Xkr-s gt review
#1
#4
Looks like loads of fun for an experienced driver. It was, not surprisingly, skating in the wet but, more surprisingly it was nearly getting away from the driver at 6:10+ in the dry too. 7:40 at the Ring is rather decent for this big, heavy car. I could definitely live with one...
thanks for posting,
Albert
thanks for posting,
Albert
#5
#6
It was a pretty spectacular time just 5 years ago when the then new GT-R ran a 7:38 (probably with street tires), IIRC.
#7
Trending Topics
#8
How do you know that? He said in one video he had a 911 GT3 (991), but naturally he might own more than one car. For a while it was a Ferrari 599, but he found it waay too expensive to maintain.
#14
The reviewer said that the 175 has a higher top end, presumably just due to a modification of the electronic limiter, also different suspension tuning, but not sure what else. The S and S-GT versions have a retuned engine to up the HP to 550. Is this done on the 175? Hard for me to keep track of the subtle and not so subtle differences between stock XKR, 175, S and S-GT.
#16
The reviewer said that the 175 has a higher top end, presumably just due to a modification of the electronic limiter, also different suspension tuning, but not sure what else. The S and S-GT versions have a retuned engine to up the HP to 550. Is this done on the 175? Hard for me to keep track of the subtle and not so subtle differences between stock XKR, 175, S and S-GT.
Last edited by Ngarara; 11-10-2013 at 04:41 PM. Reason: Correct HP difference
#19