be really dissapointed if i end up lumping it.
#107
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
heres another fun fact. after letting the jag run for half an hour or so, playing with vacuum hoses etc. and making baby step progress, i finally got the car to a point where i could plug the ECU vacuum hose back into the crossover and it would idle! it even ran and everything. at this point the engine was pretty warm.
drove the car up and down the driveway and it drove ok. parked the car, shut it off, fired it back up and it still ran decent. shut it off, went to start it back up and realized the positive battery cable had come undone. reconnected the cable, fired it back up, and it wouldn't run with the ECU vacuum hose plugged in. i disconnected it and manually put a vacuum on the ECU an it ran fine after that. couldnt get the ECU to run off the idle vacuum anymore.
it seemed like the ECU had finally adapted to run at idle vacuum, and when the battery came undone it went back to square one.
drove the car up and down the driveway and it drove ok. parked the car, shut it off, fired it back up and it still ran decent. shut it off, went to start it back up and realized the positive battery cable had come undone. reconnected the cable, fired it back up, and it wouldn't run with the ECU vacuum hose plugged in. i disconnected it and manually put a vacuum on the ECU an it ran fine after that. couldnt get the ECU to run off the idle vacuum anymore.
it seemed like the ECU had finally adapted to run at idle vacuum, and when the battery came undone it went back to square one.
#108
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I got started in this thread because I just went through rewiring my CTS and the YB to the TPS last week. My car ran great, except for the first few minutes of a cold start. It would chug along at just a few rpms and almost die. I wanted to be able to just jump in it cold and drive away. It ran perfectly after about 3-5 minutes warmup, though. After rebuilding my AAV and going through everything relating to the vac advance and 45-sec timer I checked the CTS resistance back at the ECU and it was reading high when cold (about 1200 ohms at the CTS but 1600 at the ECU at the particular temperature it was at). So, I rewired.
When the wiring was done I started the car up and was really angry with myself. It was running OK but pouring smoke and unburnt fuel out of the pipes. I cursed, shut the hood and went in to work figuring I just wasted a few hours. After the car had warmed up the smoke seemed to go away.
The next day I went outside and started it up. It was about 30 degrees outside. It fired right up and ran beautifully with no smoke. With no warmup whatsoever I hopped in and drove away. Same thing the day after.
Do these ECUs really react this severely to "changes" to their normal daily routine? It almost seemed like it was pissed at me for repairing the CTS wiring, and then after it thought about it for a bit it realized, "oh, yeah, this IS better".
Sorry for the diatribe but is there some sort of a flash or memory clear procedure that needs to be gone through after making changes or something? Your comment about it running better with the + batt cable pulled made me think of what happened to me last week. I still think you have to redo your wiring harness and your vac lines and stuff, but I'm wondering after each of these issues you've repaired if you shouldn't be clearing the ECU memory in some way before you pass judgment that whatever you did, DIDN'T work.
D
Anyone have any input?
When the wiring was done I started the car up and was really angry with myself. It was running OK but pouring smoke and unburnt fuel out of the pipes. I cursed, shut the hood and went in to work figuring I just wasted a few hours. After the car had warmed up the smoke seemed to go away.
The next day I went outside and started it up. It was about 30 degrees outside. It fired right up and ran beautifully with no smoke. With no warmup whatsoever I hopped in and drove away. Same thing the day after.
Do these ECUs really react this severely to "changes" to their normal daily routine? It almost seemed like it was pissed at me for repairing the CTS wiring, and then after it thought about it for a bit it realized, "oh, yeah, this IS better".
Sorry for the diatribe but is there some sort of a flash or memory clear procedure that needs to be gone through after making changes or something? Your comment about it running better with the + batt cable pulled made me think of what happened to me last week. I still think you have to redo your wiring harness and your vac lines and stuff, but I'm wondering after each of these issues you've repaired if you shouldn't be clearing the ECU memory in some way before you pass judgment that whatever you did, DIDN'T work.
D
Anyone have any input?
#109
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest USA
Posts: 24,823
Received 10,871 Likes
on
7,150 Posts
#110
#111
#112
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The O2 sensor light doesn't indicate a failure, it's triggered by either a timer or an internal odometer set to a certain interval that they suggest the O2 sensors be changed out. It's more of a reminder light than a failure warning.
I doubt an O2 sensor would cause an issue as drastic as what you're seeing. They normally "fine tune" things, and besides, you're having issues before you even get into closed-loop mode.
I doubt an O2 sensor would cause an issue as drastic as what you're seeing. They normally "fine tune" things, and besides, you're having issues before you even get into closed-loop mode.
#113
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
so i rigged up a temporary injector harness with the BMW stuff i had. no change whatsoever.
i dont think you guys understand just how rich im talking about here. it runs SO rich that i drained 5 gallons in about an hours worth of idling. my supercharged GP doesnt drain 5 gallons in an hour of driving.
i dont think you guys understand just how rich im talking about here. it runs SO rich that i drained 5 gallons in about an hours worth of idling. my supercharged GP doesnt drain 5 gallons in an hour of driving.
#114
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
so i rigged up a temporary injector harness with the BMW stuff i had. no change whatsoever.
i dont think you guys understand just how rich im talking about here. it runs SO rich that i drained 5 gallons in about an hours worth of idling. my supercharged GP doesnt drain 5 gallons in an hour of driving.
i dont think you guys understand just how rich im talking about here. it runs SO rich that i drained 5 gallons in about an hours worth of idling. my supercharged GP doesnt drain 5 gallons in an hour of driving.
#115
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest USA
Posts: 24,823
Received 10,871 Likes
on
7,150 Posts
#116
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
negative. but the seller assured me that its a new pump, and that its got good fuel pressure.
i should really check it myself though.
also, what does everyones jag do when you disconnect the injector harness while running? does the engine race up to about 2k and then die, or does it just shut off?
cause mine races up to about 2k and then dies, which kinda of makes me curios as to the water tightness of the injectors when theyre closed, I.E. upon start up.
i should really check it myself though.
also, what does everyones jag do when you disconnect the injector harness while running? does the engine race up to about 2k and then die, or does it just shut off?
cause mine races up to about 2k and then dies, which kinda of makes me curios as to the water tightness of the injectors when theyre closed, I.E. upon start up.
#117
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest USA
Posts: 24,823
Received 10,871 Likes
on
7,150 Posts
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The concern here would be too much pressure due to a faulty regulator. This could easily cause massive over-fueling.
i should really check it myself though.
Yes! You'll have to cut the left side fuel hose and insert a "tee" for your pressure gauge....then replace the hose when you're done. It's the hose the attaches to the left side of the fuel rail, sorta towards the rear.
also, what does everyones jag do when you disconnect the injector harness while running? does the engine race up to about 2k and then die, or does it just shut off?
cause mine races up to about 2k and then dies, which kinda of makes me curios as to the water tightness of the injectors when theyre closed, I.E. upon start up.
cause mine races up to about 2k and then dies, which kinda of makes me curios as to the water tightness of the injectors when theyre closed, I.E. upon start up.
yeah, drippy injectors. Or there's a great heaping load of fuel in the combustion chambers. When additional fuel is stopped (by unplugging the harness) you're burning the existing fuel....and for a moment there the engine clears its throat and takes off.
Cheers
DD
#120