Just how good do you think a 2013 C-X16 would look parked next to the XKR?
#1
Just how good do you think a 2013 C-X16 would look parked next to the XKR?
I'll be viewing it next week at the Toronto Auto Show, and the Jag dealer told me it would be available late this year as a 2013. There's also a thread in this forum... https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/o...concept-62094/. Very trim and sporty, drop dead gorgeous, smaller and lower priced than XK, V6 and hybrid, concept to production...gotta like it!
Bruce
Bruce
Last edited by Bruce H.; 02-13-2012 at 05:02 PM.
#6
#7
Bruce
Trending Topics
#9
#11
#12
I saw somewhere that it'll be a few thousand less than the XK but I'm not sure anybody knows at this point. The dealer said they'd have the price in time for the show next week and I'll let you know. Also saw that an 8 cylinder version might be in the offering at a later time. I haven't compared measurements yet with the XKR, but the dealer did say it's a much smaller car, more in the Cayman range. The high sills make me think it could be a bit of a challenge to get in and out of...so it'll definitely be no good for delivering pizza! I just hope it isn't too small.
Porsche completely redesigns the 911 every few years and makes it look almost exactly the same...that's gotta be hard to do. Probably afraid to make it look much different for fear of an uproar from the 911 faithful...and they're probably right. Actually, come to think of it, Jaguar really isn't all that different now that I think of it!
Nice to see Jaguar take a big step out with this C-X16. Where the XK shape could not be mistaken for any other brand other than Jaguar, the C-X16 has a much more aggressive look that could be from one of several high-end manufacturers.
Bruce
Porsche completely redesigns the 911 every few years and makes it look almost exactly the same...that's gotta be hard to do. Probably afraid to make it look much different for fear of an uproar from the 911 faithful...and they're probably right. Actually, come to think of it, Jaguar really isn't all that different now that I think of it!
Nice to see Jaguar take a big step out with this C-X16. Where the XK shape could not be mistaken for any other brand other than Jaguar, the C-X16 has a much more aggressive look that could be from one of several high-end manufacturers.
Bruce
#13
Update:
The Jaguar sales associate called me last night to say he had viewed the C-X16 and spoken with Ian Callum at the show. The final decision whether to produce it or not is not expected to be made until mid-March, with no pricing until then. The car at the show (only one ever built) is a pre-production unit, and changes could still be made for production models, with the side-hinged rear hatch being an example. When asked if the dealer might have to return deposits they had already collected, Ian replied..."doubtful"!
I compared measurements with the XKR Coupe and found the C-X16 to be 14" shorter, 5" shorter wheel base, 3/4" narrower, 1" lower height, and 1600 kg vs 1753 kg (over 300 lbs lighter). It's also rated at 4.4 sec to 100 kph (62 mph) vs 4.8 sec.
A friend will be comparing it on Sunday with the 2015 NSX that he's already put a deposit on and will give me his feedback. I expect to see it myself on Wednesday and will report back with photos.
Bruce
The Jaguar sales associate called me last night to say he had viewed the C-X16 and spoken with Ian Callum at the show. The final decision whether to produce it or not is not expected to be made until mid-March, with no pricing until then. The car at the show (only one ever built) is a pre-production unit, and changes could still be made for production models, with the side-hinged rear hatch being an example. When asked if the dealer might have to return deposits they had already collected, Ian replied..."doubtful"!
I compared measurements with the XKR Coupe and found the C-X16 to be 14" shorter, 5" shorter wheel base, 3/4" narrower, 1" lower height, and 1600 kg vs 1753 kg (over 300 lbs lighter). It's also rated at 4.4 sec to 100 kph (62 mph) vs 4.8 sec.
A friend will be comparing it on Sunday with the 2015 NSX that he's already put a deposit on and will give me his feedback. I expect to see it myself on Wednesday and will report back with photos.
Bruce
#15
#16
Bruce
#17
#18
#19
Jaguar C X16 at Cdn Intl Auto Show Feb 2012 pictures by GT2860RS - Photobucket
"It was drop dead gorgeous. Actually the first car we saw as we walked into the show floor. I thought it was a Maserati at first. Very, very nice lines. A very pretty girl told him it was the only one in the world, and that the same prototype was traveling the world to all the shows. Kind of like the NSX concept, one of one. I am sticking with the NSX, and Jim was starting to think of putting a deposit on one as well.
"I really like it. Certainly the front end is great.... the doors back almost looks retro GT. The back is very understated. I bet it would look awesome on the road."
"Ah Bruce..... you're absolutely right... that was the best welcome to the show... the 16 in all her glory. It is not too small... just right actually. It is not as svelt or as lean as your CAT.... it is rather squared and upright as I recall. But gorgeous in looks and proportions just the same.... and 2-doors with a roof. And such a classy reception to tell us all about it!! Jaaag knows how to do it."
And here's the new NSX that they are taken with:
https://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx...280&parid=root
I'm intrigued with the NSX as well, and particularly like that it will be AWD and hybid, and it's sure to be light-weight and have a good power to weight ratio. It's also supposed to be somewhat affordable.
While I do like the sleek look of the NSX, I don't lust after it like the Jaaag. What do you guys think of this dynamic duo?
Bruce
#20
If we're talking aesthetics -- I don't see how there can be any contest. Personally, I don't care for Acura's design language at all. And the general populace seems to agree. There's only so much you can do for squinty, chevron inspired shapes. I went for the XK over others because of how drop dead shmexy the curves were. If we're buying things based on running gear, then the waters become a wee bit more murky -- but we don't know a lot about how either of those will translate into production.