XK / XKR ( X150 ) 2006 - 2014

Best Year XKR to buy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 12-24-2019, 09:10 AM
SinF's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Canada, eh
Posts: 6,987
Received 2,141 Likes on 1,461 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Queen and Country
And tattoos and cigarettes, but that is now.
To me young means social media influencers and clout-chasing.

On interior trim - aluminum and carbon fiber, unlike wood, is harder to passably fake. That is, I like real wood panels in a car, but aside from maybe Bently or Rolls Royce nobody does them this way anymore. Some of my classic BMW and Mercedes have real wood interior trim parts, I have been in a modern BMWs and Mercedes and it is all fake plastic that made to look like wood (and you have to be an aging Boomer with going eyesight not to notice the fake mile away). At the upper range you have wood veneer in epoxy instead of an actual wood. I would rather have lesser, but non-fake finish than fake wood or IKEA-like veneer on everything.

Personally, I prefer aluminum because - a) it is unlikely to be fake plastic b) it is more durable than fake plastic finishes c) it is light.
 

Last edited by SinF; 12-24-2019 at 09:19 AM.
  #22  
Old 12-24-2019, 10:02 AM
Cee Jay's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Kaysville, Utah, US
Posts: 10,852
Received 5,431 Likes on 3,207 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stuart S
............... Rich Oak veneer, which was unique to the 2009 XKR Portfolio.
My 2010 XKR is Rich Oak. Best looking veneer available, IMO
 
  #23  
Old 12-24-2019, 10:47 AM
Sean W's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 8,401
Received 4,256 Likes on 2,379 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SinF
I have been in a modern BMWs and Mercedes and it is all fake plastic that made to look like wood

Personally, I prefer aluminum because - a) it is unlikely to be fake plastic b) it is more durable than fake plastic finishes c) it is light.
I prefer the aluminum as well and would gladly swap with someone. Mine's currently wrapped in Dark brushed aluminum vinyl wrap that can be removed. If I ever see an ad from someone who wants to swap for my burl wood, I'll jump on it. Wood is so old fart, but this old fart doesn't like it and Jaguar goes nuts with it.

Regarding your comments about modern Mercedes wood being cheap plastic - not true. I recently had a dispute with MB US over some faded wood. They had a TSB regarding a series of cars (VINS) that had wood that wasn't treated with UV protection and caused fading. Since the car was CPO, I had to argue that it should never have been certified since wood condition was one of the checks. Can't speak to BMW though.
 
The following 2 users liked this post by Sean W:
MarkyUK (12-26-2019), SinF (12-30-2019)
  #24  
Old 12-24-2019, 03:03 PM
chazaroo's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Posts: 1,411
Received 120 Likes on 87 Posts
Default

I've had three XKs, not counting my current 2010 XKR. I guess I'm in the camp of finding the lowest mileage car you can afford. I'd rather have a 2010 with 20,000 miles than a 2014 with 50,000.
 
  #25  
Old 12-24-2019, 03:36 PM
Cee Jay's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Kaysville, Utah, US
Posts: 10,852
Received 5,431 Likes on 3,207 Posts
Default

I'm opposite that ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^.
Way I figure, if a car has low mileage it COULD be because it would never run right enough to be trusted on the road for more than a few miles. A goodly sum of miles but not outlandish would mean that it was a trusted vehicle that evidently hadn't let the owner stranded.
Plus, the 2012+ look newer.
 
The following 3 users liked this post by Cee Jay:
guy (01-04-2020), MarkyUK (12-26-2019), Sean W (01-04-2020)
  #26  
Old 12-24-2019, 04:02 PM
bocatrip's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,117
Received 529 Likes on 375 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chazaroo
I've had three XKs, not counting my current 2010 XKR. I guess I'm in the camp of finding the lowest mileage car you can afford. I'd rather have a 2010 with 20,000 miles than a 2014 with 50,000.
How about a 2010 XK with 10,800 miles? The main reason for the low miles, is I find that when I take the car out for a long drive every few months, it's like purchasing it for the first time. It's just so much fun! It also helped that it only had 4,500 miles when I purchased it 6 years ago. Still has the original tires, although the dealer replaced all the rotors under warranty and I changed out the OEM pads to ceramic. Car still smells new. No repairs either. Of course if you don't drive it, nothing breaks!
 
The following 2 users liked this post by bocatrip:
chazaroo (12-29-2019), Queen and Country (12-30-2019)
  #27  
Old 12-24-2019, 04:17 PM
Sean W's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 8,401
Received 4,256 Likes on 2,379 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bocatrip
How about a 2010 XK with 10,800 miles? The main reason for the low miles, is I find that when I take the car out for a long drive every few months, it's like purchasing it for the first time. It's just so much fun! It also helped that it only had 4,500 miles when I purchased it 6 years ago. Still has the original tires, although the dealer replaced all the rotors under warranty and I changed out the OEM pads to ceramic. Car still smells new. No repairs either. Of course if you don't drive it, nothing breaks!
Well if you're giving it away Bocatrip, let me be the first to offer to take it off your hands and prove you right!
 
  #28  
Old 12-24-2019, 05:21 PM
bocatrip's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,117
Received 529 Likes on 375 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sean W
Well if you're giving it away Bocatrip, let me be the first to offer to take it off your hands and prove you right!
I'll keep that in mind Sean!
 
The following users liked this post:
Sean W (12-24-2019)
  #29  
Old 12-24-2019, 08:16 PM
CleverName's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,453
Received 875 Likes on 633 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stuart S
Can't miss something that the factory never made.
The wood steering wheel was available only in 2007 and never with Rich Oak veneer, which was unique to the 2009 XKR Portfolio.
I knew it was an optional accessory for 07, but it remains readily available for purchase in walnut and poplar for all models up to 2015.
Was the wood shift knob optional, or did the rich oak just not come with it?

You have wood on the doors near the window controls on a first gen! I so want!.... My 2010 has that in walnut, but the 07 XK is silver plastic. IIRC the 2nd gen will not fit the 1st gen door. Not sure where I saw that, but you have given me hope!
 
  #30  
Old 12-24-2019, 09:45 PM
Stuart S's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Atlanta suburbs
Posts: 9,311
Received 6,320 Likes on 3,465 Posts
Default

The 2008 and 2009 Portfolio models came from the factory with a unique design polished aluminum and leather shift knob, regardless of the interior trim - either Rich Oak veneer or Spun Aluminum.

 
The following users liked this post:
CleverName (12-25-2019)
  #31  
Old 12-29-2019, 06:04 AM
barnsie's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Leicetershire, UK
Posts: 586
Received 464 Likes on 235 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cee Jay
I'm opposite that ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^.
Way I figure, if a car has low mileage it COULD be because it would never run right enough to be trusted on the road for more than a few miles. A goodly sum of miles but not outlandish would mean that it was a trusted vehicle that evidently hadn't let the owner stranded.
Plus, the 2012+ look newer.
Also, some parts deteriorate with age not mileage (eg bushes) so a low mileage car may still have upcoming issues. I don't think there is a hard and fast rule - condition is all that matters really, not the year or the mileage. Plus, for me, the absolutely critical factor is the service history. Not just stamps in the book, but invoices, documentation and so on.
 
  #32  
Old 12-29-2019, 06:24 AM
jagtoes's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: NY
Posts: 5,209
Received 1,839 Likes on 1,233 Posts
Default

Having gone through this decision process when considering what to buy ended up with me looking for the latest model which closely fit my budget. Mine was to go for a 2012 back in 2014 with low mileage. Now if I were looking in 2020 I would guess I would go for a 2015 with the lowest mileage I could find. Now if you have financial constraints it make the process harder as it will put you back into the 2010-2012 model's with 30-50K miles. That being the case then the service records start to play into the equation. Then again if you are a DIY'er you can look at some of the higher mileage cars. Whatever you do just buy one as it's an experience you'll cherish forever. Life is short.
 
The following 2 users liked this post by jagtoes:
jon-izumi (12-30-2019), MarkyUK (12-29-2019)
  #33  
Old 12-30-2019, 01:00 AM
1 of 19's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Eau Claire, WI.
Posts: 1,749
Received 735 Likes on 470 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sean W
Looks are way to subjective. I'm not a fan of the knob gear selector. I don't know why, I just don't like it on any car, not just the Jag. Enough so that I would steer clear of the newer models. Weird right?
Not weird at all, I keep waiting for someone to come up with a Hurst shifter stick on for these ridiculous rotary knobs. It would sell.
 
  #34  
Old 12-30-2019, 09:58 AM
Cee Jay's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Kaysville, Utah, US
Posts: 10,852
Received 5,431 Likes on 3,207 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1 of 19
...............I keep waiting for someone to come up with a Hurst shifter stick on for these ridiculous rotary knobs. It would sell.
HEY!!!
Ya know, when I first got mine I thought it a bit weird. NOW, however, I feel like the ridiculous stick-type shifter is antiquated and pedestrian. You know, gauche and uncool.
 
  #35  
Old 12-30-2019, 12:49 PM
Stuart S's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Atlanta suburbs
Posts: 9,311
Received 6,320 Likes on 3,465 Posts
Default

If you want REALLY ridiculous ... shown on a new XJ rotary shifter.


Compare to the tasteful mod on my XJ.



 
  #36  
Old 12-30-2019, 12:57 PM
shemp's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 1,492
Received 571 Likes on 386 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stuart S
If you want REALLY ridiculous ... shown on a new XJ rotary shifter.

That's just asking to be ripped off by a hand bag strap or a sleeve....
 
  #37  
Old 01-04-2020, 10:31 AM
guy's Avatar
guy
guy is offline
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,807
Received 1,123 Likes on 791 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GGG
Although the original 4.2 was right "out of the box" when introduced in 2006, the same was not true for the 5.0 litre. The original engine has proved less troublesome than the later one but that being said, we don't see many reports of serious issues on our forums.

More important than YEAR is the PO. Future reliability depends to a great extent on how well the vehicle has been maintained. Not just scheduled maintenance but keeping on top of the little things that go wrong. A Jaguar from a mechanically sympathetic and enthusiast owner is worth the search.

When I last changed, I specifically wanted the final model year to benefit from development and build specification. The one I have now is the eighth I looked at but maybe I'm too picky!

Graham
Thanks for the smile! Aren’t we all.
and a completely unbiased viewpoint: early model 2007, fully loaded. ;-)
 
  #38  
Old 01-04-2020, 10:33 AM
guy's Avatar
guy
guy is offline
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,807
Received 1,123 Likes on 791 Posts
Default

I sure hope I don’t know anyone with that!
Originally Posted by Stuart S
If you want REALLY ridiculous ... shown on a new XJ rotary shifter.


Compare to the tasteful mod on my XJ.
 
  #39  
Old 01-04-2020, 10:37 AM
guy's Avatar
guy
guy is offline
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,807
Received 1,123 Likes on 791 Posts
Default

:-). I enjoy driving mine so much I’ve done road trips to Maine for pleasure as well as Boston for Business. And I am constantly given compliments everywhere I go.

Originally Posted by barnsie
I don't know how typical I am, but I went for the 4.2 SC car, 2008 MY. I could have afforded to buy one of the earlier 5.0 SC cars (2010 on?) but I made my decision on the basis that the 4.2 engine had had years of development and so was maybe more reliable overall. I'd heard the word 'bulletproof' from more than one source. I have no idea if this is true or not but it was my thinking at the time. I accept that the 2008 4.2 XK-R is not as fast as the 2010 5,0 XK-R but it is plenty fast enough for me, so that didn't influence me too much. I do prefer the looks of the front end of the 5.0 models but I am happy enough with how mine looks in Lunar Gray with Ivory interior. If money was no object, I'd go for the very last model they made, hoping that by then, any problems had been ironed out in production. Not suggesting this as a course of action to anyone - just saying what my own thinking was, right or wrong.
 
  #40  
Old 01-08-2020, 09:51 AM
DGL's Avatar
DGL
DGL is offline
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,996
Received 933 Likes on 611 Posts
Default

IMO, the best year to buy is 2014-15 for the following reasons.
1. In 2014 the Dynamic R package came out which included a fully loaded XKR at an incredible price. It included dynamic pack, suede steering wheel, quilted performance seats, performance exhaust, black pack, speed pack, metal foot pedals, and vortex rims with over size Perrelli rubber. This package made the XKR equal to an XKR-S less the XKR-S body kit.
2. 2015 was the final year of this icon. A final fifty version is extremely rare.
3. You get a version of the car which has most of the bugs already dealt with and the latest options available.
4. Because I own one, lol.
 


Quick Reply: Best Year XKR to buy



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:54 AM.