XK / XKR ( X150 ) 2006 - 2014

Official> There Will Be No Jaguar XK Successor

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 03-26-2016, 08:41 AM
mosesbotbol's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Boston, USA
Posts: 6,278
Received 1,202 Likes on 933 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Wolfy
My pick would probably be the E-Class Cabriolet.
A buddy just bought an E550 Cabriolet and did a Renntech tune and exhaust on it. My Lord is it fast; too much so. He added Pilot Sports, but I do not feel so safe with that car drops the hammer. Beautiful car that is great with the top down. Good rear passenger room, nice size trunk. All well executed. One thing it did not need was an additional 150 hp that he added... Now he needs better brakes, lol...
 
  #22  
Old 03-26-2016, 08:46 AM
mosesbotbol's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Boston, USA
Posts: 6,278
Received 1,202 Likes on 933 Posts
Default

2+2 does not have to have a "real back seat". It can be the same as the XK's, which is fine for its intent. If you really need to have passengers back there; these cars are not that. They're great for what all use them for; not much else.

I do like have some kind of room behind the seat, even if it's just token space.
 
  #23  
Old 03-26-2016, 11:20 AM
Queen and Country's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Hastings
Posts: 7,420
Received 2,383 Likes on 1,609 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ferraripete
this! cannot be better stated.
I bought a XK to get away from the bus driver feeling every other car gave me, especial the Germans, and I did not want to pretend to be a boy driving a boxer or vette.
 
  #24  
Old 03-26-2016, 11:22 AM
Queen and Country's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Hastings
Posts: 7,420
Received 2,383 Likes on 1,609 Posts
Default

I already feel like I got a 3 in 1: real luxury, sports, and comfort.
 
  #25  
Old 03-28-2016, 12:14 PM
Tervuren's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Carolinas
Posts: 2,181
Received 654 Likes on 478 Posts
Default

I like the *almost* unusable back seats, great easy access cargo area, and *can* be used for extra passengers in need, yet, you won't be asked for the extra passengers unless it really is needed. Perfect.

As soon as I noticed the lack of them in the F-type, I stopped looking. The 911 or DB9 would be the remaining choices on the market, but both are a much higher $$$ car than the XK was. (If you wanted to select the options to get a 911 to similar standards as the XK, its about $25K on top of base).

No new Xk will help stabilize depreciation as there will be no new Jaguar model to displace it, but I doubt it will appreciate beyond what it costs to keep a driving one running over the next 30 years.

I'm 6' 2", and found the back seats of the XK quite a bit more comfortable than the 944's. I've never had to carry more than 2 in the XK yet, but there have been times over the years with the 944 where its been quite handy to able to accommodate young ladies in need.
 

Last edited by Tervuren; 03-28-2016 at 01:05 PM.
  #26  
Old 03-28-2016, 02:55 PM
mosesbotbol's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Boston, USA
Posts: 6,278
Received 1,202 Likes on 933 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tervuren
As soon as I noticed the lack of them in the F-type, I stopped looking. The 911 or DB9 would be the remaining choices on the market, but both are a much higher $$$ car than the XK was. (If you wanted to select the options to get a 911 to similar standards as the XK, its about $25K on top of base).
How about the Lotus Evora or Evora 400?
 
  #27  
Old 03-28-2016, 07:06 PM
sharx8's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Horseshoe Valley, Ont, Canada
Posts: 440
Received 88 Likes on 57 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by steve_k_xk
If aston Martin do it with the vantage and DB9 why can't jaguar
Porsche do it with their 911 and Cayman

Both these brands are highly respectable and I do not see credibility being lost at all

The reason I have the 2+2 is so my wife and two little children can enjoy the Jaguar experience with me on the open road
I agree 100%

I could not have purchased the F type due to the lack of rear seats for my 2 under 10 year olds. Non starter. The XK was the very best option for me when I compared to all the others. Way better looking than similarly priced alternatives and financially attainable vs Maserati or Aston Martin. And that glorious Supercharged V8 sound! The 2 plus 2 format is still needed at Jag in my opinion.
 
  #28  
Old 03-29-2016, 11:35 AM
apost8n8's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: gulf breeze, fl
Posts: 200
Received 55 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

At first I was disappointed that the Ftype was a 2seater and that the xk was over but it obviously keeps the price and nitch there for the xk for many years to come. Eventually jag will make a new GT but it doesnt have to be in the next decade. Also a 2+2 could use an extra inch or 2 without getting too big.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ABALaw
XF and XFR ( X250 )
33
04-14-2023 07:37 PM
KayScotts
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
4
03-10-2016 01:48 AM
jaggernought
S-Type / S type R Supercharged V8 ( X200 )
0
03-04-2016 01:40 PM
Jaguar Forums Editor
Jaguar Press release
0
02-26-2016 07:28 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: Official> There Will Be No Jaguar XK Successor



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:08 PM.