XJS ( X27 ) 1975 - 1996 3.6 4.0 5.3 6.0

XJS Hatchback

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 11-08-2019, 05:03 PM
ptjs1's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Kent, UK
Posts: 4,088
Received 3,156 Likes on 2,078 Posts
Default XJS Hatchback

I've just got back from the UK's biggest Classic Car Show.

One of the cars on display was this intriguing XJS Hatchback creation shown below. It was designed and created by an ex-Jaguar employee and is the second version that he has built.

The hatchback is from an Audi TT, turned upside down and then fabricated around the edges to fit the opening. The first car he built used the tailgate from an MGB.

It may split opinion but it's a wonderful piece of work and is beautifully finished. It has folding rear seats and a nice flat loading bay all trimmed in lovely wine-coloured carpet

There's also a third one in the UK that uses some Citroen parts.

Paul

opoening
 
The following 2 users liked this post by ptjs1:
ralphwg (11-08-2019), Timeisrelative (11-08-2019)
  #2  
Old 11-08-2019, 05:15 PM
Bez74's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: QLD
Posts: 367
Received 229 Likes on 148 Posts
Default

That is very nice and I like it

Any idea what he did with the fuel tank and the other stuff normally in the boot?

Cheers
Steve
 
  #3  
Old 11-08-2019, 05:22 PM
ptjs1's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Kent, UK
Posts: 4,088
Received 3,156 Likes on 2,078 Posts
Default

Steve,

He built a flat floor raised to the height of the lower edge of the boot hatchback closing. The floor is a beautifully-trimmed carpeted panel with stainless steel runners. The panel list up to access a storage compartment and a bespoke fuel tank.

Paul
 
  #4  
Old 11-08-2019, 08:19 PM
Spikepaga's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,986
Received 559 Likes on 382 Posts
Default

Nice. I am not a fan of the aesthetic, but it certainly looks like a professional, factory-quality job.
 
  #5  
Old 11-08-2019, 11:11 PM
Alan E L's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Delegate NSW Australia
Posts: 152
Received 50 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

I think it looks great.
A bit of creativity is a good thing
Al
 
  #6  
Old 11-09-2019, 01:51 AM
Some Day, Some Day's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Japan
Posts: 2,047
Received 1,049 Likes on 668 Posts
Default

I think the spoiler's worse than the hatchback, myself. Looks like a Guy Salmon paintjob and aero, but maybe not.

Is this the same guy who built THIS ONE? Seems like it. I think I prefer the look with the facelift rear - the more rounded rear helps.
 
  #7  
Old 11-09-2019, 02:51 AM
ptjs1's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Kent, UK
Posts: 4,088
Received 3,156 Likes on 2,078 Posts
Default

That's the guy! I also preferred the bkue facelift conversion. I felt the flatter glass of the MGB hatch suited the car better, but both cars are really well-done and a credit to him.

The latest one is a TWR car with standard factory spoiler. The whole car needed a lot of remedial bodywork. A huge amount of effort went into the build.

Paul
 
  #8  
Old 11-09-2019, 09:01 AM
anyoldiron's Avatar
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: BC
Posts: 191
Received 114 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Some Day, Some Day
I think the spoiler's worse than the hatchback, myself. Looks like a Guy Salmon paintjob and aero, but maybe not.

Is this the same guy who built THIS ONE? Seems like it. I think I prefer the look with the facelift rear - the more rounded rear helps.
,

With the first car i think that body kit makes the XJS look like a kit car, this look is exacerbated by the spoiler mounted in a manner that looks cockeyed. The hatchback itself doesn't look right, it seems to be too rounded where the uprights run along the buttresses and makes the panel gap huge. lt just looks like a add on.

Your attached car looks like factory, i agree it works very well with the face-lift models rounded lines. The execution on that is superb.

 
The following users liked this post:
Some Day, Some Day (11-09-2019)
  #9  
Old 11-09-2019, 09:54 AM
ptjs1's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Kent, UK
Posts: 4,088
Received 3,156 Likes on 2,078 Posts
Default

The bodykit is standard TWR and the rear spoiler is a standard factory item. I understand that they are a personal choice, including the standard TWR two-tone paint job.

If you have a front-end write-off, you could perhaps do this!

 
The following users liked this post:
Some Day, Some Day (11-09-2019)
  #10  
Old 11-09-2019, 03:09 PM
Alan E L's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Delegate NSW Australia
Posts: 152
Received 50 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Hi all,
Having now looked at the earlier MGB GT based conversion, I do prefer that one, although without seeing the cars in the 'flesh' it's hard to judge.
With the success of the hatch back concept with Jaguar's stablemates, MG and Rover, both making very stylish cars with that feature, it is a shame that Jaguar did not make a version, particularly when these XJSs show how easily it could have been done, and how ascetically pleasing the result.
I applaud the creativity of those who start with an oxy torch and angle grinder and create these custom vehicles. Certainly some are abominations, totally tasteless or poorly thought out and badly executed. Others a brilliant windows into what could have been.
The purist may decry the destruction of a vehicle as it was created. Obviously few would agree with the 'chopping' of an extremely rare vehicle, say, a genuine Ford GT 40 ( if anyone was both wealthy and stupid enough to do so) but for cars as common ( I use than term very carefully and mean no slight against these magnificent GT Jaguars) creative modification of a few examples only heightens the interest in the breed and ensures the preservation and continuation of them.

As an aside I must comment on how disappointed I am that such a brilliant and beautiful car, designed an epoch ago in the early 70s, was not further developed by the moribund Leyland and later owners with more gearbox options, hatches, as demonstrated by the car that inspired this thread, a roadster from inception and perhaps higher performance sports models!

Regards
Al
 
  #11  
Old 11-09-2019, 04:00 PM
Some Day, Some Day's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Japan
Posts: 2,047
Received 1,049 Likes on 668 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ptjs1
If you have a front-end write-off, you could perhaps do this!

Please tell me that this thing uses the original V12 as well! Or at least the straight six. A V12-powered trike with an XJS rear would be very impressive.
How the hell do you steer that thing? Those handlebars are so long that to make the front wheel turn slightly, you'd need to move the handles about six feet either side....
 
  #12  
Old 11-09-2019, 04:44 PM
Bez74's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: QLD
Posts: 367
Received 229 Likes on 148 Posts
Default

Yes - but at least the back seats are useable

We once put a chevy V8 in a bike frame (friend of ours) - that was a contraption and a halve - but nothing like that

Cheers
Steve
 
  #13  
Old 11-09-2019, 05:09 PM
Alan E L's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Delegate NSW Australia
Posts: 152
Received 50 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Hi Sreve,
It looks like the steering is by a set of rods that connect the handle bars to the trike's steering head some feet ahead of it.
What is the engine used? I can see it is a V12 but what species?
It would be a brave man to ride/ drive the contraption.
It is an offense against both man and nature but you have to admire the work that has gone into it
Al
 

Last edited by Alan E L; 11-09-2019 at 05:14 PM.
  #14  
Old 11-10-2019, 11:26 AM
anyoldiron's Avatar
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: BC
Posts: 191
Received 114 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ptjs1
The bodykit is standard TWR and the rear spoiler is a standard factory item. I understand that they are a personal choice, including the standard TWR two-tone paint job.

If you have a front-end write-off, you could perhaps do this!


So thats what happens when a King pikey meets Liberace
 
  #15  
Old 11-10-2019, 03:50 PM
Flint Ironstag's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,166
Received 415 Likes on 313 Posts
Default

I'm not seeing any hatchback. Is there a missing picture?
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Andreas Schmieg
XJS ( X27 )
6
11-18-2017 05:55 AM
Asdrewq
XJS ( X27 )
9
06-09-2016 12:25 PM
64vette
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
4
11-10-2015 02:22 PM
mrtalkradio
XJS ( X27 )
7
12-16-2011 01:42 PM
Donalds5
XJ6 & XJ12 Series I, II & III
3
12-02-2011 02:38 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: XJS Hatchback



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:56 AM.