XK / XKR ( X150 ) 2006 - 2014

Intake retrofit in progress for our XKR!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 10-26-2019, 05:58 PM
AlexJag's Avatar
Sponsor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,245
Received 418 Likes on 249 Posts
Default Intake retrofit in progress for our XKR!

This is what's in progress ,
If it all works out well the system will use factory air filter , while allowing up to 40% more air flow .so no compromise as far as filter efficiency.
stay tuned


 
__________________
2008 XKR Convertible, (mods: AlphaJagTuning ECU Tune , 1.5lb pulley, (200cel cats( are now melted), xpipe, Bosch 001 pump, 180 Thermostat.
Drag strip : 7.9sec 1/8mi 90 MPH . 1/4 mile 12.55 at 111.98mph
432rwh Dyno on Mustang Dynometer , Approx 511 crank HP.
2013 XJ 5.0 Supercharged, (stock with Alpha Jag ECU tune), estimated power: 600+ hp, 7.7sec 1.8th mi/95mph
  #2  
Old 10-27-2019, 03:00 PM
Thorsen's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,075
Received 1,552 Likes on 669 Posts
Default

Not trying to be funny, but is that the filter from a Shop Vac? Because that's almost exactly what the filter on my Shop Vac looks like.
 
The following 3 users liked this post by Thorsen:
kj07xk (10-27-2019), Panthro (11-06-2019), SinF (11-18-2019)
  #3  
Old 10-28-2019, 12:31 PM
AlexJag's Avatar
Sponsor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,245
Received 418 Likes on 249 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Thorsen
Not trying to be funny, but is that the filter from a Shop Vac? Because that's almost exactly what the filter on my Shop Vac looks like.
A filter is a filter they got plenty of car filters designed like that
 
__________________
2008 XKR Convertible, (mods: AlphaJagTuning ECU Tune , 1.5lb pulley, (200cel cats( are now melted), xpipe, Bosch 001 pump, 180 Thermostat.
Drag strip : 7.9sec 1/8mi 90 MPH . 1/4 mile 12.55 at 111.98mph
432rwh Dyno on Mustang Dynometer , Approx 511 crank HP.
2013 XJ 5.0 Supercharged, (stock with Alpha Jag ECU tune), estimated power: 600+ hp, 7.7sec 1.8th mi/95mph
  #4  
Old 10-28-2019, 05:27 PM
CleverName's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,453
Received 875 Likes on 633 Posts
Default

I'm always overly skeptical about home made solutions to problems that never existed.
When and how did you determine that we all had this problem?
 
The following users liked this post:
SinF (11-18-2019)
  #5  
Old 10-28-2019, 05:31 PM
JagV8's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Yorkshire, England
Posts: 26,782
Received 4,535 Likes on 3,944 Posts
Default

I can't see how it can allow 40% more air flow - please show actual measurements at WOT that are so much bigger.
 
  #6  
Old 10-28-2019, 07:34 PM
AlexJag's Avatar
Sponsor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,245
Received 418 Likes on 249 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JagV8
I can't see how it can allow 40% more air flow - please show actual measurements at WOT that are so much bigger.
They do flow more for sure. I can't however measure the exact difference. Going by manufacturer claims our single filter is rated at 300 cfm, vs the new filters rated for 500cfm each .
And comparing filtering area vs hp, our oem setup is on the low end for size compared to other vehicles.
 

Last edited by AlexJag; 10-28-2019 at 07:37 PM.
  #7  
Old 10-28-2019, 07:41 PM
AlexJag's Avatar
Sponsor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,245
Received 418 Likes on 249 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CleverName
I'm always overly skeptical about home made solutions to problems that never existed.
When and how did you determine that we all had this problem?
The same time that I figured out that 416 stock up wasn't enough and now nearly 100hp over that
 
  #8  
Old 10-28-2019, 11:41 PM
scottjh9's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: california
Posts: 1,749
Received 579 Likes on 434 Posts
Default

Is that going to affect your custom tune or will the ecm adapt....i am seriously looking at getting your tune for my 06 str after pulley is swapped out
 
The following users liked this post:
AlexJag (10-29-2019)
  #9  
Old 10-29-2019, 12:27 AM
AlexJag's Avatar
Sponsor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,245
Received 418 Likes on 249 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by scottjh9
Is that going to affect your custom tune or will the ecm adapt....i am seriously looking at getting your tune for my 06 str after pulley is swapped out
Well so far results are inconclusive, maf readings seem to be higher than before indicating higher flow , but still have to verify on the dyno. There are some parameters related to intake restriction in the ECU , I haven't touched them yet ..
 
__________________
2008 XKR Convertible, (mods: AlphaJagTuning ECU Tune , 1.5lb pulley, (200cel cats( are now melted), xpipe, Bosch 001 pump, 180 Thermostat.
Drag strip : 7.9sec 1/8mi 90 MPH . 1/4 mile 12.55 at 111.98mph
432rwh Dyno on Mustang Dynometer , Approx 511 crank HP.
2013 XJ 5.0 Supercharged, (stock with Alpha Jag ECU tune), estimated power: 600+ hp, 7.7sec 1.8th mi/95mph
  #10  
Old 10-29-2019, 09:33 AM
gkubrak's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: CT, USA
Posts: 991
Received 697 Likes on 351 Posts
Default

The filter itself may give higher flow, but the inlet area in the housing seems restrictive.

What about when you drive in the rain? Seems like they would easily get wet in that position.
 
  #11  
Old 10-29-2019, 12:02 PM
Queen and Country's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Hastings
Posts: 7,420
Received 2,383 Likes on 1,609 Posts
Default

The question you should have been looking at is not how much more air will one filter flow over the other.
You should be asking how much restriction is the air filter causing- the answer is nothing in all practicality.
Just pull the filter off, i.e 0% restriction, you car will not suck more air and not produce more power.

Air filters dont have the restriction you think they have.
 
The following users liked this post:
Ranchero50 (11-18-2019)
  #12  
Old 10-29-2019, 01:45 PM
Canadacat's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: KINGSVILLE, ONTARIO
Posts: 430
Received 154 Likes on 96 Posts
Default

I understand the thinking of this if there was not a supercharger involved but the supercharger negates any increase in air as it is already pumping as much as it can....no?
 
  #13  
Old 10-29-2019, 01:58 PM
AlexJag's Avatar
Sponsor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,245
Received 418 Likes on 249 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Canadacat
I understand the thinking of this if there was not a supercharger involved but the supercharger negates any increase in air as it is already pumping as much as it can....no?
Not exactly. Supercharger, simply put is an air pump. Any restriction in the intake side is a loss of potential boost .

Here is a good article http://kennebell.net/tech/supercharg...ncy-explained/
 

Last edited by AlexJag; 10-29-2019 at 02:03 PM.
  #14  
Old 11-01-2019, 05:01 PM
scottjh9's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: california
Posts: 1,749
Received 579 Likes on 434 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AlexJag
Not exactly. Supercharger, simply put is an air pump. Any restriction in the intake side is a loss of potential boost .

Here is a good article Supercharger Efficiency Explained | Kenne Bell
Very informative read ...easy to understand....now it makes sense why max hp on my str is closer to redine.... whereas max hp on my 6 liter n/a chevy is more in the middle as engine vacuum decreases after a certain point.....bottom line is, i wish i had a twinscrew
 
The following 2 users liked this post by scottjh9:
AlexJag (11-01-2019), Panthro (11-07-2019)
  #15  
Old 11-02-2019, 12:49 AM
AlexJag's Avatar
Sponsor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,245
Received 418 Likes on 249 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by scottjh9
Very informative read ...easy to understand....now it makes sense why max hp on my str is closer to redine.... whereas max hp on my 6 liter n/a chevy is more in the middle as engine vacuum decreases after a certain point.....bottom line is, i wish i had a twinscrew
Scott there is plenty of potential locked up in the 4.2 engines if you have seen my Dyno charts threads.
Regarding the intake, I have a sneaky suspicion that I was correct and our oem filters are undersized. So far I'm setting records for highest maf readings ever and numbers do make sense. Still working out the kinks of our system which is very sensitive to air flow difference of each side. luckily with help of SDD JLR I can monitor each MAF sensor and adjust air flow as needed by blocking or opening up to even out the flow on both banks..
 
__________________
2008 XKR Convertible, (mods: AlphaJagTuning ECU Tune , 1.5lb pulley, (200cel cats( are now melted), xpipe, Bosch 001 pump, 180 Thermostat.
Drag strip : 7.9sec 1/8mi 90 MPH . 1/4 mile 12.55 at 111.98mph
432rwh Dyno on Mustang Dynometer , Approx 511 crank HP.
2013 XJ 5.0 Supercharged, (stock with Alpha Jag ECU tune), estimated power: 600+ hp, 7.7sec 1.8th mi/95mph
  #16  
Old 11-02-2019, 01:05 AM
kj07xk's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Naperville, Illinois USA
Posts: 4,676
Received 2,012 Likes on 1,345 Posts
Default

Ok, so I’m talking out of my **** here, but if the car is sensitive to airflow difference between sides, and all that air, from both sides goes to the same place, wouldn’t life be easier (when making these types of mods), to just put both sensors on the same side? Then they’ll read the same.
 
  #17  
Old 11-02-2019, 11:15 AM
AlexJag's Avatar
Sponsor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,245
Received 418 Likes on 249 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kj07xk
Ok, so I’m talking out of my **** here, but if the car is sensitive to airflow difference between sides, and all that air, from both sides goes to the same place, wouldn’t life be easier (when making these types of mods), to just put both sensors on the same side? Then they’ll read the same.
Good idea but you're forgetting that the other side is going to be left open and unmonitored . It needs to calculate the total air by monitoring both openings, so if one sude flows more than the other but you have 2 maf on one side you might not get the correct reading
 
  #18  
Old 11-02-2019, 11:20 AM
scottjh9's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: california
Posts: 1,749
Received 579 Likes on 434 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AlexJag
Scott there is plenty of potential locked up in the 4.2 engines if you have seen my Dyno charts threads.
Regarding the intake, I have a sneaky suspicion that I was correct and our oem filters are undersized. So far I'm setting records for highest maf readings ever and numbers do make sense. Still working out the kinks of our system which is very sensitive to air flow difference of each side. luckily with help of SDD JLR I can monitor each MAF sensor and adjust air flow as needed by blocking or opening up to even out the flow on both banks..
you speak of 2 sides on your xkr...does that mean you have 2 intake tubes feeding your supercharger vs the 1 like I have on my str
 
  #19  
Old 11-02-2019, 02:14 PM
AlexJag's Avatar
Sponsor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,245
Received 418 Likes on 249 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by scottjh9
you speak of 2 sides on your xkr...does that mean you have 2 intake tubes feeding your supercharger vs the 1 like I have on my str
Correct , 2 intake tubes, 2 maf and 2 filters
 
  #20  
Old 11-02-2019, 02:53 PM
scottjh9's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: california
Posts: 1,749
Received 579 Likes on 434 Posts
Default

ok...I did not know that...never seen an xkr engine....you have more potential hp than me I would think with more potential airflow to increase fueling.....maybe that is why the same year xkr is rated 420 hp and my str 400 hp, if i am correct
 


Quick Reply: Intake retrofit in progress for our XKR!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:56 PM.