XK8 / XKR ( X100 ) 1996 - 2006

On Fuel Economy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 02-03-2024, 02:39 PM
razorboy's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Las Vegas, NV, USA
Posts: 688
Received 257 Likes on 94 Posts
Default On Fuel Economy

On a recent trip from San Francisco to Anaheim and back, I noticed a pretty cool thing that I thought I would share.
My 2003 XK8 is over 20 years old now, gets driven regularly and has nearly 175k on the clock. She isn't perfect by any means, but she is mine and I love her.

To see the average fuel consumption hit over 25 miles to the gallon when the spec was 23-highway from the factory, is a sight to behold on a car with as many miles as mine has. Not sure if this is unique amongst XK8 owners but it made me smile for sure. Big old honking V8 after 20 years, exceeding the factory spec for fuel economy is pretty cool.


 
  #2  
Old 02-03-2024, 03:44 PM
RJ237's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Douglasville Ga.
Posts: 8,699
Received 2,819 Likes on 2,246 Posts
Default

I get 28-29 cruising at 80. But around town it's in the teens.
 
The following 2 users liked this post by RJ237:
kstevusa (02-03-2024), zray (02-03-2024)
  #3  
Old 02-03-2024, 03:50 PM
zray's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: on the road in NE Oklahoma
Posts: 2,838
Received 1,686 Likes on 1,001 Posts
Default

That’s pretty good indeed. And mirrors my best very closely. In the thin air of the plano alto’s of northern New Mexico I could get 25-26 mpg on the highways.

But normally my average Highway mileage is 21-23 mpg and 10-14 city mpg.

I know that lower than most, but my lead foot is mainly to blame, and to a lessor degree, the “sport” switch, which is always set to “on”.
 
The following users liked this post:
Ron McLeod (02-04-2024)
  #4  
Old 02-03-2024, 04:55 PM
bazjag's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Australia
Posts: 173
Received 33 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

On highways I regularly see 8 litres/100 kilometres which is 29.4 miles per US gallon in our 216,000 kilometre (134,000 miles) 2003 4.2 XK8. Strict speed limits in Oz of course with max 100 or 110 kph in almost all states.
 
  #5  
Old 02-03-2024, 06:57 PM
zray's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: on the road in NE Oklahoma
Posts: 2,838
Received 1,686 Likes on 1,001 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bazjag
On highways I regularly see 8 litres/100 kilometres which is 29.4 miles per US gallon in our 216,000 kilometre (134,000 miles) 2003 4.2 XK8. Strict speed limits in Oz of course with max 100 or 110 kph in almost all states.
How strict ?

what’s the likelihood you have ever gone over 110 kph ? Is the penalty worth it ?

I am surprised the wide open spaces of the Australian interior have any speed limits.

Personally, in the XKR, I chicken out over 131 mph, roughly 211 kph, as my reflexes aren’t what they used to be. The car was certainly ready to go faster.




 

Last edited by zray; 02-03-2024 at 07:05 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Flash-1973 (04-10-2024)
  #6  
Old 02-03-2024, 07:13 PM
zray's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: on the road in NE Oklahoma
Posts: 2,838
Received 1,686 Likes on 1,001 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by razorboy
Big old honking V8 after 20 years, exceeding the factory spec for fuel economy is pretty cool……”
With all due respect to these great semi-old cars, they don’t have a “big old honking V-8”.

A 4.0 L or 4.2 L wouldn’t even qualify as a SBF (small block Ford) sized engine as those start out at 4.7 L.

A honking big V-8 would be in the 7 L category (such as the Ford FE series : 390 / 427 / or 428 cubic inches displacement ).

Z
 
The following users liked this post:
Y2KJag (04-09-2024)
  #7  
Old 02-04-2024, 02:22 AM
Kuddlesworth's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 602
Received 187 Likes on 136 Posts
Default

I only ever took my XKR up to 130 mph or so, I also chickened out. I average about 22.7 mph UK gallons but driving long distance I managed 34mpg once somehow although I've never seen that since. 24-28 is normal on a long trip up to Scotland. But normal driving with a bit of fun about 20-23 mpg is to be expected.
 
The following users liked this post:
zray (02-04-2024)
  #8  
Old 02-04-2024, 02:32 AM
Pistnbroke's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: Northampton, UK
Posts: 1,860
Received 737 Likes on 503 Posts
Default

US gallon is 74% of a UK gallon......33MPG on a cruise across france at 75 mph 22 popping to Tesco
 
  #9  
Old 02-04-2024, 02:46 AM
dibbit's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Spain
Posts: 1,313
Received 516 Likes on 371 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Pistnbroke
US gallon is 74% of a UK gallon
The gallon must be the only thing known to man that is smaller in America...
 
The following 2 users liked this post by dibbit:
Flash-1973 (04-10-2024), zray (04-04-2024)
  #10  
Old 02-04-2024, 05:00 AM
MickeyR's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Townsend TN
Posts: 151
Received 82 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dibbit
The gallon must be the only thing known to man that is smaller in America...
Touche'!
 
The following users liked this post:
captainobvious1 (04-09-2024)
  #11  
Old 02-04-2024, 07:04 AM
Jon89's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 12,635
Received 4,390 Likes on 2,866 Posts
Default

It has been many years since I last checked the gas mileage on my wife's 2006 XK8 but back when I did so, it easily reached 30 mpg on the highway with her keeping the cruise control set to 72 mph during her long trips back and forth to Florida to visit her now-deceased parents. I never bothered to check the around-town gas mileage....
 
  #12  
Old 02-04-2024, 10:06 AM
zray's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: on the road in NE Oklahoma
Posts: 2,838
Received 1,686 Likes on 1,001 Posts
Default

A bit off topic:

Anyone know the history of the divergence of the UK and USA gallon measurements ???

I read where the USA gallon is based on the “wine gallon” and the UK or Imperial gallon is based on the “ale gallon”.

That explanation doesn’t tell me much.



Z
 

Last edited by zray; 02-04-2024 at 10:10 AM.
  #13  
Old 02-04-2024, 12:16 PM
JACKP's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: Elkin N.C.
Posts: 236
Received 70 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

I have gotten.32 MPG on a road trip. 2005 XK8
 
  #14  
Old 02-04-2024, 01:10 PM
SeismicGuy's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,361
Received 540 Likes on 403 Posts
Default

"Fuel economy" is kind of an oxymoron when it comes to these cars. I have gotten great mileage on my XKR as well as the car it replaced (1995 Corvette) but ONLY when doing extended driving on open freeways. On the typical day-to-day street driving both vehicles get 12-15 mpg. On a tangential note since the wife and I replaced the "decent car" (her words) which was a 2012 Acura TL with our 2024 Lexus NX350H, I have been obsessed with how much mileage that hybrid gets and it is the opposite of non-hybrid vehicles. On the routine street driving we get up to 50+ mpg but on the freeways it drops down to maybe 38 mpg.
 
  #15  
Old 02-07-2024, 08:29 AM
JimmyL's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 1,787
Received 417 Likes on 308 Posts
Default From Google

Originally Posted by zray
A bit off topic:

Anyone know the history of the divergence of the UK and USA gallon measurements ???

I read where the USA gallon is based on the “wine gallon” and the UK or Imperial gallon is based on the “ale gallon”.

That explanation doesn’t tell me much.

Z
"The gallon originated as the base of systems for measuring wine and beer in England. The sizes of gallon used in these two systems were different from each other: the first was based on the wine gallon (equal in size to the US gallon), and the second one either the ale gallon or the larger imperial gallon."
"The Queen Anne wine gallon, defined as 231 in³, which the US uses for all liquid. (In metric, it is 3.785 411 784 L)."
Nothing much changed around here since Queen Anne.

I like the size of the pints mostly. ;^)


 
The following 2 users liked this post by JimmyL:
michaelh (02-07-2024), zray (04-04-2024)
  #16  
Old 02-07-2024, 09:01 AM
michaelh's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Jersey, Channel Islands
Posts: 4,172
Received 2,400 Likes on 1,556 Posts
Default

Britannica explains it:
https://www.britannica.com/science/m...s-and-measures

I get around 14/15 mpg locally, which may be atypical due to the road system. I was pleasantly surprised when I did the first French trip with her, as consumption improved to around 25mpg.

We don't run Jaguars because we're fuel-economy conscious...
 

Last edited by michaelh; 02-07-2024 at 09:51 AM.
The following users liked this post:
cdma (04-09-2024)
  #17  
Old 02-07-2024, 09:35 AM
kstevusa's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Middle Tn. near Hsv. Al
Posts: 731
Received 569 Likes on 275 Posts
Default

FYI, The 2003 XK8 with 165K miles averages about 27-28 MPG (US gal) on interstate trips. Speeds at 70-80 MPH. I record mileage and number of gallons at fill up. Miles divided by gallons equal actual MPG. The digital read out is optimistic so of little use to me.
 
  #18  
Old 02-07-2024, 04:51 PM
Throwback's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2022
Posts: 169
Received 100 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

I have a 2002 XKR with the 5 speed and 45K miles on it, and I average 15-16 US MPG mixed urban/highway driving... best I've ever gotten was about 25 mpg on a long highway run. Sitting at lights kills economy in these cars. Well, that and booting it. The 6 speed/4.2 combination does make a significant difference.

I will note that since I changed my upstream O2 sensors I actually get 2mpg better economy than before. Been tempted to get a new MAF as well. AFAIK hte downstream sensors don't have any input on fuel trims and are used for emissions monitoring only (and thus why they are not present in all markets).
 
  #19  
Old 02-07-2024, 07:55 PM
zray's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: on the road in NE Oklahoma
Posts: 2,838
Received 1,686 Likes on 1,001 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Throwback
”…….Been tempted to get a new MAF as well. AFAIK hte downstream sensors don't have any input on fuel trims and are used for emissions monitoring only (and thus why they are not present in all markets).
if you do get a new MAF sensor be sure to get the one for the 4.0 XKR (or XJR). The XK8 is not the same , and that’s a shame as it’s used in many different cars and is much cheaper.

i tried several budget MAF sensors that were advertised as being correct for the XKR, and the car ran horribly with them. Finally I found a proper XKR sensor (Denso) at a slight discount from a Jag dealer and all was well

Z
 
  #20  
Old 02-07-2024, 08:11 PM
Throwback's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2022
Posts: 169
Received 100 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by zray
if you do get a new MAF sensor be sure to get the one for the 4.0 XKR (or XJR). The XK8 is not the same , and that’s a shame as it’s used in many different cars and is much cheaper.

i tried several budget MAF sensors that were advertised as being correct for the XKR, and the car ran horribly with them. Finally I found a proper XKR sensor (Denso) at a slight discount from a Jag dealer and all was well

Z
Interesting; I got proper denso O2 sensors for roughly this reason (plus changing them is a $%^& and didn't want to chance having to do it twice) so I'll be extra careful if I do - I'd seen mention that the MAF was shared with some Mazdas, but evidently not for the XKR.
 


Quick Reply: On Fuel Economy



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:11 PM.