XK / XKR ( X150 ) 2006 - 2014

Warranty is done....Time to tune!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #61  
Old 03-20-2016 | 01:22 AM
Cambo's Avatar
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 8,638
Likes: 4,467
From: Sydney, Australia
Default

Originally Posted by Queen and Country
I live in the northern hemisphere. You just did not read what question I was answering- you answered the same thing - dont make your pipes bigger. However I added much needed info that increasing the size of the pipe can make you lose horsepower, especially on your car.
What does where you live have to do with this discussion?
 
  #62  
Old 03-20-2016 | 08:03 AM
bigdhenderson's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 505
Likes: 103
From: CC IOWA
Default

Originally Posted by Queen and Country
Increasing the diameter of the exhaust is bad. These are not engineers nor do they have the facilities to test their theories, you need way more than a dyno.

Imagine trying to blow through a 2inch straw, you wont get any velocity right. Now try blowing through a 1/4inch straw, you could shoot a pea across the room. This velocity and back pressure is important for an engine, the air flowing through it at a high velocity creates a vacuum behind itself, so it helps scavenge air from the next cylinder that is trying to expel air. i.e you gain HP by having the perfectly balanced exhaust. Several shadetree engineers remove the entire exhaust system only to find they lost power big time.

Besides putting a larger pipe behind a smaller pipe does f all to increase airflow. However it will help sound get deeper, is that what they were aiming for?

This is laughable....some of that may be true for a naturally aspirated engine, but not for forced induction.
 
The following users liked this post:
bklynchris (03-20-2016)
  #63  
Old 03-20-2016 | 10:25 AM
Queen and Country's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 7,420
Likes: 2,385
From: Hastings
Default

Originally Posted by bigdhenderson
This is laughable....some of that may be true for a naturally aspirated engine, but not for forced induction.
Laugh I dont mind, but dont forget to thank me when I actually help you gain power. You are the guy that removed the resonators from an intake to gain power. I showed you how that REDUCES power. Only because you still had the original intake. Otherwise I would not have rained on your parade. Same with this gentleman, he has a choice to go with the 2.25 or 2.5. As others pointed out its the choice the XKRS made.

Here is a brilliant article that explains what I said. Including forced induction!! Exhaust Pipes: Is Bigger Better? | outbackjoe
 
The following users liked this post:
bklynchris (03-20-2016)
  #64  
Old 03-20-2016 | 10:38 AM
jahummer's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,266
Likes: 2,390
From: Florida
Default

Originally Posted by bklynchris
So I plan on getting the tune/pulley done on Monday as planned, then getting the 2.25 in pipes put back on...on Tuesday...Do you agree that I should be ok doing it that way? I'm going to drive to LA which is approximately 400 miles in 1 direction, so for the whole trip, I could put 900 miles + on the car still with the larger (2.5in) pipes installed.
Depends if you are doing a live dyno tune. If they are just loading a tune file, then it won't matter, but if a live tune on a dyno I would think the performance difference between the 2 exhaust systems would come into play.
 
The following users liked this post:
bklynchris (03-20-2016)
  #65  
Old 03-20-2016 | 10:58 AM
Queen and Country's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 7,420
Likes: 2,385
From: Hastings
Default

look I really understand that some folks want to change something just to be unique, no matter what. I get that and respect it.

As a Jaguar engineering fanatic, I merely point out the scientific counter-argument, for the other conservatives who maybe questioning if Jaguar indeed did the right thing.
 
The following users liked this post:
bklynchris (03-20-2016)
  #66  
Old 03-20-2016 | 02:32 PM
bklynchris's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Veteran Member
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 54
From: AZ
Default

Originally Posted by Queen and Country
Laugh I dont mind, but dont forget to thank me when I actually help you gain power. You are the guy that removed the resonators from an intake to gain power. I showed you how that REDUCES power. Only because you still had the original intake. Otherwise I would not have rained on your parade. Same with this gentleman, he has a choice to go with the 2.25 or 2.5. As others pointed out its the choice the XKRS made.

Here is a brilliant article that explains what I said. Including forced induction!! Exhaust Pipes: Is Bigger Better? | outbackjoe
I've read the article and it makes perfect sense. I feel a reduction of power at low RPM's, but it does seem faster when I'm gunning it a little. I'll have the 2.5 pipes removed on Tuesday and re-install the 2.25 in pipes. Thanks.
 
  #67  
Old 03-20-2016 | 02:35 PM
bklynchris's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Veteran Member
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 54
From: AZ
Default

Originally Posted by jahummer
Depends if you are doing a live dyno tune. If they are just loading a tune file, then it won't matter, but if a live tune on a dyno I would think the performance difference between the 2 exhaust systems would come into play.

I'm going to ETG. I'm pretty sure they're just going to do a tune file and upgrade the pulley. I'll tell them what I did and see what they say. I really, really wish I had checked in with you guys first. Thanks.
 
  #68  
Old 03-20-2016 | 02:47 PM
Queen and Country's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 7,420
Likes: 2,385
From: Hastings
Default

Originally Posted by bklynchris
I've read the article and it makes perfect sense. I feel a reduction of power at low RPM's, but it does seem faster when I'm gunning it a little. I'll have the 2.5 pipes removed on Tuesday and re-install the 2.25 in pipes. Thanks.
I appreciate your candor and giving science a change.
Just know that Jaguar engineers do have some education, at the very least they do know how to give you the best of all worlds. You can do better but only by giving something else up.

The resonators on the intake for example- look at their decision process. They gave you a well tuned intake pipe that gives you more power than any other type of pipe you can have- guaranteed! But a tuned intake means lower intake sound, so for those who still want the superficiality of sound they did that whole fake sound thingy.
 
The following users liked this post:
bklynchris (03-20-2016)
  #69  
Old 03-25-2016 | 09:20 AM
bigdhenderson's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 505
Likes: 103
From: CC IOWA
Default

Originally Posted by Queen and Country
Laugh I dont mind, but dont forget to thank me when I actually help you gain power. You are the guy that removed the resonators from an intake to gain power. I showed you how that REDUCES power. Only because you still had the original intake. Otherwise I would not have rained on your parade. Same with this gentleman, he has a choice to go with the 2.25 or 2.5. As others pointed out its the choice the XKRS made.

Here is a brilliant article that explains what I said. Including forced induction!! Exhaust Pipes: Is Bigger Better? | outbackjoe
You haven't shown me anything (for my exact application), I'm attempting to show myself by doing something. If it is detrimental to performance, then it will go back to the stock intake. And as far as the exhaust goes, hell, if velocity is what we need let's all change our exhausts to 1.5"...that ought to give us a lot more velocity!
 
The following users liked this post:
Cee Jay (03-28-2016)
  #70  
Old 03-25-2016 | 10:30 AM
Queen and Country's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 7,420
Likes: 2,385
From: Hastings
Default

Originally Posted by bigdhenderson
You haven't shown me anything (for my exact application), I'm attempting to show myself by doing something. If it is detrimental to performance, then it will go back to the stock intake. And as far as the exhaust goes, hell, if velocity is what we need let's all change our exhausts to 1.5"...that ought to give us a lot more velocity!
No bro, first of all I am on your side and just helping. You cant just have velocity, you need volume (CFM) too. Its a very careful dance between the two. You have to get perfect balance to NOT lose performance.

Here is the GREAT NEWS this extremely complex calculation, which diyers and small shops cant do- has been done for us. I dont think many people realize how much R&D is done at multi-million dollar facilities to derive the correct balance. And even then there are compromises.

Here is the thing to get your arms around- an engine is basically an air pump, the volume of the pump (displacement) is what both ends have to be carefully matched to. Where it becomes rocket science is the pump and air change characteristics on the bottom-end vs top-end. If you change the volume or velocity on one end, you negatively affect the other.

If you want performance gains you have to go in the other direction, put larger/better resonators on the intake, not take them away.
 
  #71  
Old 04-01-2016 | 08:31 PM
bklynchris's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Veteran Member
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 54
From: AZ
Default

Hi forum,
sorry for the delay in chiming in. as fate would have it, I get my Jag tuned then get slammed at work and can't enjoy it. Anyway, met with Jags from ETG. Very knowledgeable guy and passionate about tuning with I appreciate. I was in and out in about 2 hours. While driving up to LA, I noticed my car starting to shake and I knew it had to be a motor mount. I was going to let the shop where Jags did my tune replace it for me, but it was getting late in the day so I nursed it back home. Missed my app't at the dealers to get it replaced, work, work, work, so I'm looking at next Wednesday before that's repaired. Then I'll go to my favorite patch of road and give her a try. Then off to the track!!....Eventhough I'm babying her, I believe I do feel a difference....could be wishful thinking though.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hugh ness
XJ XJ6 / XJR6 ( X300 )
8
02-27-2016 02:49 AM
Eurobahn Jaguar
XF and XFR ( X250 )
14
02-11-2016 04:37 PM
MrBW
XF and XFR ( X250 )
12
02-11-2016 08:40 AM
kstevusa
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
5
02-10-2016 12:35 PM
mastereagle88
X-Type ( X400 )
3
02-02-2016 01:17 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: Warranty is done....Time to tune!!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:41 AM.