What do we think about THIS car?
#1
What do we think about THIS car?
I know it's not an X150 but please don't move this thread - I've come to respect the advice of this group. I'm gonna be in Western MA for a while and this popped up. Thoughts??? (Like, "this is just a bad idea...")
https://westernmass.craigslist.org/c...869035258.html
https://westernmass.craigslist.org/c...869035258.html
Last edited by pk4144; 04-23-2019 at 12:49 AM.
#3
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Naperville, Illinois USA
Posts: 4,649
Received 1,975 Likes
on
1,326 Posts
The following users liked this post:
pk4144 (04-23-2019)
#5
I personally like how these look, but anecdotally these are extremely unreliable and difficult to work on. Also, it is penultimate old man's car.
If these two points don't bother you, go for it. Looks like a very clean example with low miles. My guess that you can haggle on price, as there isn't much demand for these and asking price is high.
If these two points don't bother you, go for it. Looks like a very clean example with low miles. My guess that you can haggle on price, as there isn't much demand for these and asking price is high.
The following users liked this post:
pk4144 (04-23-2019)
#7
I like the overall condition but I would immediately rip those Mercedes V12 badges off, and I REALLY don't like chrome wheel arch trim, but it's not as bad on a car that color. It's a nice comfy cruiser that has a reputation for being a little hard to keep running at top trim, but can definitely be ran with prompt, careful DIY.
The following users liked this post:
pk4144 (04-23-2019)
Trending Topics
The following users liked this post:
pk4144 (04-23-2019)
#9
Plus it's that retro feel that one loves about such cars. It is like going back in time when you drive them.
Last edited by AJ16er; 04-23-2019 at 09:20 AM.
The following users liked this post:
pk4144 (04-23-2019)
#10
#12
pk4144,
Markets vary, and you're from LA - the epicenter of caraholics. What's it worth in LA? There's probably not much of a market in western Massachusetts and if the seller's hungry, you might be able to snag a bargain that you could turn a quick profit on back home. Unfortunately, it's a coupe; convertibles sell better in sunny California.
It's not my cup of tea, but tastes vary. I doubt that you'd have as much pleasure driving it as your XKR with the top down.
Stuart
Markets vary, and you're from LA - the epicenter of caraholics. What's it worth in LA? There's probably not much of a market in western Massachusetts and if the seller's hungry, you might be able to snag a bargain that you could turn a quick profit on back home. Unfortunately, it's a coupe; convertibles sell better in sunny California.
It's not my cup of tea, but tastes vary. I doubt that you'd have as much pleasure driving it as your XKR with the top down.
Stuart
The following users liked this post:
pk4144 (04-23-2019)
#13
When the XJS came out, I didn't like them at all. Way too big, heavy and comparatively slow with less than great chuckability. But over the years they seem to have aged quite gracefully and now seem a nice example of "sort off 80s" automobile history (OK, 1975-1996 in reality). With US fuel prices, it would be a nice Sunday toy.
The chrome arches were not standard in Europe. I would want to know if they are now hiding anything red-brown coloured!
The chrome arches were not standard in Europe. I would want to know if they are now hiding anything red-brown coloured!
#15
Finally, I didn't realize they made this model in a 'vert -- MUCH more attractive car, my opinion.
Look for my photos in a week. I'll keep you posted.
FYI: driving the XKR across the country again, so it'll be in MA all summer!
#17
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,777
Received 1,103 Likes
on
776 Posts
Interesting responses.
Granted, there is much to review on the health of the car but;
I have ALWAYS liked the XJS for what it is. And that engine (when properly maintained) is just a beaut.
What a perfect way to head to the golf course... or Sunday brunch... or a concours event.
Its not the purchase price of these beauties that is problematic. It is the need for continual nit-picking maintenance. And the costs associated with that.
Should she pass all the checkboxes are YOU up the the continual maintenance checkbox??
I also appreciate you letting us chime with our opinions... but I wonder why. The XJS and XK (let alone the XXR) are miles apart in behaviour and demeanour.
(Just like these continual comparisons with Corvettes, Mustangs and anything else with wheels.)
Granted, there is much to review on the health of the car but;
I have ALWAYS liked the XJS for what it is. And that engine (when properly maintained) is just a beaut.
What a perfect way to head to the golf course... or Sunday brunch... or a concours event.
Its not the purchase price of these beauties that is problematic. It is the need for continual nit-picking maintenance. And the costs associated with that.
Should she pass all the checkboxes are YOU up the the continual maintenance checkbox??
I also appreciate you letting us chime with our opinions... but I wonder why. The XJS and XK (let alone the XXR) are miles apart in behaviour and demeanour.
(Just like these continual comparisons with Corvettes, Mustangs and anything else with wheels.)
#18
[QUOTE=SinF;2059421]I personally like how these look, but anecdotally these are extremely unreliable and difficult to work on. Also, it is penultimate old man's car.
.[/QUOTE
Well, NOT anecdotally but from my experience of owning many V12 Jaguars, I can say that the idea that they are unreliable is simply untrue. They are not difficult to work on, but if work is required it is more labour-intensive than work on a 6 or 8 cylinder car simply because of space restrictions. The good news is that the Jaguar V12 is a superb engine and very long-lived. Why it would be considered the second-to-last ("penultimate") old man's car, I have no idea.
This version of the V12 uses a Marelli ignition system, not Lucas, so Lucas jokes are not in order. The Lucas system was, in fact, very reliable...the Marelli, however has one weak point: the ignition rotor which has a two-step shape, one for each bank of the V. The rotors frequently fail and in that case fuel continues to be provided to both banks of the engine while spark goes to only one. The result is that while the engine runs on 6 cylinders, raw fuel is flowing into the catalytic converter from the other bank. The result of that is not good. The good news? Replacement of the rotor fixes the issue instantly. A spare rotor should be carried in the car.
The chrome wheel-arch covers are not original and they marr the appearance of the car; and as has been mentioned, the headlamps (and the leather) need refreshment. Easily done.
.[/QUOTE
Well, NOT anecdotally but from my experience of owning many V12 Jaguars, I can say that the idea that they are unreliable is simply untrue. They are not difficult to work on, but if work is required it is more labour-intensive than work on a 6 or 8 cylinder car simply because of space restrictions. The good news is that the Jaguar V12 is a superb engine and very long-lived. Why it would be considered the second-to-last ("penultimate") old man's car, I have no idea.
This version of the V12 uses a Marelli ignition system, not Lucas, so Lucas jokes are not in order. The Lucas system was, in fact, very reliable...the Marelli, however has one weak point: the ignition rotor which has a two-step shape, one for each bank of the V. The rotors frequently fail and in that case fuel continues to be provided to both banks of the engine while spark goes to only one. The result is that while the engine runs on 6 cylinders, raw fuel is flowing into the catalytic converter from the other bank. The result of that is not good. The good news? Replacement of the rotor fixes the issue instantly. A spare rotor should be carried in the car.
The chrome wheel-arch covers are not original and they marr the appearance of the car; and as has been mentioned, the headlamps (and the leather) need refreshment. Easily done.
The following users liked this post:
guy (04-23-2019)
#19
I like the overall condition but I would immediately rip those Mercedes V12 badges off, and I REALLY don't like chrome wheel arch trim, but it's not as bad on a car that color. It's a nice comfy cruiser that has a reputation for being a little hard to keep running at top trim, but can definitely be ran with prompt, careful DIY.
#20
[QUOTE=SinF;2059421]I personally like how these look, but anecdotally these are extremely unreliable and difficult to work on. Also, it is penultimate old man's car.
.[/QUOTE
Well, NOT anecdotally but from my experience of owning many V12 Jaguars, I can say that the idea that they are unreliable is simply untrue. They are not difficult to work on, but if work is required it is more labour-intensive than work on a 6 or 8 cylinder car simply because of space restrictions. The good news is that the Jaguar V12 is a superb engine and very long-lived. Why it would be considered the second-to-last ("penultimate") old man's car, I have no idea.
This version of the V12 uses a Marelli ignition system, not Lucas, so Lucas jokes are not in order. The Lucas system was, in fact, very reliable...the Marelli, however has one weak point: the ignition rotor which has a two-step shape, one for each bank of the V. The rotors frequently fail and in that case fuel continues to be provided to both banks of the engine while spark goes to only one. The result is that while the engine runs on 6 cylinders, raw fuel is flowing into the catalytic converter from the other bank. The result of that is not good. The good news? Replacement of the rotor fixes the issue instantly. A spare rotor should be carried in the car.
The chrome wheel-arch covers are not original and they marr the appearance of the car; and as has been mentioned, the headlamps (and the leather) need refreshment. Easily done.
.[/QUOTE
Well, NOT anecdotally but from my experience of owning many V12 Jaguars, I can say that the idea that they are unreliable is simply untrue. They are not difficult to work on, but if work is required it is more labour-intensive than work on a 6 or 8 cylinder car simply because of space restrictions. The good news is that the Jaguar V12 is a superb engine and very long-lived. Why it would be considered the second-to-last ("penultimate") old man's car, I have no idea.
This version of the V12 uses a Marelli ignition system, not Lucas, so Lucas jokes are not in order. The Lucas system was, in fact, very reliable...the Marelli, however has one weak point: the ignition rotor which has a two-step shape, one for each bank of the V. The rotors frequently fail and in that case fuel continues to be provided to both banks of the engine while spark goes to only one. The result is that while the engine runs on 6 cylinders, raw fuel is flowing into the catalytic converter from the other bank. The result of that is not good. The good news? Replacement of the rotor fixes the issue instantly. A spare rotor should be carried in the car.
The chrome wheel-arch covers are not original and they marr the appearance of the car; and as has been mentioned, the headlamps (and the leather) need refreshment. Easily done.