XJS ( X27 ) 1975 - 1996 3.6 4.0 5.3 6.0

Spark Knock, Timing, and Octane

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 05-02-2024, 03:17 PM
RGK20m3's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2023
Location: Clarkston, MI
Posts: 95
Received 77 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mguar
No you are wrong. America uses MON + RON divided by 2.
You should not have vacuum advance. ( if it’s an HE ). The HE distributor gives you vacuum retard ( hence the doggy acceleration ). Plus the source of Knock.
That is the definition of AKI…..
 
  #22  
Old 05-02-2024, 10:17 PM
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Adelaide Stralia
Posts: 27,554
Received 10,478 Likes on 6,919 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RGK20m3
“Drive time” is essentially what I have done; Grant, it would be interesting to see where your timing is compared to the 18deg spec.
HA, had that thought many times, and never got that brave. Whizzy bits at 3000rpm, in my face, and me with one eye, NOT HAPPENING.

Add to that, the timiing plates are not there anymore on any of them, another oil leak solved, duh.

More importantly, the engine is HAPPY, the owner is HAPPY, why mess with that.



 
The following 4 users liked this post by Grant Francis:
Chap1958 (05-13-2024), Greg in France (05-03-2024), JJS- Florida (05-04-2024), smgdata (06-27-2024)
  #23  
Old 05-03-2024, 06:03 AM
RGK20m3's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2023
Location: Clarkston, MI
Posts: 95
Received 77 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

I like your thinking!
I guess the point of this is what applied to a newly manufactured engine 35 years ago, before ethanol and oxygenated fuels, probably doesn’t apply now. Obviously best performance is determined by timing to the verge of spark knock, at the speeds normally operated at.
For a long time, before fuel prices shot up, I ran mid grade (89AKI) and premium (91AKI) and still had spark knock occasionally; I had drive timed it and don’t think it was much advanced from where it is now, perhaps a degree or two.
This car is driven daily, year round so fuel cost is a factor for me.
 
  #24  
Old 05-03-2024, 06:37 AM
uspurs's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 54
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RGK20m3
Just about all fuel in Michigan,USA is E10 and “oxygenated”, whether regular or premium. Only fuel that is ethanol free is for off road use and carries a huge price premium. I get what others are saying “if it spark knocks, needs more octane “. But I think Jaguar knew what they were doing when they specified 87 octane….wondering if anyone has knowledge that E10 or oxygenated fuels may cause spark knock.
Or maybe there is something going on that I haven’t checked.
Fwiw, I use this website and try to go with ethanol-free, where possible, here in NY - there are supposedly several hundred gas stations in MI carrying ethanol-free:
https://www.pure-gas.org/
 
  #25  
Old 05-03-2024, 07:34 AM
Doug's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest USA
Posts: 24,823
Received 10,872 Likes on 7,151 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RGK20m3
I like your thinking!
I guess the point of this is what applied to a newly manufactured engine 35 years ago, before ethanol and oxygenated fuels, probably doesn’t apply now. Obviously best performance is determined by timing to the verge of spark knock, at the speeds normally operated at.
For a long time, before fuel prices shot up, I ran mid grade (89AKI) and premium (91AKI) and still had spark knock occasionally; I had drive timed it and don’t think it was much advanced from where it is now, perhaps a degree or two.
This car is driven daily, year round so fuel cost is a factor for me.
FWIW, I've been using 92AKI E10 for years and never have any knocking.

TBH, I can't remember where I set the timing; too many years ago.

Are you sure you don't have a "carbon knock" problem?

Cheers
DD
 
  #26  
Old 05-03-2024, 08:59 AM
Mguar's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 1,076
Received 371 Likes on 270 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by uspurs
Fwiw, I use this website and try to go with ethanol-free, where possible, here in NY - there are supposedly several hundred gas stations in MI carrying ethanol-free:
https://www.pure-gas.org/
you are missing out on a good thing. Race cars use ethanol for additional power over Gasoline. Ask I’ll explain why that is.
They also use it to minimize deposits in the engine.

If you burn a small amount of gasoline in a glass bowl you will see the deposits it makes. Burn the same amount of Ethanol and there will be no deposits. In fact if you burn it in the same glass bowl you will notice a reduction in deposits.
Ethanol is also a cooling agent. Put a little ethanol on your arm and feel how cool it is as it evaporates.
Finally. You drink ethanol every time you drink a Beer , Glass of wine, or any alcoholic drink( Scotch, Bourbon, Gin etc.
 
  #27  
Old 05-03-2024, 09:08 AM
Mguar's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 1,076
Received 371 Likes on 270 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ptjs1
RGK20m3,

It may be different in the US, but in the UK, the Premium Fuels not only have a higher RON octane level, but have a number of additives, particularly detergents which can benefit the engine and PI system, and much lower levels of Ethanol. The Premium Fuels are 0-5% ethanol content, compared to the 10% ethanol in the lower octane fuels.

So for me, it's not just about the octane level as to why I use the Premium fuels. And whilst they also may benefit the fuel consumption, that's not really the reason I use them.

Cheers

Paul
Paul. Ethanol is the magic elixir.
For peak power racers use As much ethanol as they can. Indy 500 cars use 100% ethanol, NASCAR uses 15% ethanol. Other racing groups put cars running ethanol in faster classes.
Second Ethanol is a wonderful cleaning agent. That’s why it’s commonly used in hospitals
Third. Ethanol is a cooling agent.
4th you drink ethanol in every beer, wine or alcoholic beverage such as Scotch, Bourbon, Gin Etc.
 
  #28  
Old 05-03-2024, 10:33 AM
RGK20m3's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2023
Location: Clarkston, MI
Posts: 95
Received 77 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Doug
FWIW, I've been using 92AKI E10 for years and never have any knocking.

TBH, I can't remember where I set the timing; too many years ago.

Are you sure you don't have a "carbon knock" problem?

Cheers
DD
Don’t believe it is carbon, but could be a myriad of other issues. I have some recent experience with the TPS signal in a Rover V8; changing the TPS reading changes which cell in the fueling map is used, thereby affecting mixture. That Lucas system (14CUX) isn’t far removed from the 16CU in the XJ-S in operation. Perhaps I have a lean condition? Maybe an air temperature or coolant temperature fault? Sure wish I had a method to display data in real time, like what RoverGauge provides.
Could be the vacuum capsule provides too much advance for a given vacuum, or the centrifugal advance springs are weak or wrong.
 

Last edited by RGK20m3; 05-03-2024 at 10:35 AM. Reason: More
  #29  
Old 05-03-2024, 02:43 PM
Mguar's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 1,076
Received 371 Likes on 270 Posts
Default

The best solution rather than blindly replacing parts is to put it on a chassis Dyno. ( I believe the British call them rolling roads. ).
I’ve stoped using them for the race cars. It’s $125 I no longer need to spend. Instead I put O2 sensors in every exhaust pipe ( I use 4 on the normally aspirated race car and 2 on the turbocharged race car.). and watch the fuel mixture. I go for 13.7-9 on gasoline and 9.0 using E85.
My distributors go on my Sun distributor machine. And I just check that they spin up and give a steady spark. Racing never goes below about 3800rpm. And that’s above the spark advance. Putting around n the pits I’m at a steady state in first gear and everything is a rolling start.
 
  #30  
Old 05-03-2024, 04:09 PM
Doug's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest USA
Posts: 24,823
Received 10,872 Likes on 7,151 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RGK20m3
Don’t believe it is carbon, but could be a myriad of other issues. I have some recent experience with the TPS signal in a Rover V8; changing the TPS reading changes which cell in the fueling map is used, thereby affecting mixture. That Lucas system (14CUX) isn’t far removed from the 16CU in the XJ-S in operation. Perhaps I have a lean condition? Maybe an air temperature or coolant temperature fault? Sure wish I had a method to display data in real time, like what RoverGauge provides.
Could be the vacuum capsule provides too much advance for a given vacuum, or the centrifugal advance springs are weak or wrong.

Idea:

Closing the enrichment switch on the throttle capstan or unplugging the air temp sensor will richen the mixture 8-10% or so. my be worth a try if you suspect you're running a tad lean?

Cheers
DD
 
The following 3 users liked this post by Doug:
Greg in France (05-04-2024), JJS- Florida (05-04-2024), RGK20m3 (05-03-2024)
  #31  
Old 05-03-2024, 04:41 PM
RGK20m3's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2023
Location: Clarkston, MI
Posts: 95
Received 77 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

I did check the enrichment switch (good) and the vacuum switch (closes at 2.5” hg). Good idea to try IAT unplug and shorting enrichment switch as a test.
Funny that if you are watching the travel computer instantaneous display, 75 mph, mileage shows 20 on flat ground- slight incline and the spark knock is continuous. Give it a little more throttle and spark knock disappears as traveler shows 10 mpg. This is 2700-3000 rpm, right at the knee in the centrifugal advance curve.
A buddy of mine used to have a Sun distributor machine….
 
  #32  
Old 05-03-2024, 05:22 PM
alpecsa's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Hi to all, I own a 1988 and a 1989 MY XJ-S V12 USA specs Jaguars, I have both DRIVERS HANDBOOKS which show the following, first the one on the 88 and next the one on the 89... They say almost the same thing, but the later a little bit more easy to get straight...


So I go with 87 octane...

Alfredo
 
The following 2 users liked this post by alpecsa:
Dleit53 (05-08-2024), RGK20m3 (05-03-2024)
  #33  
Old 05-08-2024, 08:09 AM
Dleit53's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Shiawassee County, Michigan, USA
Posts: 355
Received 143 Likes on 106 Posts
Default

My 83 HE runs fine on US 87 pump octane. There's no audible knock. Timing is over advanced a few degrees. Centrifugal and vacuum advance both are operational.
In the US, top tier fuel contains additional detergents and avoids additives that promote deposits, see the list at topteirgas.com. you don't have to buy higher octane premium to get better quality.
 
The following users liked this post:
RGK20m3 (05-08-2024)
  #34  
Old 05-21-2024, 08:01 AM
RGK20m3's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2023
Location: Clarkston, MI
Posts: 95
Received 77 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

Well, I believe that I have solved the issue. I tried a couple of tanks of mid grade (89 AKI) without noticeable change. I decided to recheck the components in the vacuum advance system individually (advance capsule, vacuum reducer, and dump valve) and all seemed to operate correctly; I then checked them on the car and all seemed to work. As all the spark knock seemed triggered by throttle tip in, I started thinking about how the ported vacuum affected the vacuum advance…..
My ‘88 has 2 ports on top of each throttle body; on the right (where the advance connects) one of the ports is capped. The underhood vacuum diagrams and the V12 Focus manual do not show this. I connected vacuum gauges to each port and slowly opened the throttle, and noted a slight difference in how the gauges performed.
Switched the vacuum reducer connection to the rear most port (was on the front one), bumped the timing back to 18 degrees at 3000 rpm, and spark knock is mostly gone.
 
The following 3 users liked this post by RGK20m3:
Doug (05-21-2024), Greg in France (05-21-2024), Peter3442 (05-21-2024)
  #35  
Old 05-21-2024, 07:27 PM
MooseOHJ's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RGK20m3
Well, I believe that I have solved the issue. I tried a couple of tanks of mid grade (89 AKI) without noticeable change. I decided to recheck the components in the vacuum advance system individually (advance capsule, vacuum reducer, and dump valve) and all seemed to operate correctly; I then checked them on the car and all seemed to work. As all the spark knock seemed triggered by throttle tip in, I started thinking about how the ported vacuum affected the vacuum advance…..
My ‘88 has 2 ports on top of each throttle body; on the right (where the advance connects) one of the ports is capped. The underhood vacuum diagrams and the V12 Focus manual do not show this. I connected vacuum gauges to each port and slowly opened the throttle, and noted a slight difference in how the gauges performed.
Switched the vacuum reducer connection to the rear most port (was on the front one), bumped the timing back to 18 degrees at 3000 rpm, and spark knock is mostly gone.
So do you suspect weak vacuum at the original port? Leaky port? Blocked port?
 
  #36  
Old 05-21-2024, 08:44 PM
RGK20m3's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2023
Location: Clarkston, MI
Posts: 95
Received 77 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

I think its position or diameter affects how much vacuum vs how far the throttle is opened. Sure made a difference. The way the reducer works is manifold vacuum is regulated to 11” until port vacuum exceeds that value, so the relation to throttle opening is critical.
 
  #37  
Old 05-22-2024, 10:58 AM
RGK20m3's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2023
Location: Clarkston, MI
Posts: 95
Received 77 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

***Edit**** The vacuum hose going to the vacuum reducer is now connected to the front port (was on the rear port).
The vacuum present at each port differs at what throttle position vacuum starts, and vacuum level up to 10”, where they start to have identical readings.
 
  #38  
Old 06-27-2024, 07:34 PM
RGK20m3's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2023
Location: Clarkston, MI
Posts: 95
Received 77 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

Here is where I am now; I have the distributor advance unit connected to the rear port on the right intake, and am not using the vacuum reducer or dump valve. I still had a moment of spark knock on throttle tip in, even with the timing retarded a degree or two. I believe that the vacuum was not dumping quickly enough with the reducer in the circuit. By connecting directly to the port, vacuum drops immediately, albeit there is no vacuum advance at idle. I just set the idle higher on the AAV to compensate.
I had the thought that vehicles equipped with the reducer and dump valves require a bleed hole in the advance unit, and I still had the original (JLM519?) which I dissected. No evidence of a bleed. Thought about a filtered bleed like was used on some Mopars, but could not locate one. Also remembered that when I had the current advance unit built, I requested a heavy duty diaphragm, which may slow the movement of the advance.
Anyway, timing set to 18@300, idle at 600, and got15mpg combined on the last tank- happy!
 
The following 2 users liked this post by RGK20m3:
Grant Francis (06-27-2024), Greg in France (06-28-2024)
  #39  
Old 06-27-2024, 08:30 PM
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Adelaide Stralia
Posts: 27,554
Received 10,478 Likes on 6,919 Posts
Default

Well done.

I am SO happy I am down here. NO emissions stuff, NO vac reducer etc etc.

One vac line, capsule to RH underside port on engine side of throttle disc, and the car luvs me, what more can I ask??
 
The following users liked this post:
Greg in France (06-28-2024)
  #40  
Old 06-28-2024, 02:04 AM
Greg in France's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: France
Posts: 13,456
Received 9,251 Likes on 5,433 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Grant Francis
Well done.
One vac line, capsule to RH underside port on engine side of throttle disc, and the car luvs me, what more can I ask??
Me too. This was recommended by David Marks (UK Jaguar specialist and JEC adviser) at an XJS seminar held by the JEC. Direct vac capsule to the under-TB port on A bank. It has worked perfectly for years and all that tube rubbish, timers; and funny little gizmos nobody understands are gone.
 
The following users liked this post:
Grant Francis (06-28-2024)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
WaterDragon
XJ XJ8 / XJR ( X308 )
7
05-03-2024 12:52 PM
rgp
XJS ( X27 )
23
02-18-2023 11:42 AM
smgdata
XJ6 & XJ12 Series I, II & III
10
10-13-2016 07:08 AM
Sir Jagness
XJ XJ8 / XJR ( X308 )
19
09-28-2014 10:14 AM
dtony
XJS ( X27 )
11
05-05-2014 06:54 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: Spark Knock, Timing, and Octane



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:50 PM.