XK / XKR ( X150 ) 2006 - 2014

Xkr-s gt review

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 10-30-2013 | 11:18 PM
GhostriderXKR08's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 806
Likes: 109
From: U.S.A.
Default Xkr-s gt review

Chris Harris test drives the XKR-S GT:

 
The following 5 users liked this post by GhostriderXKR08:
axr6 (10-31-2013), Bruce H. (10-30-2013), DGL (10-31-2013), MaximA (11-05-2013), Ngarara (11-10-2013)
  #2  
Old 10-30-2013 | 11:57 PM
Octurbo's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 375
Likes: 63
From: Southern california
Default

Thanks for posting. I really enjoy chris Harris' reviews.
 
  #3  
Old 10-31-2013 | 07:34 AM
TheMCP's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 150
Likes: 38
From: Missouri
Default

Chris Harris is great... thanks for putting that up here. Is it ever just dry in England? Nice catch at 6:10 holy cow.
 
  #4  
Old 10-31-2013 | 09:50 AM
axr6's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,367
Likes: 594
From: California
Default

Looks like loads of fun for an experienced driver. It was, not surprisingly, skating in the wet but, more surprisingly it was nearly getting away from the driver at 6:10+ in the dry too. 7:40 at the Ring is rather decent for this big, heavy car. I could definitely live with one...

thanks for posting,

Albert
 
  #5  
Old 10-31-2013 | 09:58 AM
Octurbo's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 375
Likes: 63
From: Southern california
Default

7:40 is a pretty good time for a gt car. The Xkr-s does 7:50, so 10 sec faster is quite a bit, but the GT has R compound tires, which may account for 3-5 sec (just guessing there). My old 996 turbo did 7:56, so it shows how far technology has come (and hp) since 2001.
 
  #6  
Old 10-31-2013 | 03:12 PM
Bruce H.'s Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,262
Likes: 325
From: Dunsford, Ontario
Default

Originally Posted by Octurbo
7:40 is a pretty good time for a gt car. The Xkr-s does 7:50, so 10 sec faster is quite a bit, but the GT has R compound tires, which may account for 3-5 sec (just guessing there). My old 996 turbo did 7:56, so it shows how far technology has come (and hp) since 2001.
It was a pretty spectacular time just 5 years ago when the then new GT-R ran a 7:38 (probably with street tires), IIRC.
 
  #7  
Old 10-31-2013 | 06:05 PM
hawaii's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 474
Likes: 98
From: Maui
Default

You'll be glad to know Chris Harris personal car is a maroon XKR coupe. One of his videos shows that he hates to wash his cars.
I like him too!
 
  #8  
Old 10-31-2013 | 06:16 PM
Bruce H.'s Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,262
Likes: 325
From: Dunsford, Ontario
Default

Originally Posted by hawaii
You'll be glad to know Chris Harris personal car is a maroon XKR coupe. One of his videos shows that he hates to wash his cars.
I like him too!
How do you know that? He said in one video he had a 911 GT3 (991), but naturally he might own more than one car. For a while it was a Ferrari 599, but he found it waay too expensive to maintain.
 
  #9  
Old 11-01-2013 | 02:20 AM
hawaii's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 474
Likes: 98
From: Maui
Default

Here ya go Bruce!
Enjoy
 
  #10  
Old 11-01-2013 | 11:43 AM
Bruce H.'s Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,262
Likes: 325
From: Dunsford, Ontario
Default

^ thanks!
 
  #11  
Old 11-01-2013 | 12:20 PM
Stormdk's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 214
Likes: 50
From: Sweden
Default

Thx for posting...

He is by fare, in my humble oponion, the best current car reviewer... love watching his vids... looks a bit like Freddy Mercury though...
 
  #12  
Old 11-01-2013 | 02:35 PM
BruceTheQuail's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 3,985
Likes: 1,311
From: Gold Coast, Oz
Default

Yes, the review was good. This was the review that sold me on the XKR, though (if I needed any selling)
 
  #13  
Old 11-01-2013 | 10:27 PM
Lothar52's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 2,516
Likes: 388
From: Columbus, OH
Default

Agreed!!!!! Love the 175!!
 
  #14  
Old 11-02-2013 | 08:04 AM
AVMiii's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 142
Likes: 15
From: Jackson NJ 08527
Default

The reviewer said that the 175 has a higher top end, presumably just due to a modification of the electronic limiter, also different suspension tuning, but not sure what else. The S and S-GT versions have a retuned engine to up the HP to 550. Is this done on the 175? Hard for me to keep track of the subtle and not so subtle differences between stock XKR, 175, S and S-GT.
 
  #15  
Old 11-02-2013 | 03:37 PM
R_Rated's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 644
Likes: 134
Default

I like seeing the child seat in the back of Chris Harrison's xkr. Lol
 
  #16  
Old 11-04-2013 | 05:59 PM
Ngarara's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 3,425
Likes: 1,127
From: London, UK
Default

Originally Posted by AVMIII
The reviewer said that the 175 has a higher top end, presumably just due to a modification of the electronic limiter, also different suspension tuning, but not sure what else. The S and S-GT versions have a retuned engine to up the HP to 550. Is this done on the 175? Hard for me to keep track of the subtle and not so subtle differences between stock XKR, 175, S and S-GT.
The 175 is basically an XKR Sports Pack - body kit to improve aero stability, limiter increased to 174 MPH. The 75, which wasn't sold in the US, has most of the upgrades that later appeared in the R-S, but not quite the R-S HP ('only' 530). The R-S has a more in-yer-face body kit, which only increased downforce by 1%, and 20 more HP (550 PS). The S-GT takes it a step further - the guy that developed it described it to me as "slightly bonkers".
 

Last edited by Ngarara; 11-10-2013 at 04:41 PM. Reason: Correct HP difference
  #17  
Old 11-10-2013 | 05:54 AM
xk.rs's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4
Likes: 2
From: Nottingham
Default

Yep, a nice review... the GT really is something else.
 
  #18  
Old 11-13-2013 | 06:02 PM
Bruce H.'s Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,262
Likes: 325
From: Dunsford, Ontario
Default

Randy Pobst just tested one and said...

"My new favorite English car. A real track weapon. Power handling brakes looks exclusivity...wing"

Bruce
 
  #19  
Old 11-14-2013 | 12:07 AM
Rw99's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 245
Likes: 45
From: Bay Area, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Bruce H.
Randy Pobst just tested one and said...

"My new favorite English car. A real track weapon. Power handling brakes looks exclusivity...wing"

Bruce
Jeebus, Bruce, you beat me to it! I see you must also FB with Randy ;-)

Rich
 
  #20  
Old 11-14-2013 | 06:22 AM
Lothar52's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 2,516
Likes: 388
From: Columbus, OH
Default

Where can we read Randy's review?
 


Quick Reply: Xkr-s gt review



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:35 AM.