XK8 / XKR ( X100 ) 1996 - 2006
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

looking at 2004-2006 XK8's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 01-18-2011, 11:32 PM
xandrew46's Avatar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 27
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default looking at 2004-2006 XK8's

I am moving up from my 1998 XJ8L to an XK8, preferably in the MY 2004-06 range. Having had tensioner and water pump issues with the 1998, are there any major or big minor problems I can expect with the XK8?

Also, there seems to be a steady bump up in price for each model year, and then with the 2006 MY the prices start increasing much more. Other than the 5-year-old car mentality, is this any other reason for the break point at MY 05-06?

Finally, what is the benefit of factory installed navigation system, now 5 years old, vs something mountable that is brand new, other than appearance, which is no small thing in a Jaguar.

Thanks
 
  #2  
Old 01-18-2011, 11:40 PM
DaleD's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Marin County, CA, USA - Just north of San Francisco
Posts: 257
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Look carefully at/for a late 2002R - metal tensioners after August 2002 build, and a much more reliable transmission - Mercedes. DaleD
 
The following 2 users liked this post by DaleD:
joolz (01-19-2011), xandrew46 (01-29-2011)
  #3  
Old 01-19-2011, 12:03 AM
waterloo's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: So cal
Posts: 160
Received 25 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

I figure the later the better. If you recall, Jaguar beat Lexus and tied Buick for first in dependability on their 2006 models, primarily because their platforms where older and most the kinks had been worked out. But any of the 4.2 liter models should be safe. There is no advantage to the navigation, not even appearance. In my opinion the gauges look better and the navigation is outdated and only going to become more obsolete with time. Only thing i would change about the xk8 i bought would be to have the gauges instead of the navigation, so don't pay extra for navigation.
 
The following 2 users liked this post by waterloo:
joolz (01-19-2011), xandrew46 (01-29-2011)
  #4  
Old 01-19-2011, 07:01 AM
test point's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Ellijay
Posts: 5,385
Received 1,111 Likes on 932 Posts
Default

Out of all the issues corrected through 10 years of field trials the only one Jaguar never fixed is the convertible top hydraulics until the '07 model. The styling update in '07 may be some of the reason for the spike in '06 sale prices. A lot prefer the older look.

The factory GPS is outdated and not supported. Don't bother. Big changes coming for GPS units. Everything going on-line.
 
The following users liked this post:
xandrew46 (01-29-2011)
  #5  
Old 01-19-2011, 07:25 AM
WhiteXKR's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Arlington VA USA
Posts: 7,652
Received 2,985 Likes on 2,124 Posts
Default

I agree with all the comments. Do not pay a penny extra for the outdated nav.

The only thing I will add, is that if you find the perfect car, and it happens to have the factory nav, it can be updated with a Garmin GVN-53, (which is upgradeable with new maps) and a RGB video converter for about $700 less installation. If that is important to you, figure that into the cost.
 
The following users liked this post:
xandrew46 (01-29-2011)
  #6  
Old 01-19-2011, 10:55 AM
SeismicGuy's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,351
Received 539 Likes on 402 Posts
Default

Having or not having the NAV would not be high on my list if I were shopping around. Most important for me would be location of the vehicle, miles on the odometer, followed by model year, then color. Remember, these were not high number production cars so you may not find exactly everything you want in the previously owned market.

Doug
 
The following users liked this post:
xandrew46 (01-29-2011)
  #7  
Old 01-19-2011, 01:31 PM
cohibarandy's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 260
Received 18 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

I am really happy with my '05 XKR . It seams like it is really a high quality machine.
The later the better I am thinking..
 
The following users liked this post:
xandrew46 (01-29-2011)
  #8  
Old 01-19-2011, 10:29 PM
beg3yrs's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Tucson, Arizona USA
Posts: 326
Received 38 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

When I was researching a purchase I too saw the price bump at just under five years. My thought was there was still some factory warranty left which has some value.
 
The following users liked this post:
xandrew46 (01-29-2011)
  #9  
Old 01-20-2011, 06:30 AM
Glenn Barickman's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Geneva, IL USA
Posts: 204
Received 53 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

the bump in price may have something to do with getting a loan also. It hard to get one on a car older than 5 years so dealers don't want them.
 
The following users liked this post:
xandrew46 (01-29-2011)
  #10  
Old 01-20-2011, 06:44 AM
Marco's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Warner Robins, GA
Posts: 158
Received 27 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

I was looking for an 06 but bought an 04. Its the condition and mileage that counts as the cars are almost identical. Mine only had 16k on it. They are out there you just have to be patient until one comes up and they don't last long.
 
The following users liked this post:
xandrew46 (01-29-2011)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tlynch
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
23
12-31-2020 01:58 PM
mikiep
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
14
12-20-2019 07:37 PM
CXJ
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
77
08-29-2017 08:41 AM
Pristine97XK8Convertible
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
17
04-28-2017 11:08 AM
Johnken
X-Type ( X400 )
2
10-02-2015 10:12 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: looking at 2004-2006 XK8's



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:57 PM.