BG Synthetic ATF for the 5HP24. Good idea?
#1
BG Synthetic ATF for the 5HP24. Good idea?
They say it's compatible with the 5HP24 transmission (same as Audi, VW, BMW, etc.) Anybody ever use it?
http://www.bgprod.com/blendr/syntheticATF.html
http://www.bgprod.com/blendr/syntheticATF.html
#2
also....
...is it also true that the 5HP24 needs to be filled at a certain temperature in order to properly ascertain correct fluid level? Sounds right.
http://www.rangerovers.net/forum/vie...hp?f=2&t=32142
Notice one poster there said ZF Australia actually recommended the fluid in that transmission be changed every 40,000 kilometers (25k miles, approximately). That's much more frequently than I've ever heard.
If it needs to be done that often, it would be nice to use a cheaper fluid like BG.
http://www.rangerovers.net/forum/vie...hp?f=2&t=32142
Notice one poster there said ZF Australia actually recommended the fluid in that transmission be changed every 40,000 kilometers (25k miles, approximately). That's much more frequently than I've ever heard.
If it needs to be done that often, it would be nice to use a cheaper fluid like BG.
#3
I've done a number of 5HP24 changes using Castrol multi vehicle import ATF starting with my own 5HP24. I've also done a few 6HP26 trans fluid changes using Mobile 1 full Synthetic ATF, again, first in my own 6HP26. These transmissions have thousands of miles on them with no returns or complaints.
I do not buy into the Esso or lifeguard exclusivity requirement as a technical argument only as an exclusive marketing arrangement with ZF.
I recommend 50K drain/change/filter change intervals for my customers. Yes, both of these transmissions have a temperature threshold requirement for proper fluid level. Actually all automatic transmissions have this requirement, even the ones with a dipstick.
I do not buy into the Esso or lifeguard exclusivity requirement as a technical argument only as an exclusive marketing arrangement with ZF.
I recommend 50K drain/change/filter change intervals for my customers. Yes, both of these transmissions have a temperature threshold requirement for proper fluid level. Actually all automatic transmissions have this requirement, even the ones with a dipstick.
#4
#5
#6
Sorry but unlike you I like the idea staying with what the car calls for. When it comes to hydraulics I continue to use the suggested products. I have seen several problems develop from the wrong or synthetic products. Most common problem are the leaks that develop and the seals that are not compatible. When my transmission was flushed and rebuild it was the recommendation of my Transmission repair man Tom to reinstall the manufactures suggested product and we did.
For the record I am a big fan of BG products that many on this forum can tell you and Mobil 1, Castrol & Pennzoil.
For the record I am a big fan of BG products that many on this forum can tell you and Mobil 1, Castrol & Pennzoil.
#7
The phenomenally expensive dealer fluid is simply not necessary, just as the dealer costly anti-freeze is not necessary if you understand the fluid chemical compositions and their commercial replacements. I fully get those who insist on using the dealer or factory brand fluids, and I do not try to push my customers into something they're not comfortable using. They can spend their money as they please. However, for those trying to maintain these cars in a more affordable way, there are viable alternatives.
To really understand the exclusive requirements made by the manufacturers regarding these fluids, the focus needs to be on marketing not technology. There is an assumption that Esso has developed some magic transmission formula that stumps the rest of the petroleum industry. The Esso syn formula for the 5HP24 was developed in 1995, almost 15 years ago. Both Castrol multi-vehicle and Mobil 1 Synthetic ATF are much newer formulas and more than meet the specifications.
Just do it - You'll be glad you did!
Trending Topics
#8
I have researched this subject ad nauseam and have reached the same conclusion. Moreover, Ford, yes Ford, uses the ZF 6HP26 in several of it's vehicles and specifies Mercon SP fluid. After finally getting my hands on MSDS data for the Sell Oil Company fluid and the Mercon SP they look to be equivalent. They appear to have the same density, viscosity, dynamic values, color and flash point. Mercon SP can be purchased for about 1/7 of the cost of the "magic elixer". And, as Stevetech has noted other alternatives are out there. The Shell formular and Mercon SP are notable for their high flash point, lower density and additional friction modifiers. I have stopped short of actually having both fluids analyzed by GC/MS, but I suspect they are the same or very similar. Before you make your own choice you should evaluate the alternatives based on their respective MSDS data.
Cheers
Tim V.
Cheers
Tim V.
The following users liked this post:
Reverend Sam (02-19-2011)
#9
I have researched this subject ad nauseam and have reached the same conclusion. Moreover, Ford, yes Ford, uses the ZF 6HP26 in several of it's vehicles and specifies Mercon SP fluid. After finally getting my hands on MSDS data for the Sell Oil Company fluid and the Mercon SP they look to be equivalent. They appear to have the same density, viscosity, dynamic values, color and flash point. Mercon SP can be purchased for about 1/7 of the cost of the "magic elixer". And, as Stevetech has noted other alternatives are out there. The Shell formular and Mercon SP are notable for their high flash point, lower density and additional friction modifiers. I have stopped short of actually having both fluids analyzed by GC/MS, but I suspect they are the same or very similar. Before you make your own choice you should evaluate the alternatives based on their respective MSDS data.
Cheers
Tim V.
Cheers
Tim V.
#10
Sorry but unlike you I like the idea staying with what the car calls for. When it comes to hydraulics I continue to use the suggested products. I have seen several problems develop from the wrong or synthetic products. Most common problem are the leaks that develop and the seals that are not compatible. When my transmission was flushed and rebuild it was the recommendation of my Transmission repair man Tom to reinstall the manufactures suggested product and we did.
For the record I am a big fan of BG products that many on this forum can tell you and Mobil 1, Castrol & Pennzoil.
For the record I am a big fan of BG products that many on this forum can tell you and Mobil 1, Castrol & Pennzoil.
#11
Still going with an unintended mix of Mobil 1 and Castrol synthetic fluid since about July or so. Both fluids meet the same LT71141 spec; car shifts fine. I'm sure I have some original fluid floating around in there too, as it's pretty difficult (as well as unadvisable, people say) to do a complete tranny flush.
Funny thing is if the tranny fails it'll be "See? We told you so!" but if I did nothing and it failed anyway I'd get the same "See? We told you so!" from the peanut gallery-!
Funny thing is if the tranny fails it'll be "See? We told you so!" but if I did nothing and it failed anyway I'd get the same "See? We told you so!" from the peanut gallery-!
#12
I have researched this subject ad nauseam and have reached the same conclusion. Moreover, Ford, yes Ford, uses the ZF 6HP26 in several of it's vehicles and specifies Mercon SP fluid. After finally getting my hands on MSDS data for the Sell Oil Company fluid and the Mercon SP they look to be equivalent. They appear to have the same density, viscosity, dynamic values, color and flash point. Mercon SP can be purchased for about 1/7 of the cost of the "magic elixer". And, as Stevetech has noted other alternatives are out there. The Shell formular and Mercon SP are notable for their high flash point, lower density and additional friction modifiers. I have stopped short of actually having both fluids analyzed by GC/MS, but I suspect they are the same or very similar. Before you make your own choice you should evaluate the alternatives based on their respective MSDS data.
Cheers
Tim V.
Cheers
Tim V.
THANK YOU!!!
I've been tempted to change my transmission fluid, filter, magnets, etc., but the cost of the transmission fluid was putting me off. I just did some research to verify what you said about the 6HP26 transmission being used in Fords, and you're correct! It is used in Lincoln Navigators and some other Ford trucks! It's the same transmission and Ford specs the Mercon SP, which you can buy for less than $5 per quart!
This subject has come up numerous times since I've been a member here, and there are always two camps; the people who insist on sticking with factory spec and the ones who say that other ATF fluids are acceptable. This is the first time (that I have read) where someone has actually done the research, shown what other vehicles use the same transmission, and shown what fluid is specified on those cars. That's AWESOME!
#13
#14
I have read through the new posts to an old question I asked here a mouth ago. I have done my own research and have come to the same conclusion with one difference. Esso LT1141 is not the solution it is the problem. A service bulletin from jaguar has the fluid replaced. I only have a jag part number for the replacment. I can not confirm this from Jag, but I think it is the Castrol ATF replacement fluid.
#16
I dunno, to each his own, but as of today im still going strong with the Mobil1 synthetic detailed in earlier posts. It's the same spec as Esso, Jag, and all the rest with that number LTwhateveritwas.
The only difference with the synthetic is the tranny whines a bit more than it did before but otherwise shifts just fine, in DC area traffic too. That was 20k miles ago and no problems since. So not feeling any regret over passing up Jag fluid at $70 bucks a quart.
The only difference with the synthetic is the tranny whines a bit more than it did before but otherwise shifts just fine, in DC area traffic too. That was 20k miles ago and no problems since. So not feeling any regret over passing up Jag fluid at $70 bucks a quart.
#17
I went with amsiol. It meets ZF TE-ML 14A. The tanmission mones at 10 mph now (113000 miles) with no fluil change. Anything would be better than what is in it now. It looked like mud. Amsiol fluid exceeds all the specs. We will see they all say that.
Also the number of tans fluids that meet the spec. are as long as my arm.
Also the number of tans fluids that meet the spec. are as long as my arm.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FS[Western US]: XJS Wiper Motor Upgrade- 76-88 - Electrolux Style
XJsc-guy
PRIVATE For Sale / Trade or Buy Classifieds
0
09-02-2015 11:43 AM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)