600BHP+ results on 5.0 s/c
#21
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
If you are tuning this with your tuning company, I'm assuming they datalogged the before and after data values.
What psi were you achieving before vs now > What lambda was achieved before vs now? > What ignition timing was achieved before vs now?
If you can answer those questions, it would be much easier to diagnose what has been missed in the file edit OR what hardware needs to be repaired/resolved/upgraded..etc.
What psi were you achieving before vs now > What lambda was achieved before vs now? > What ignition timing was achieved before vs now?
If you can answer those questions, it would be much easier to diagnose what has been missed in the file edit OR what hardware needs to be repaired/resolved/upgraded..etc.
__________________
________________
Christopher Edgett
Technical Director
Velocity Automotive Performance Limited
214 Maple Ave.
Oliver, BC
Canada V0H 1T9
Office Tel: (250) 485-5126
www.VelocityAP.com
Tuning@VelocityAP.com
![](https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/signaturepics/sigpic170389_7.gif)
________________
Christopher Edgett
Technical Director
Velocity Automotive Performance Limited
214 Maple Ave.
Oliver, BC
Canada V0H 1T9
Office Tel: (250) 485-5126
www.VelocityAP.com
Tuning@VelocityAP.com
![](https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/signaturepics/sigpic170389_7.gif)
#22
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
With lower pulley and without tune adjustments car had very rich AFR (more like 12 vs 14.7). Psi was already changed as per pulley - if I recall properly 0.8 to 0.35 (in the peak). Which makes me feel that boost is "lost" somewhere (as per MoscowLeaper suggestion throttle plate in S/C). Now AFR is healthy. Don't recall values for ignition timing.
PS. I have water/meth injection (before throttle body). But did not have any issues with MAF sensor etc. So should be okay.
#23
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Of course, car was logged. However it will not be that easy. I changed lower pulley last year and tune was done this year. So no data log on previous "healthy" setup.
With lower pulley and without tune adjustments car had very rich AFR (more like 12 vs 14.7). Psi was already changed as per pulley - if I recall properly 0.8 to 0.35 (in the peak). Which makes me feel that boost is "lost" somewhere (as per MoscowLeaper suggestion throttle plate in S/C). Now AFR is healthy. Don't recall values for ignition timing.
PS. I have water/meth injection (before throttle body). But did not have any issues with MAF sensor etc. So should be okay.
With lower pulley and without tune adjustments car had very rich AFR (more like 12 vs 14.7). Psi was already changed as per pulley - if I recall properly 0.8 to 0.35 (in the peak). Which makes me feel that boost is "lost" somewhere (as per MoscowLeaper suggestion throttle plate in S/C). Now AFR is healthy. Don't recall values for ignition timing.
PS. I have water/meth injection (before throttle body). But did not have any issues with MAF sensor etc. So should be okay.
Also, there's a hardcoded limit of 1024Nm total (output torque+torque losses), which is a bit tricky to overcome
![Wink](https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/images/smilies/wink.gif)
Last edited by MoscowLeaper; 05-11-2023 at 03:53 PM.
The following users liked this post:
tmich (05-11-2023)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GoFaster
XF and XFR ( X250 )
13
10-22-2021 07:06 AM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)