If the XK/XKR is Discontinued-What are our cars worth?
The following users liked this post:
sharx8 (12-15-2013)
#42
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
DGL,
I don't agree with your assertion that in 20-25 years, all electric cars will be the standard. As a matter of fact, I believe electric cars will be an extremely short lived interim technology that will sooner rather than later give way to hydrogen based fuel celled cars. While electric cars surely save fuel, they are extremely dirty in both production and in disposal, and they still require the use of fossil fuels to generate electricity, and finally, their ranges are relatively short with long recharging times. (How do you take a long trip on an all electric car; it's why Tesla is rushing to create battery exchange stations in their high saturation areas). The reason for electric cars prominence, now, I believe, is that they don't require an infrastructure of stations all across the country which takes time and monetary commitment. With electrics, you just plug in to your own garage. The future will not be electric cars.
I don't agree with your assertion that in 20-25 years, all electric cars will be the standard. As a matter of fact, I believe electric cars will be an extremely short lived interim technology that will sooner rather than later give way to hydrogen based fuel celled cars. While electric cars surely save fuel, they are extremely dirty in both production and in disposal, and they still require the use of fossil fuels to generate electricity, and finally, their ranges are relatively short with long recharging times. (How do you take a long trip on an all electric car; it's why Tesla is rushing to create battery exchange stations in their high saturation areas). The reason for electric cars prominence, now, I believe, is that they don't require an infrastructure of stations all across the country which takes time and monetary commitment. With electrics, you just plug in to your own garage. The future will not be electric cars.
I'm not a mechanical engineer. Electric driven cars are certainly the next wave. How long they remain, I don't know. We all know petrol driven cars will be dinosaurs in 25 years. Future energy technologies will develop to replace petrol.
#43
#44
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
As for my XK8, similar experience. I added the arden kit, new paint color, totally custom interior, new wheels, and customized badging, and when I had tried to trade it before I did anything to it, I was offered 7850.00 (it had some issues) I just toyed with trading for a 98 DB7 and they offered me 16500.00. They said they've never seen a XK8 as nice as mine and without my modifications, the said theyed offer around 9000.00. Decided against the DB7 due to maintainance professionals locally or lack ther of!!
So my point is, at least in my experience, this stock thing is over rated. Unless we're talking a true, rare, limited classic. There's just too many jaguars out there since the XKE to really make them super car status. That being said, possibly some of the special editions stand a chance but as for the rest, not so sure.
#45
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Would it have been cheaper to just buy a 5.0L? Maybe. Was it a good investment? God no. Is it fun? Hell yes it's fun! And that was the point.
At the end of the day, it's just a car. Do what you want with it, drive it how you want to drive it and above all enjoy it, because it's only money and you can't take it with you.
It's like leaving the walls in your house beige because some day you might sell it and whoever looks at it might not like the color you chose. That's all true, but who wants to look at beige walls.
![Smile](https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/images/smilies/smile.gif)
![Icon Sultan](https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_sultan.gif)
#46
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
DGL,
I don't agree with your assertion that in 20-25 years, all electric cars will be the standard. As a matter of fact, I believe electric cars will be an extremely short lived interim technology that will sooner rather than later give way to hydrogen based fuel celled cars. While electric cars surely save fuel, they are extremely dirty in both production and in disposal, and they still require the use of fossil fuels to generate electricity, and finally, their ranges are relatively short with long recharging times. (How do you take a long trip on an all electric car; it's why Tesla is rushing to create battery exchange stations in their high saturation areas). The reason for electric cars prominence, now, I believe, is that they don't require an infrastructure of stations all across the country which takes time and monetary commitment. With electrics, you just plug in to your own garage. The future will not be electric cars.
I don't agree with your assertion that in 20-25 years, all electric cars will be the standard. As a matter of fact, I believe electric cars will be an extremely short lived interim technology that will sooner rather than later give way to hydrogen based fuel celled cars. While electric cars surely save fuel, they are extremely dirty in both production and in disposal, and they still require the use of fossil fuels to generate electricity, and finally, their ranges are relatively short with long recharging times. (How do you take a long trip on an all electric car; it's why Tesla is rushing to create battery exchange stations in their high saturation areas). The reason for electric cars prominence, now, I believe, is that they don't require an infrastructure of stations all across the country which takes time and monetary commitment. With electrics, you just plug in to your own garage. The future will not be electric cars.
About 80% of the electricity is still provided by burning fossil fuels. Having all those cars plugged in is only going to cause a significant increase in burning coal etc.
The following users liked this post:
tberg (12-14-2013)
#47
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Executive,
You are so right, but there is another issue looming that states like Washington, have tried to address. Electric cars don't pay gas taxes! So every other driver is subsidizing an electric vehicle's owner's ability to use the roads. The federal government also takes a big chunk of change out of every gallon of gasoline sold as this represents a large source of revenue (to both the states and the federal government). In California, well over $.40/gallon goes to taxes. You will see state after state as well as the feds pass legislation that adds very steep fees to the registration of electric vehicles to make up for the lost revenue. I believe Washington State has already done so or is considering it now.
Sorry to change the subject of the original thread.
You are so right, but there is another issue looming that states like Washington, have tried to address. Electric cars don't pay gas taxes! So every other driver is subsidizing an electric vehicle's owner's ability to use the roads. The federal government also takes a big chunk of change out of every gallon of gasoline sold as this represents a large source of revenue (to both the states and the federal government). In California, well over $.40/gallon goes to taxes. You will see state after state as well as the feds pass legislation that adds very steep fees to the registration of electric vehicles to make up for the lost revenue. I believe Washington State has already done so or is considering it now.
Sorry to change the subject of the original thread.
#48
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The question I have always had since acquiring a 2000 XKR Drophead was this. Was it an idiot at Ford or an idiot at Jaguar that approved the use of cheap fake Ford gauges, plastic engine parts like tensioners, waterpump, "sealed for life" transmission and a rear end it takes 4 hours to top off with no way to drain? $80K Are you kidding? What real car designer would have done these things. Has Tata continued the idiocy?
#50
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The question I have always had since acquiring a 2000 XKR Drophead was this. Was it an idiot at Ford or an idiot at Jaguar that approved the use of cheap fake Ford gauges, plastic engine parts like tensioners, waterpump, "sealed for life" transmission and a rear end it takes 4 hours to top off with no way to drain? $80K Are you kidding? What real car designer would have done these things. Has Tata continued the idiocy?
These cars most have come along way since your 2000 XKR. There is nothing cheap about my 2013 XKR. Without a doubt the best GT made at a fantastic price. A know a member in LA I met has had a long history of Jaguar's and has said repeatedly the current line up is so much better than the pre 2010's. I'd put my 2013 XKR against any BMW, Mercedes, or Audi GT out there. I also have a 2013 SLK 55 AMG and my 2013 XKR is so sweet.
#51
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The question I have always had since acquiring a 2000 XKR Drophead was this. Was it an idiot at Ford or an idiot at Jaguar that approved the use of cheap fake Ford gauges, plastic engine parts like tensioners, waterpump, "sealed for life" transmission and a rear end it takes 4 hours to top off with no way to drain? $80K Are you kidding? What real car designer would have done these things. Has Tata continued the idiocy?
Ford saved Jaguar. Simple as that. Without Ford pouring millions into the factories and FINALLY getting some quality control injected into Jaguar, and allowing them to jump light years into technology, they would likely have folded.
And the Current XF, XJ, XK were all designed while still under ford ownership. And the CX16 was also conceived in the last years of ford.
Tata has actually done for jaguar what ford started. It bought when jaguar was in limbo,(due to fords dinancial issues in the states) and pumped $$$$$ into it when it needed it.
The following users liked this post:
scm (12-21-2013)
#52
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Ford did put some reliability into Jaguars, but at the same time they held them back - as stated due to Ford's insufficient budget.
Tata has sank more money into Jaguar in the last 3-4 years than Ford did in 10. Which is why Jaguar has been on it's way to prominent future.
And, to address the quality issue every BMW and Merc was filled with plastic 13 years ago.
Tata has sank more money into Jaguar in the last 3-4 years than Ford did in 10. Which is why Jaguar has been on it's way to prominent future.
And, to address the quality issue every BMW and Merc was filled with plastic 13 years ago.
The following users liked this post:
scm (12-21-2013)
#53
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The big difference between Tata & Ford is integration.
Ford tried to improve economies of scale by merging elements of the companies it bought into its existing operations. That meant shared platforms (e.g. the S-Type/Lincoln floorpan), shared components and shared IT processes. While it reduced costs, it forced compromises on design & component quality - there is a tendency in theses circumstances to end up with the lowest common denominator.
Tata appears to have taken a different approach, treating Jaguar Land Rover as an investment into which it puts money and from which it receives profit. It hasn't tried to integrate JLR into its other operations or kill the goose that lays the golden eggs. I'm sure other parts of the Tata group are benefiting from JLR expertise, but Tata did not have an equivalent stable of existing products that could be shoehorned into JLR production.
Ford tried to improve economies of scale by merging elements of the companies it bought into its existing operations. That meant shared platforms (e.g. the S-Type/Lincoln floorpan), shared components and shared IT processes. While it reduced costs, it forced compromises on design & component quality - there is a tendency in theses circumstances to end up with the lowest common denominator.
Tata appears to have taken a different approach, treating Jaguar Land Rover as an investment into which it puts money and from which it receives profit. It hasn't tried to integrate JLR into its other operations or kill the goose that lays the golden eggs. I'm sure other parts of the Tata group are benefiting from JLR expertise, but Tata did not have an equivalent stable of existing products that could be shoehorned into JLR production.
The following users liked this post:
scm (12-21-2013)
#54
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Great responses from everyone and true. My problem is that at my age, I'm still a wood and leather guy who likes simple white on black gauges. Can't stand "carbon fiber" as trim or a car that looks like it should come with a feathered wide brim white hat. The new Jags are appealing to the Gen X and Millennial not me. I paid less than 8 grand for my 2000 XKR because I could not afford $50K-70K for an XKE. It spends it's time running around the country roads near Elkhart Lake, WI, out to Road America for races and into the village for evening dinner and a beer. If I upgraded it would be to an 05 4.2 litre car. Until then I'll do some work on tensioners, real gauge and put on about 1000 miles each summer.
By the way what does a 2013 Tata XKR cost?
By the way what does a 2013 Tata XKR cost?
#55
#56
#57
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
It spends it's time running around the country roads near Elkhart Lake, WI, out to Road America for races and into the village for evening dinner and a beer. If I upgraded it would be to an 05 4.2 litre car. Until then I'll do some work on tensioners, real gauge and put on about 1000 miles each summer.
Bruce
#58
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
>> Was it an idiot at Ford or an idiot at Jaguar that approved the use of cheap fake Ford gauges, plastic engine parts like tensioners, waterpump, "sealed for life" transmission and a rear end it takes 4 hours to top off with no way to drain? $80K Are you kidding? What real car designer would have done these things. Has Tata continued the idiocy?
My 2008 XKR still has a "sealed for life" tranny with a rear end with no drain plug. It didn't even come with a limited slip diff, which on a car like this is a very unforgiveable cheapskate saving. It has one now though :-) The use of soft clear plastic instead of proper glass on the headlights is also beyond retarded in a suspiciously planned way. After 40k miles of mostly city driving my headlights are already chipped and micro-pitted to hell and surprise surprise you can't just buy a new "glass" separately from Jag you have to buy a whole new headlight assembly to get it, which are around $2500 each.
Tata are apparently continuing down the cheap plastic road too. When I first saw an F-Type, the use of VERY cheap plastic in the interior, especially around the center console lid and rear cubby between the seats stood out immediately and A LOT to me as being totally inappropriate and unacceptable. I'm surprised, no, make that suspicious, that no review I've seen/read of the F-Type EVER mentions it, because it really is that obviously nasty and inappropriate especially for a car so expensive. Honestly my friends $15k Kia has much better quality plastic than the F-Type's rear center cubby especially.
Obviously cheap quality is a key reason I for one wouldn't ever buy an F-Type. I'd always be worried that if they would cheap out so much in highly visible places in the interior, then there must be some REALLY bad stuff going on under the covers where no one can see but it matters more.
Last edited by JustNiz; 12-17-2013 at 12:46 PM.
#59
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The use of soft clear plastic instead of proper glass on the headlights is also beyond retarded in a suspiciously planned way. After 40k miles of mostly city driving my headlights are already chipped and micro-pitted to hell and surprise surprise you can't just buy a new "glass" separately from Jag you have to buy a whole new headlight assembly to get it, which are around $2500 each.
I'm surprised, no, make that suspicious, that no review I've seen/read of the F-Type EVER mentions it, because it really is that obviously nasty and inappropriate especially for a car so expensive.
#60