help locating the wire to the check engine light.
#1
help locating the wire to the check engine light.
I have a small evap leak that I have learned is something that I will have to live with. I have had a bunch of work done to the evaporations system and I don't think the expense of fixing it is worth it or even possible. The leak is tripping the check engine light and I don't like the check engine light. The car is a 2000 xkr and I don't really feel that the check engine light is that important to me. I love that the car has a computer that reads codes and I have a good reader that I use but I don't want the light anymore. It seems like a simple thing to clip the wire from the computer to the light. I know that this is a very sticky subject and I'm not sure if this information should even be in the public domain so if anyone knows about this and could private message me how to do it i'd appreciate it. Thanks!
#2
Tis soldered to the board. If you wanted to do this, you need to remove the speedo, open the board, locate the correct led and carefully desolder the leads. You might want to replace it with a regular diode to keep the circuit happy.
To be clear, this will not affect the codes read by you or by any state inspection.
For future reference, it is also probably illegal in your and other jurisdictions to then sell the car in this condition.
To be clear, this will not affect the codes read by you or by any state inspection.
For future reference, it is also probably illegal in your and other jurisdictions to then sell the car in this condition.
#3
Hi,
My engine check light was driving me nuts!
i believe the Engine Management Computer has been replaced with one from the next year model. As such it keeps coming up with a code saying that the lambda sensor heater has failed when I don’t believe a 97 XK8 has a lambda heater.
in desperation I removed the speedo and simply slipped a small piece of plastic tube over the light so it is now invisible. I was afraid that if I disconnected the light that it would bring up a warning code in itself.
i must say that the inane complexity of these engine management systems with their proclivity to throw up a fault and put the engine in ‘limp home’ mode is a real nuisance and complete overkill.
does anyone know if there is a way of disabling or permanently over-riding some of the less relevant codes.
It certainly increases a car’s planned obsolescence with issues like you have mentioned
regards
al
My engine check light was driving me nuts!
i believe the Engine Management Computer has been replaced with one from the next year model. As such it keeps coming up with a code saying that the lambda sensor heater has failed when I don’t believe a 97 XK8 has a lambda heater.
in desperation I removed the speedo and simply slipped a small piece of plastic tube over the light so it is now invisible. I was afraid that if I disconnected the light that it would bring up a warning code in itself.
i must say that the inane complexity of these engine management systems with their proclivity to throw up a fault and put the engine in ‘limp home’ mode is a real nuisance and complete overkill.
does anyone know if there is a way of disabling or permanently over-riding some of the less relevant codes.
It certainly increases a car’s planned obsolescence with issues like you have mentioned
regards
al
#4
As such it keeps coming up with a code saying that the lambda sensor heater has failed when I don’t believe a 97 XK8 has a lambda heater.
But lets say the O2 sensor had actually failed and stuck low, (which is a $30 fix) - the ECU sets the " very rich" code and turns on the light, it gets ignored or is unseen for long enough and all your plugs get gunged up, performance goes to pot, fuel consumption is horrendous and shortly you will destroy the cat, - a $30 fix turns into a couple of '000.
#5
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Jersey, Channel Islands
Posts: 4,199
Received 2,427 Likes
on
1,569 Posts
+1
The ECM fitted to the 97 is unique to the X100 and that year, so it's unlikely any replacement will have been sourced from a later model.
The pressures of performance, mimimising emissions and fuel economy mandate tight control of the motor's fuelling, hence the complexity. There are many issues that can cause the warning - not all of them will necessarily be immediately apparent.
I would do some further investigation.
The ECM fitted to the 97 is unique to the X100 and that year, so it's unlikely any replacement will have been sourced from a later model.
The pressures of performance, mimimising emissions and fuel economy mandate tight control of the motor's fuelling, hence the complexity. There are many issues that can cause the warning - not all of them will necessarily be immediately apparent.
I would do some further investigation.
#6
Thank you Wight8
i shall investigate
it does appear to be running well although it is currently in dry dock for a failed power steering pump.
why a low km car has failed a ps pump I have no idea, I have generally found them to be rather bullet proof.
Nothing has tested my patience like the XK8. My other Jags have always exceeded expectations but this has been a real problem child in the 10 years I have owned it.
regards
al
i shall investigate
it does appear to be running well although it is currently in dry dock for a failed power steering pump.
why a low km car has failed a ps pump I have no idea, I have generally found them to be rather bullet proof.
Nothing has tested my patience like the XK8. My other Jags have always exceeded expectations but this has been a real problem child in the 10 years I have owned it.
regards
al
#7
Trending Topics
#8
Hi,
My engine check light was driving me nuts!
i believe the Engine Management Computer has been replaced with one from the next year model. As such it keeps coming up with a code saying that the lambda sensor heater has failed when I don’t believe a 97 XK8 has a lambda heater.
in desperation I removed the speedo and simply slipped a small piece of plastic tube over the light so it is now invisible. I was afraid that if I disconnected the light that it would bring up a warning code in itself.
i must say that the inane complexity of these engine management systems with their proclivity to throw up a fault and put the engine in ‘limp home’ mode is a real nuisance and complete overkill.
My engine check light was driving me nuts!
i believe the Engine Management Computer has been replaced with one from the next year model. As such it keeps coming up with a code saying that the lambda sensor heater has failed when I don’t believe a 97 XK8 has a lambda heater.
in desperation I removed the speedo and simply slipped a small piece of plastic tube over the light so it is now invisible. I was afraid that if I disconnected the light that it would bring up a warning code in itself.
i must say that the inane complexity of these engine management systems with their proclivity to throw up a fault and put the engine in ‘limp home’ mode is a real nuisance and complete overkill.
So, California Air Resources Board (CARB) founded in '67 (by Reagan, interestingly) tried to figure out something to do to make the air cleaner. Eventually, they (CARB) invented and required OBD (on board diagnostics) to check/reduce emissions in vehicles in concert with increasing computerization of automobiles, but was too early and it mostly failed from lack of standardization/crappy computers. Around the mid 1990's, just as the XK8 was being designed, everything (worldwide industry, regulation) conspired to make a much more effective and standardized system OBD-II, the system you are burdened/delighted with.
This reduces the emissions of various things, including the EVAP system in the XK8/R to limit gasoline vented into the air and other similar systems. Benefit, the air in Los Angeles now only reeks of ozone from the power lines, not car emissions.
However, important point, these systems are now the law in various places (like every place). There are some exceptions. For example, various US states do not have emissions testing (depending on how polluted they are according to the EPA). My own state, for example, has various counties that have emissions testing (the populous ones) with an exception for cars 20 years old or greater. Even California has an exception for cars from 1975 or before.
The complexity comes from design to the regulations, Jag had to design to those requirements. But the CEL (check engine light, service engine soon, malfunction indicator lamp...) is the consumer face of all that complexity. In the US, EPA regulations require various functions for this lamp. Thus, you can mess with your own lamp in the US, since this is the US, but you can't sell a car to drive on the public highways with this function "messed with" (violation of the Clean Air Act in the US, felony, potentially up to $200,000 fine).
On the other hand, I feel for you and your phantom lambda heater.
#9
In the UK and no doubt other European countries, disconnecting the check engine light will cause a fail on the annual inspection. Hence why you can buy on eBay a circuit to light the CEL up, then switch it off again to get the car through its MOT.
Very naughty and as has been pointed out, could easily lead to far more damage down the road.
Very naughty and as has been pointed out, could easily lead to far more damage down the road.
#11
I know that other modules (TCM for example) can request the CEL illuminated as part of a code set and that request is being sent out on the CAN bus - not as far as I know awaiting a direct request from the ECU.
#12
Interesting I have never heard that. Does that not just apply to the monitors needed to pass in Mode 6 on start up (we do not have that test as part of the UK inspection so I am not familiar with it)?
I know that other modules (TCM for example) can request the CEL illuminated as part of a code set and that request is being sent out on the CAN bus - not as far as I know awaiting a direct request from the ECU.
I know that other modules (TCM for example) can request the CEL illuminated as part of a code set and that request is being sent out on the CAN bus - not as far as I know awaiting a direct request from the ECU.
What I don't know is if TCM indicates a MIL in a condition without ECM MIL, whether that causes ECM to turn the CAN Engine MIL on, or does INST just read the TCM CAN MIL message independently?
#14
This my understanding of the INST PK/ECM relationship.
The INST PK has the Check Engine Light ON as default upon startup.
The ECM commands the MIL OFF if all functions are within parameters upon startup.
The ECM can command the MIL ON if certain conditions are met during vehicle operations.
The TCM or ABS can communicate with the ECM on the CAN bus to command the MIL ON if certain conditions are met.
I have no idea what conditions are required to command the INST PK MIL during vehicle operation except what the DTC guide describes.
It seems to be a logical sequence.
The INST PK has the Check Engine Light ON as default upon startup.
The ECM commands the MIL OFF if all functions are within parameters upon startup.
The ECM can command the MIL ON if certain conditions are met during vehicle operations.
The TCM or ABS can communicate with the ECM on the CAN bus to command the MIL ON if certain conditions are met.
I have no idea what conditions are required to command the INST PK MIL during vehicle operation except what the DTC guide describes.
It seems to be a logical sequence.
The following users liked this post:
crbass (10-29-2020)
#15
I happened to have had the send and receive CAN columns hidden when I looked at my spreadsheet yesterday, so your observation answers the question about potential TCM contribution to P-codes, comes through the ECM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jazzwineman
S-Type / S type R Supercharged V8 ( X200 )
17
06-29-2011 05:57 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)