Torque converter for faster takeoff?
#21
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
>> 2020 C8 Corvette
Looks like it came in a cornflake box.
I had been vaguely wondering about swapping the entire trans, although it's money I hadn't intended to spend. But the more I learn the more I think it's the part that can do the most for the car.
@VancouverXJ6, about fit, these 6 and 8-speed units don't have more "gears", they just engage overdrive on every gear. IOW they use it to split each ratio, enabling taller spreads. The casting looks, by eyeballing pics on t'internet, _about the same shape and size_
Now all I need is a Mord Fustang that some princeling has wrapped around a tree. In fact, since they all end up wrapped around a tree, maybe I'll sneak out in the night with the oxy torch, it's a public service taking them off the road
Looks like it came in a cornflake box.
I had been vaguely wondering about swapping the entire trans, although it's money I hadn't intended to spend. But the more I learn the more I think it's the part that can do the most for the car.
@VancouverXJ6, about fit, these 6 and 8-speed units don't have more "gears", they just engage overdrive on every gear. IOW they use it to split each ratio, enabling taller spreads. The casting looks, by eyeballing pics on t'internet, _about the same shape and size_
Now all I need is a Mord Fustang that some princeling has wrapped around a tree. In fact, since they all end up wrapped around a tree, maybe I'll sneak out in the night with the oxy torch, it's a public service taking them off the road
The following users liked this post:
ronbros (03-01-2021)
#23
#24
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
To document what I learn as I go along, in the hope of helping the next fool:
My earlier idea that I could use the TC lockup to let me fit a higher-stall TC, but have it act like a more sedate unit when not needed, appears to be rubbish. TC stall is a mechanical property, and attempting to use the TC clutch to switch it on and off is asking for a burnt-out TC clutch, unless of course I'm spending a fortune on a TC with massive clutch... at silly money, which I won't spend. Maaaybe recent hi-tech units do clever stuff with TC lockup, but - for pre-2000s TCs at least: TCs lock up when you're crusing in top gear, and anything else is really fighting the OEM design. I believe the locking TC was introduced with the 4L80 in the facelift, so for owners with '88s, no soup for you.
Somone on t'internet mentioned that the facelift models have a TC with stall around 2600-2800 anyway, and since the V12 in factory tune makes peak torque at about 2800, a higher-stall TC is a trading money, fuel economy, TC temperature and driveability for very little return. Although, Ronbros talking about lighter TC and flywheel is obvious sense, as rotating mass is by far the best weight to lose if you want to liven up the beast.
The 6-speeds are interesting. For those who don't know, a 4-speed auto is the same thing as a 3-speed with overdrive; the 4th gear is achieved by engaging the OD when you're in 3rd. The 6-speeds go one further and engage the OD in each gear, giving you the sequence 1 - 1 OD - 2 - 2 OD - 3 - 3 OD. And this can be done with the 4L80E with not-too-complex electronics (although you'd surely also modify the valve body if you want a good result). It would be pointless unless you also change the ratios - that's because the problem isn't that the gears are too far apart from each other, it's that first gear is too tall but I'm not willing to have a shorter 4th and higher cruise RPMs; if I were OK with 3000 rpm on the motorway, I could find a 3.73 or 4.10 diff and be done with it. What I want is a greater overall spread, so you'd do the 6-speed conversion while also swapping the planetary gearset for one with a 2.97 first or more. Unfortunately, those gearsets are rare and pricey. Further, fitting that shorter gearset would increase the distance between the gears to a probably-unacceptable amount, which is a common complaint about the 4L60 box (which has a shorter first than the 4L80).
So, while it would techincally be possible for an owner to convert their 4L80e to a six-speed with a drill bit, a few springs and an aftermarket TCM (transmission controller), you'd be lacking in the gearset to take advantage of the mod and you'd be missing out on the R&D needed to get the shifts working well. You would do better to just f'n buy the TCI six-speed at around £5000 and figure out who can ship it to the UK for you. And I suspect this is a reasonable use of the money, if you want a great restomod.
Another option is the "second overdrive" which bolts on the back of the trans. Those cost US$3000 and also need a shorter driveshaft. They are usually overdrive, not underdrive, so you then also need a shorter diff, maybe a 4.10. That would give you a wider spread without sacrificing final drive in top. This adds complexity, needs to fit under the car, adds heat and saps a tiny bit of power... but hey, you don't need to muck with the box itself.
Another thing I've learned is that it's possible to adjust line pressure - such that you can switch between stock soft shifts and firmer sportier ones - if you are willing to muck about with PWM control. I don't think there's an option on the market, you'd have to homebrew.
So this is my plan:
- lighten the flywheel, just get it machined out a bit
- fit a custom shifter that has a bump-shift mode
- wire up some dumb electronics to achieve full manual; bypass the stock TCM when in manual mode
- rig up some PWM control to increase line pressure while in full manual
- NOT spend money on the transmission hardware
- drive the car for a bit
- if I really feel the lack of a shorter first gear over time, then I'll use a lot of very long socket extensions to get at the bell housing bolts in situ, and drop the box out from under the car without pulling the engine. Since the engine and box are currently apart, and since this will happen in the next five years if at all, you'd hope that they'll come apart OK.
My earlier idea that I could use the TC lockup to let me fit a higher-stall TC, but have it act like a more sedate unit when not needed, appears to be rubbish. TC stall is a mechanical property, and attempting to use the TC clutch to switch it on and off is asking for a burnt-out TC clutch, unless of course I'm spending a fortune on a TC with massive clutch... at silly money, which I won't spend. Maaaybe recent hi-tech units do clever stuff with TC lockup, but - for pre-2000s TCs at least: TCs lock up when you're crusing in top gear, and anything else is really fighting the OEM design. I believe the locking TC was introduced with the 4L80 in the facelift, so for owners with '88s, no soup for you.
Somone on t'internet mentioned that the facelift models have a TC with stall around 2600-2800 anyway, and since the V12 in factory tune makes peak torque at about 2800, a higher-stall TC is a trading money, fuel economy, TC temperature and driveability for very little return. Although, Ronbros talking about lighter TC and flywheel is obvious sense, as rotating mass is by far the best weight to lose if you want to liven up the beast.
The 6-speeds are interesting. For those who don't know, a 4-speed auto is the same thing as a 3-speed with overdrive; the 4th gear is achieved by engaging the OD when you're in 3rd. The 6-speeds go one further and engage the OD in each gear, giving you the sequence 1 - 1 OD - 2 - 2 OD - 3 - 3 OD. And this can be done with the 4L80E with not-too-complex electronics (although you'd surely also modify the valve body if you want a good result). It would be pointless unless you also change the ratios - that's because the problem isn't that the gears are too far apart from each other, it's that first gear is too tall but I'm not willing to have a shorter 4th and higher cruise RPMs; if I were OK with 3000 rpm on the motorway, I could find a 3.73 or 4.10 diff and be done with it. What I want is a greater overall spread, so you'd do the 6-speed conversion while also swapping the planetary gearset for one with a 2.97 first or more. Unfortunately, those gearsets are rare and pricey. Further, fitting that shorter gearset would increase the distance between the gears to a probably-unacceptable amount, which is a common complaint about the 4L60 box (which has a shorter first than the 4L80).
So, while it would techincally be possible for an owner to convert their 4L80e to a six-speed with a drill bit, a few springs and an aftermarket TCM (transmission controller), you'd be lacking in the gearset to take advantage of the mod and you'd be missing out on the R&D needed to get the shifts working well. You would do better to just f'n buy the TCI six-speed at around £5000 and figure out who can ship it to the UK for you. And I suspect this is a reasonable use of the money, if you want a great restomod.
Another option is the "second overdrive" which bolts on the back of the trans. Those cost US$3000 and also need a shorter driveshaft. They are usually overdrive, not underdrive, so you then also need a shorter diff, maybe a 4.10. That would give you a wider spread without sacrificing final drive in top. This adds complexity, needs to fit under the car, adds heat and saps a tiny bit of power... but hey, you don't need to muck with the box itself.
Another thing I've learned is that it's possible to adjust line pressure - such that you can switch between stock soft shifts and firmer sportier ones - if you are willing to muck about with PWM control. I don't think there's an option on the market, you'd have to homebrew.
So this is my plan:
- lighten the flywheel, just get it machined out a bit
- fit a custom shifter that has a bump-shift mode
- wire up some dumb electronics to achieve full manual; bypass the stock TCM when in manual mode
- rig up some PWM control to increase line pressure while in full manual
- NOT spend money on the transmission hardware
- drive the car for a bit
- if I really feel the lack of a shorter first gear over time, then I'll use a lot of very long socket extensions to get at the bell housing bolts in situ, and drop the box out from under the car without pulling the engine. Since the engine and box are currently apart, and since this will happen in the next five years if at all, you'd hope that they'll come apart OK.
#25
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Oh BTW @VancouverXJ6 , I'm in the UK, parts availability is very different. The car "scene" is predicated on small-displacement manual cars - your Civics and Golfs. It's only in the last decade that the US mfrs really started pushing cars here - now you see these plastic mustang-in-name-only things everywhere. Oh yeah, we got Chrysler 300Cs in spades too when they were a thing. But it's a challenge getting a big US gearbox, and the mustangs are generally not yet on the scrap heap. I can count the 6L80s and 6R80s on ebay on the fingers of one foot.
Last edited by fried_hippies; 03-02-2021 at 06:42 AM. Reason: detail
#26
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Oh BTW @VancouverXJ6 , I'm in the UK, parts availability is very different. The car "scene" is predicated on small-displacement manual cars - your Civics and Golfs. It's only in the last decade that the US mfrs really started pushing cars here - now you see these plastic mustang-in-name-only things everywhere. Oh yeah, we got Chrysler 300Cs in spades too when they were a thing. But it's a challenge getting a big US gearbox, and the mustangs are generally not yet on the scrap heap. I can count the 6L80s and 6R80s on ebay on the fingers of one foot.
Jag should have used this trans but I suspect GM wouldn't allow that becasue it would have made the Jag far more competitive with the Corvette and Jag probably wanted something close to ZERO for warranty claims for a transmission they didn't make. The early 700R4's did have some issues but by the early 90's they were far more stout.
https://dellowconversions.com.au/pro...ine-adaptor-2/
This company makes and adapter.
Last edited by icsamerica; 03-02-2021 at 09:13 AM.
The following users liked this post:
fried_hippies (03-10-2021)
#27
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I had considered it, vaguely but not seriously, because:
- all the reading I'm able to find is written by US-based enthusiasts, and they tend to disparage it - possibly because they're building 500hp lumps with narrow power bands, quite the opposite of the low-tune Jag
- needs that adapter plate (I'm betting the bolt pattern is different between the 5.3 and the 6.0, but that's easily fixed by a machine shop)
- I got the impression that they don't support a locking TC, and since I expect to do a lot of motorway miles that's a major downside - HOWEVER, I now think this is incorrect and they do have locking TCs
Maybe I need to think about it some more.
There are a couple on ebay UK right now for under £500. I'd expect to rebuild it, give it a stronger sprag or whatever. So with the rebuild kit and adapter I guess we're getting up to £1000, which is probably alright.
It's a bit shorter than the 4L80, so I'll need spacers for the driveshaft. I was amazed by the weight of the driveshaft anyway, so perhaps that can get a replacement that's lighter and a touch longer? We're getting a bit over my planned budget but, hey, as long as the wife gets a foreign holiday this year she won't care ;-)
I could rebuild it knowing that if I fk it up, at least I have the original to put back into the car. It's also about 30Kg lighter. For a switchable full manual, it'll have to be the 4L60e, as that has electronic control.
I did always wonder why JLR used the 4L80 when it's so massively overspecced.
Cheers for the idea @icsamerica
- all the reading I'm able to find is written by US-based enthusiasts, and they tend to disparage it - possibly because they're building 500hp lumps with narrow power bands, quite the opposite of the low-tune Jag
- needs that adapter plate (I'm betting the bolt pattern is different between the 5.3 and the 6.0, but that's easily fixed by a machine shop)
- I got the impression that they don't support a locking TC, and since I expect to do a lot of motorway miles that's a major downside - HOWEVER, I now think this is incorrect and they do have locking TCs
Maybe I need to think about it some more.
There are a couple on ebay UK right now for under £500. I'd expect to rebuild it, give it a stronger sprag or whatever. So with the rebuild kit and adapter I guess we're getting up to £1000, which is probably alright.
It's a bit shorter than the 4L80, so I'll need spacers for the driveshaft. I was amazed by the weight of the driveshaft anyway, so perhaps that can get a replacement that's lighter and a touch longer? We're getting a bit over my planned budget but, hey, as long as the wife gets a foreign holiday this year she won't care ;-)
I could rebuild it knowing that if I fk it up, at least I have the original to put back into the car. It's also about 30Kg lighter. For a switchable full manual, it'll have to be the 4L60e, as that has electronic control.
I did always wonder why JLR used the 4L80 when it's so massively overspecced.
Cheers for the idea @icsamerica
#28
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
For completeness, factory ratios:
4L60:
3.06 1.63 1.00 0.70
4L80:
2.48 1.48 1.00 0.75
Sweet, that'll get me 80mph at about 1900 rpm or so - very comfortable. I won't even touch the 3.54 diff.
That's a huge gap from 1st to 2nd, but... hold 1st to 5400 rpm where the power peaks, then 2nd will kick in at 2850 where the torque peaks - I'm starting to like this idea more and more!
No wonder the guys with narrower power bands don't like it, but yeah, looks great for the Jag with the stock cam.
4L60:
3.06 1.63 1.00 0.70
4L80:
2.48 1.48 1.00 0.75
Sweet, that'll get me 80mph at about 1900 rpm or so - very comfortable. I won't even touch the 3.54 diff.
That's a huge gap from 1st to 2nd, but... hold 1st to 5400 rpm where the power peaks, then 2nd will kick in at 2850 where the torque peaks - I'm starting to like this idea more and more!
No wonder the guys with narrower power bands don't like it, but yeah, looks great for the Jag with the stock cam.
#29
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Ha, here's ronbros and warrjon talking about it, good enough for them, good enough for me!
https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/x...e-swap-167463/
Jaguar XJS Restoration : XJS V12 4L60e Conversion
https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/x...e-swap-167463/
Jaguar XJS Restoration : XJS V12 4L60e Conversion
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
phd12volt
S-Type / S type R Supercharged V8 ( X200 )
1
03-18-2009 09:06 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)