XK / XKR ( X150 ) 2006 - 2014

Rolling diameter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 05-28-2016, 11:03 PM
steve_k_xk's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 2,907
Received 1,548 Likes on 895 Posts
Default Rolling diameter

For those tech savvy folk out there

So the xk cones fitted with 3.31 diff ratio and 285-30-20 rears

Now the questions is if I fit up 295-25-20 tyres on the rear the rolling diameter will be reduced from 26.73" to 25.81" will this improve my acceleration as technically I have now shorten my final Ratio
 
  #2  
Old 05-28-2016, 11:22 PM
Cee Jay's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Kaysville, Utah, US
Posts: 10,784
Received 5,360 Likes on 3,174 Posts
Default

Out-the hole acceleration will be quicker, with upshifts occurring at the same engine RPM, which will again help the acceleration.
Thing is, 3.56% isn't a whole heck of a lot of a difference. While it would be measurable with the right equipment, the actual performance won't change much.
If you go with an even smaller diameter tire it would make a larger difference, but how small can it get with wheels big enough to fit the brakes and also have a small tire fit that smaller wheel, all while keeping the car from scraping the ground...
It would basically make your 3.31:1 into a3.42:1 with no differential mechanical work.
Not much change there.
 
  #3  
Old 05-28-2016, 11:42 PM
steve_k_xk's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 2,907
Received 1,548 Likes on 895 Posts
Default

Thanks Cee jay I think I'll pull the trigger and get the 295 25 20 any performance is beneficially on a n/a 4.2 !!
 
  #4  
Old 05-28-2016, 11:58 PM
Cee Jay's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Kaysville, Utah, US
Posts: 10,784
Received 5,360 Likes on 3,174 Posts
Default

I forgot to figure in PI, but the ratio would be the same as pi-over-pi is still one.
Hope you get what you need from the purchase.
 
  #5  
Old 05-29-2016, 01:41 AM
steve_k_xk's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 2,907
Received 1,548 Likes on 895 Posts
Default

Thanks Cee Jay

Yes anything to make that glorious n/a 4.2 pull that little bit faster is the goal
 
  #6  
Old 05-29-2016, 02:16 AM
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 8,638
Received 4,454 Likes on 2,426 Posts
Default

Seriously I would not bother with this, there are better ways to gain a couple of % improvement.

If you're looking at wheels/tyres then you will get a more noticeable benefit from switching to 18" wheels.
 
  #7  
Old 05-29-2016, 02:58 AM
steve_k_xk's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 2,907
Received 1,548 Likes on 895 Posts
Default

I'm In need of rear tyres and was thinking that I could kill two birds with the one stone
 
  #8  
Old 05-30-2016, 10:07 AM
bigdhenderson's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: CC IOWA
Posts: 505
Received 103 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

I'd bet you'd lose acceleration, due to less traction.
 
  #9  
Old 05-30-2016, 11:33 AM
jagtoes's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: NY
Posts: 5,209
Received 1,839 Likes on 1,233 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by steve_k_xk
For those tech savvy folk out there

So the xk cones fitted with 3.31 diff ratio and 285-30-20 rears

Now the questions is if I fit up 295-25-20 tyres on the rear the rolling diameter will be reduced from 26.73" to 25.81" will this improve my acceleration as technically I have now shorten my final Ratio
The short answer is no. It will only affect your speedometer which will run faster because of the smaller diameter. Tirerack has a chart that will tell you your speedometer error. The higher the rear gears the quicker off the line or different gears in the transmission for better low end and last more torque will do the trick.
 
  #10  
Old 05-30-2016, 12:46 PM
Leeper's Avatar
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 789
Received 238 Likes on 180 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jagtoes
The short answer is no. It will only affect your speedometer which will run faster because of the smaller diameter. Tirerack has a chart that will tell you your speedometer error. The higher the rear gears the quicker off the line or different gears in the transmission for better low end and last more torque will do the trick.
Another thing to look into is when changing the diameter dime card then have issues with both the ABS and traction control now that the rear tire still be spinning at a different rato than the fronts... not sure if Jags will encounter that but other cars sometimes do
 
  #11  
Old 05-30-2016, 12:59 PM
Leeper's Avatar
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 789
Received 238 Likes on 180 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jagtoes
The short answer is no. It will only affect your speedometer which will run faster because of the smaller diameter. Tirerack has a chart that will tell you your speedometer error. The higher the rear gears the quicker off the line or different gears in the transmission for better low end and last more torque will do the trick.
Another thing to look into is when changing the diameter some cars have issues with both the ABS and traction control now that the rear tire still be spinning at a different rato than the fronts... not sure if Jags will encounter that but other cars sometimes do
 
  #12  
Old 05-30-2016, 05:31 PM
Cee Jay's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Kaysville, Utah, US
Posts: 10,784
Received 5,360 Likes on 3,174 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jagtoes
The short answer is no...............
The short answer is actually "Barely".
Plus, all the speedo and ABS stuff.
 
  #13  
Old 05-31-2016, 04:25 AM
steve_k_xk's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 2,907
Received 1,548 Likes on 895 Posts
Default

Big Henderson
Bald 285 vs new 295 I don't think traction will be compromised !
 

Last edited by steve_k_xk; 05-31-2016 at 05:07 AM.
  #14  
Old 05-31-2016, 02:14 PM
White Bear's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Minnesotsa/Arizona
Posts: 431
Received 159 Likes on 113 Posts
Default

Remember, on a dry road best traction is from a slic, traction from a tread comes only in adverse conditions.
Regards,
 
  #15  
Old 06-01-2016, 09:43 AM
bigdhenderson's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: CC IOWA
Posts: 505
Received 103 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by steve_k_xk
Big Henderson
Bald 285 vs new 295 I don't think traction will be compromised !
Less sidewall isn't it?
 
  #16  
Old 06-03-2016, 07:46 AM
steve_k_xk's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 2,907
Received 1,548 Likes on 895 Posts
Default

That's correct the side wall profile goes from a 30 to a 25 however the tread width goes from 285mm to 295mm
 
  #17  
Old 06-03-2016, 09:17 PM
Cee Jay's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Kaysville, Utah, US
Posts: 10,784
Received 5,360 Likes on 3,174 Posts
Default

85.5mm sidewall to a 73.75 sidewall.
 
  #18  
Old 06-04-2016, 09:18 PM
bigdhenderson's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: CC IOWA
Posts: 505
Received 103 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cee Jay
85.5mm sidewall to a 73.75 sidewall.
Right, this is what I was saying. Sidewall height has a lot to do with traction
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JessN16
XJS ( X27 )
10
05-07-2016 01:47 AM
tomas6791
XF and XFR ( X250 )
0
05-03-2016 01:35 PM
wutitis101
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
0
05-03-2016 10:29 AM
worrasf
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
5
05-02-2016 09:30 AM
Doug Dooren
XJ XJ8 / XJR ( X308 )
3
05-01-2016 12:20 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: Rolling diameter



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:49 AM.