XK / XKR ( X150 ) 2006 - 2014

Curious about LTFT -- current example

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 07-09-2024, 10:28 AM
panthera999's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 750
Received 596 Likes on 305 Posts
Default Curious about LTFT -- current example

Folks, I'm curious about my LTFT's sitting at -4 to -5% when at idle.
Note: 4.2 naturally aspirated. Denso sensors replaced last year.

See below.

Idle at around 600 rpm. Varies maybe 10 rpm in either direction.
LTFT's are indicating the ECU is adjusting 4-5% for rich on both banks. I know it's not much, but why isn't it 0%?
Because STFT's on both banks are operating correctly, adjusting around 0% more or less. Letting STFT's oscillate around 0% for awhile does not change LTFT.
(Note the graph captures instant data, so Bank 1 says 3% when that's lowest reading at that instant as the STFT cycle oscillates near 0%)
O2 sensors on both banks the same, correct at .6 - .7 volts.
MAF is correct at idle at around 7%....

So this is more curiosity than something being significantly wrong.

Question is, why doesn't LTFT drift to normal (0%), if STFT seems correct, and O2 sensors read correctly, and MAF reads correctly.
Air filter changed last year, so not clogged. Both banks doing the same, making a leaking injector unlikely.

So, if you have experience at how all these work together, what do you think is going on that makes the ECU adjust out a mildly rich condition on both banks?

Panthera


 

Last edited by panthera999; 07-09-2024 at 10:38 AM.
  #2  
Old 07-09-2024, 10:47 AM
JagV8's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Yorkshire, England
Posts: 26,776
Received 4,533 Likes on 3,942 Posts
Default

Imagine you cleared the trims (don't), it's likely your STFTs would then be -ve until the LTFTs gradually adjusted to where they are now.

STFTs near or at 0 (for a given engine LOAD/RPM/etc) means the LTFTs have learned (to whatever stable values).

Slightly -ve LTFTs and about the same both banks could be some common item slightly misreading e.g. MAF. If it's the MAF (and it may not be), a clean might help - but those are good LTFTs and I like to leave well alone!
 
  #3  
Old 07-09-2024, 11:49 AM
panthera999's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 750
Received 596 Likes on 305 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JagV8
Imagine you cleared the trims (don't), it's likely your STFTs would then be -ve until the LTFTs gradually adjusted to where they are now.

STFTs near or at 0 (for a given engine LOAD/RPM/etc) means the LTFTs have learned (to whatever stable values).

Slightly -ve LTFTs and about the same both banks could be some common item slightly misreading e.g. MAF. If it's the MAF (and it may not be), a clean might help - but those are good LTFTs and I like to leave well alone!
Thanks -- greatly appreciate your thoughts. I agree the current trims are good. It took some diagnostic work, since when I bought the car they were greater than +15 due to various vacuum leaks, etc. Got pretty good at smoke testing and patience.

Agreed, the STFT's tell the core tale, and they're fine. I'm mostly curious how the system works.

In particular, I'm just puzzled at why the LTFT's don't seem to shift. I always thought that LTFT was solely a calculated mathematical reflection of what the STFT's displayed -- LTFT as a smoothed curve of the STFT over time.

I think I'll try constant data capture at 1500 and 3000 for a minute each and see what STFT does. Maybe there's a very different STFT trim at higher RPM's. Again, thanks.
 
  #4  
Old 07-09-2024, 12:33 PM
ericmcn's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2024
Location: England
Posts: 13
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Dont get worked up too much about fuel trims - you need to understand that perfection is not possible in life, what is perfection? the magical air fuel ratio of 14.7 : 1 ... its not possible for any vehicle to maintain that which is why there is a large tolerance, I think the EML comes on if they go above 15 percent or somthing at which stage the ECU says sorry I cant do any more work here guys compensating for air fuel ratios lets call it a day.

+/- 4% is nothing, I think I seen the same in my 4.2 also a few months ago. If they were 10 percent yeah that is concerning, if the fuel trims are very positive or negative whilst driving that is obviously not desirable also.
The best way to assess the engine's health is capture the LTFT over a drive and average them out, I would guess that on a healthy engine the trims would be near pretty close to 0%
 
  #5  
Old 07-09-2024, 12:56 PM
trkyam's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 608
Received 196 Likes on 113 Posts
Default

I'd like to chime in that, if you changed your injectors at any point, the newer injectors (at least on the 5.0) flow more fuel
than the old injectors which will result in a negative 4 (-4) or so LTFT. This is normal unless you updated your ECU to reflect newer injectors.
 
  #6  
Old 07-09-2024, 12:57 PM
trkyam's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 608
Received 196 Likes on 113 Posts
Default

Also a clogged catalytic converter can also cause issues with fuel trim
 
  #7  
Old 07-09-2024, 01:02 PM
panthera999's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 750
Received 596 Likes on 305 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by trkyam
I'd like to chime in that, if you changed your injectors at any point, the newer injectors (at least on the 5.0) flow more fuel
than the old injectors which will result in a negative 4 (-4) or so LTFT. This is normal unless you updated your ECU to reflect newer injectors.
Good point -- but these are old-style 4.2 injectors, operate differently than the DI types in the 5.0.

Originally Posted by trkyam
Also a clogged catalytic converter can also cause issues with fuel trim
Interesting. Does one clogged affect both banks?
 
  #8  
Old 07-09-2024, 01:26 PM
panthera999's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 750
Received 596 Likes on 305 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ericmcn
Dont get worked up too much about fuel trims - you need to understand that perfection is not possible in life, what is perfection? the magical air fuel ratio of 14.7 : 1 ... its not possible for any vehicle to maintain that which is why there is a large tolerance, I think the EML comes on if they go above 15 percent or somthing at which stage the ECU says sorry I cant do any more work here guys compensating for air fuel ratios lets call it a day.

+/- 4% is nothing, I think I seen the same in my 4.2 also a few months ago. If they were 10 percent yeah that is concerning, if the fuel trims are very positive or negative whilst driving that is obviously not desirable also.
The best way to assess the engine's health is capture the LTFT over a drive and average them out, I would guess that on a healthy engine the trims would be near pretty close to 0%
I agree, it's certainly in tolerance and not a problem. This is a "how does it work" inquiry. I've learned a lot with this car, and I'm still curious.

Thanks, everyone. I'm going to collect more data. In the 4.2 NA, commonalities across both banks are: Air filter (new), MAF, throttle body, fuel pressure sensor (new), injector pulse timing, manifold pressure sensor, fuel temperature sensor. Time to get out SDD.
 
  #9  
Old 07-09-2024, 03:35 PM
JagV8's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Yorkshire, England
Posts: 26,776
Received 4,533 Likes on 3,942 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by panthera999
I'm just puzzled at why the LTFT's don't seem to shift.
They shouldn't "shift" (change). They should (and yours have) settle. Then the STFTs can adjust over their full range should they need to - such as a momentary thing that interferes with fuel/ignition/whatever.

The settled LTFTs are also what determine whether things are OK / codes flag.

Originally Posted by panthera999
I always thought that LTFT was solely a calculated mathematical reflection of what the STFT's displayed -- LTFT as a smoothed curve of the STFT over time.
They are. But the idea is to move the value (if steady, or the steady component of the value) into the LTFTs and zero the STFTs (well, zero is an ideal and engines tend not to be ideal).

Originally Posted by panthera999
I think I'll try constant data capture at 1500 and 3000 for a minute each and see what STFT does. Maybe there's a very different STFT trim at higher RPM's. Again, thanks.
A modern PCM tends to have a whole lot of LTFTs & STFTs, worked out for lots of combinations of engine load/RPM/etc. So you'll be looking at different ones (hopefully close to zero if you can do a steady speed - well, it's probably engine LOAD for your car but speed on a consistent road surface is a decent proxy for that).

You can think of a table of sets of LTFTs (& corresponding STFTs), where the cell in the table is chosen based on some combination of engine operating conditions (speed etc). Every time a particular cell is chosen its LTFTs & STFTs are used / updated. Then kept when another cell is chosen (due to slightly different operating parameters - you're going faster or whatever). Ideally each cell's LTFTs will settle (and be near zero).

The above data (about a cell, effectively) can be put into the Freeze Frame stuff if a DTC flags, and can help diagnose what went wrong - so you may get a Lean/Rich code for example plus RPM, LOAD and so on.

By way of example, lean codes often flag at idle but misfires might be uphill at 50 because that stresses the coils, and that data is in the freeze frame.
 

Last edited by JagV8; 07-09-2024 at 03:44 PM.
The following users liked this post:
panthera999 (07-10-2024)
  #10  
Old 07-09-2024, 03:50 PM
JagV8's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Yorkshire, England
Posts: 26,776
Received 4,533 Likes on 3,942 Posts
Default

It may help to think of LTFTs as a reflection of how close the engine is (over time) to an ideal newly made engine. The STFTs ideally fluctuate a bit around zero to cope with momentary disturbances (car jolts, fuel pump doesn't love that, or whatever).

But with (say) an air leak, the STFTs have to cope quite a bit and if they keep at similar non-zero values for a while then that value is in effect a way the engine is now behaving over time and goes into the LTFTs. The STFTs go back to zero (or near it), back to coping with momentary stuff.
 
The following users liked this post:
panthera999 (07-10-2024)
  #11  
Old 07-09-2024, 05:02 PM
McJag222's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 1,121
Received 573 Likes on 367 Posts
Default

Edit
 

Last edited by McJag222; 07-09-2024 at 07:51 PM. Reason: not relevant.
  #12  
Old 07-09-2024, 05:50 PM
jahummer's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 6,236
Received 2,378 Likes on 1,488 Posts
Default

Be more concerned about big differences between Bank 1 and Bank 2, they should both be the same, differences indicate on issue on the respective bank, (air or fuel - pumps, rails, injectors, intakes, vacuum, etc).
 
The following users liked this post:
panthera999 (07-10-2024)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
countyjag
XJ XJ6 / XJR6 ( X300 )
21
05-05-2020 12:12 PM
woox4
XJ XJ6 / XJ8 / XJR ( X350 & X358 )
4
06-01-2017 04:10 PM
harvest14
XJ XJ8 / XJR ( X308 )
9
02-18-2016 01:52 AM
ka1thm
XJ XJ8 / XJR ( X308 )
21
08-08-2011 04:57 AM
JWT
XJ XJ8 / XJR ( X308 )
10
05-31-2010 02:25 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: Curious about LTFT -- current example



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:41 PM.