XK8 / XKR ( X100 ) 1996 - 2006

What is it which makes the X100 so unreliable?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #121  
Old 02-17-2018, 07:45 PM
giandanielxk8's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 3,550
Received 1,452 Likes on 780 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jeagar
Just came across a very interesting review/buyer's guide: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9JL1JEPwkSI

Posting it here as it may be unknown to people in the UK and U.S., since it's from a Dutch site. But it has English subtitles.

He gives a very long list of issues and things to check. Most of the stuff was covered in the thread. But there are a few things which I'm hearing for the first time. From more major things like suspension problems to smaller things such as the key battery issue.

He also mentions some body panels are plastic and others are aluminium? I was not aware there were aluminium panels. Maybe the subtitles mistranslated it. Although somebody also mentioned aluminium in the thread. What parts are aluminium, if any? And I'm thinking plastic are only the front and rear bumpers?
Sorry about confusing you there. I was referencing the X150 XKs when I mentioned the aluminum bodied cars.

The X100s are steel bodied. The only body panels that are plastic are the bumper covers, both front and rear. These cars are built tough with thick gauge panels, thick bumper covers, and even glass headlights housings.
 
  #122  
Old 02-17-2018, 09:23 PM
oldmots's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Chesapeake Bay area, Virginia
Posts: 1,714
Received 324 Likes on 276 Posts
Default

I bought my 06 XKR in 08 still under warranty. It has never required a repair, just regular maintenance. I have owned two new American cars, a Mustang and a Malibu that had engine failures in the first three months of ownership. This myth of poor X100 reliability is just that... a myth.
 
  #123  
Old 02-17-2018, 10:08 PM
JRabbit's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 233
Received 87 Likes on 63 Posts
Default Jaguar Arbitrage

Originally Posted by Jeagar
The biggest site for car sales in Europe is autoscout.

I'm not sure buying one in the U.S. makes sense. After shipping and import taxes you can probably just buy a local one.

Besides U.S. cars probably have different specs which won't match European law (?). Also many European cars are de-tuned when they are sent to the U.S. Or they are heavier because of extra safety stuff the U.S. requires. I'm not aware of the changes in specs. So unless I could have them for much cheaper even after shipping and import taxes, I will stick to an European car.
Thanks for the tip. I checked AutoScout--Germany. Asking prices ranged from 9,000 EU for several high mile XKR coupes (2001-2006) to high of 15,000 EU for a RHD 4.2 litre xkr coupe with 128000 km. The range of asking prices on AutoScout Germany seems comparable to the US market. It would appear that there is not much of an opportunity for cross-border arbitrage in the used XK8/XKR market. Erata--saw a couple of ultra low mileage X100 XKRs with 30-40k EU asking price. They were reported to have 28,000 KMs. One was a Silverstone Edition. I have to think that these are outliers.

https://www.autoscout24.com/offers/j...877?cldtidx=16

The various technical sites i checked did not report any difference in the rated HP power, torque or weights for the US cars as against the rest of the world. My understanding is that all of the cars were electronically limited to 155 mph and all have same 0-60 specs etc. Same brake/wheel/tyre/lighting options in the catalog. Pictures of the German XKRs on AutoScout look comparable to the US cars other than the color of side markers (white v. amber). Same bumpers and airbag set up. You can be sure that the US consumer bar would be all over Jaguar USA if the US cars were detuned from the published performance specs or were overweight. US cars probably have different DVDs in the Nav systems than EU cars although mine will provide directions in German or French if requested. Someone may have more detailed list of differences, if any.
 

Last edited by JRabbit; 02-17-2018 at 10:16 PM. Reason: More infor
  #124  
Old 02-17-2018, 11:16 PM
LuvmyXJS''s Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 509
Received 404 Likes on 219 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by zray


my remarks were mainly intended to be in reference to the mechanical aspects of the car, not the cosmetics. Even so, I've purchased several Shelby's that had well over 200,00 documented miles. The interiors were in very good shape, and the paint was original. As you say, it ALL depends how the car has been cared for.

mechanically speaking, if cars from the 1960's with 200,000+ miles, mainly muscle types, can be in very good condition after 50+ years, without the benefits of modern synthetic oils for most of those years, then I don't see why a modern car, which has so many more advantages, cannot also be in fine condition with 200,000+ miles on the clock. The engine certainly won't be worn out at that stage . With proper attention paid to quality lubricants there no reason why modern engines can't reach 400,000+ miles without needing an overhaul.

Z
This topic of higher mileage vehicles and overall wear really has new relevance in today's age of internet buying due to the distances that many of us are now dealing with when looking at potential purchases. Photos can tell a lot but also hide a lot.

The main reason I look for lower mileage and very well kept examples from first or second owners is because if I am going to travel great distances out of my immediate area to look at and purchase a potential vehicle I want to do everything I can to mitigate the possibility of buying a poor example. Dealers and professional car flippers are experts at making a poor example look like a real gem. They know what to say and how to present their vehicle so as to make it appear to be everything you are wanting to buy.

If I contact a seller and I am told they have had a vehicle for a short time I seldom look further at that vehicle because more often then not you are dealing with a flipper and may have just done extensive body work etc. on the vehicle to hide damages etc. I prefer to deal with the original owner if possible because if they say the vehicle has never been in a accident they know they can be held liable if they misrepresent things. Very easy for a dealer or non original owner to say " I see no signs of a accident repair " because they know they cannot be held liable for something they can say they had any direct knowledge of.

It has been my experience that vehicles with higher miles like 150K + have wear in areas that I just am not willing to live with. There are exceptions of course but when you are having to make decisions so often at a great distance it is important to be extra careful as you may not see certain problems or issues until you are home.
 
The following users liked this post:
Johnken (02-18-2018)
  #125  
Old 02-18-2018, 12:59 AM
zray's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: on the road in NE Oklahoma
Posts: 2,869
Received 1,701 Likes on 1,013 Posts
Default

Being a long distance buyer does have its disadvantages. Many sellers think that once you have travelled 100's of miles to look at their car, that you won't want to go home empty handed. I've surprised several sellers by telling them "no thanks" and walking away from their highly misrepresented car. For me it's all part of the chase.

Of course, you can pay to have a car inspected, which I have also done on occasion. Often forum members have looked at cars in their area for me.. but ones own eyes are the best tools, imadgine the legal fees of suing a professional car inspector because they missed an expensive flaw. Ugh !

despite the seemingly drawbacks of buying a high mileage car, from my experience in offer 50 years of buying and selling cars, I'd rather have a car that's already been tested, and repaired if necessary, than the seldom driven low mileage garage queen. Every time I've bought a car that's been a low mileage classic it's taken me 1 to 2 years to get it to be reliable enough to drive anywhere worry free.

Low milage is not an indicaot of quality, or reliability, if I had bought my current XKR, at 50,000 miles instead of 116,000 miles, I'd be forking over another $10,000 in repairs as a result of my fixation on low milage.. No thanks..


Z
 

Last edited by zray; 02-18-2018 at 01:21 AM.
  #126  
Old 02-18-2018, 03:17 AM
smoggyx100's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Rotherham UK
Posts: 354
Received 112 Likes on 72 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jeagar
But so, does regular maintenance here means regular repairs ? Means being under your car every other week or even every other month?
To answer this specific question in my experiance:-

1) Deal with the identified preventative issues ASAP (ie Tensioners on a 4.0) (My ZF5 gearbox on a 4.0 was refurbished which solves the inherrant weekness)

2) Weekley/ Monthly: The usual fluid and tyre pressure and a wash (like every car should)

3) Annual Service: 1 yr or 10,000 miles

4) Deal with any issue as it arrises - the quicker its addressed the better and usually cheaper.

5) XKR and 4.2 gearboxes are fine, just do the fluid changes on it.

6) Be very picky on the car you buy, one that's been looked after as above is worth a lot more in the long run.

7) In the UK "UNDERSEAL IT EVERY YEAR" if your using in in the slt season!
 
The following users liked this post:
Jeagar (02-18-2018)
  #127  
Old 02-18-2018, 05:28 PM
Jeagar's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 353
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by giandanielxk8


Sorry about confusing you there. I was referencing the X150 XKs when I mentioned the aluminum bodied cars.

The X100s are steel bodied. The only body panels that are plastic are the bumper covers, both front and rear. These cars are built tough with thick gauge panels, thick bumper covers, and even glass headlights housings.
Oh OK. X150 makes more sense.

By the way, I would think the rear quarters are integrated into the body as most monocoques?
 
  #128  
Old 02-18-2018, 05:34 PM
Jeagar's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 353
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Doug
I've been visiting this thread on-and-off.







This brings me to something I've been meaning to mention. More specifically, I've meant to ask if the OP was an avid DIYer. If the question came up before, I must've missed it.

To at least some degree, but I think a large degree, personally, the opinion of a car's reliability, and overall ownership experience, will be higher among DIYers.

A non-DIYer is faced with different and often greater challenges than a DIYer. There's the much higher out-of-pocket expense, inconvenience of waiting for shop scheduling, finding a trustworthy shop, and so forth.

A DIYer faces less expense, does repairs on his own schedule, and....as often as not....actually enjoys repairing and servicing the car. Doing so it part of the enjoyment; there's lots of personal satisfaction involved. Of course everyone has their limits but a DIYer will often shrug off as "no big deal" something that a non-DIYer finds to be very expensive, inconvenient, and aggravating.

Cheers
DD
I believe this is true. That the opinion of a car's reliability, and overall ownership experience, will be higher among DIYers. Because to DIYers everything seems "easy" or easier.

As for myself, not a very advanced DIYer. I have done my own service such as changing spark plugs, my own engine oil, changing brake pads, done my own compression tests, changed a cracked engine head once, repaired my front bumper's spoiler and other smaller things. But have never for example dropped an engine or gearbox let alone rebuilt one.
 
  #129  
Old 02-18-2018, 05:35 PM
Jeagar's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 353
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sklimii
Jeager the suspension components are not bad to replace as DIY. The bushings and upper shock mounts are rubber and deteriorate over time. I've replaced my front upper shock mounts, shocks, springs, upper ball joints and all front bushings with ease- forum has all the steps necessary
OK, good to know. Do people replace the rubber parts with something more durable?
 
  #130  
Old 02-18-2018, 05:50 PM
Jeagar's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 353
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JRabbit
Thanks for the tip. I checked AutoScout--Germany. Asking prices ranged from 9,000 EU for several high mile XKR coupes (2001-2006) to high of 15,000 EU for a RHD 4.2 litre xkr coupe with 128000 km. The range of asking prices on AutoScout Germany seems comparable to the US market. It would appear that there is not much of an opportunity for cross-border arbitrage in the used XK8/XKR market. Erata--saw a couple of ultra low mileage X100 XKRs with 30-40k EU asking price. They were reported to have 28,000 KMs. One was a Silverstone Edition. I have to think that these are outliers.

https://www.autoscout24.com/offers/j...877?cldtidx=16

The various technical sites i checked did not report any difference in the rated HP power, torque or weights for the US cars as against the rest of the world. My understanding is that all of the cars were electronically limited to 155 mph and all have same 0-60 specs etc. Same brake/wheel/tyre/lighting options in the catalog. Pictures of the German XKRs on AutoScout look comparable to the US cars other than the color of side markers (white v. amber). Same bumpers and airbag set up. You can be sure that the US consumer bar would be all over Jaguar USA if the US cars were detuned from the published performance specs or were overweight. US cars probably have different DVDs in the Nav systems than EU cars although mine will provide directions in German or French if requested. Someone may have more detailed list of differences, if any.
RHD cars are out of question and they are definitely cheaper. But don't want a RHD to drive in LHD traffic.

I'm not seeing any 2001 and newer XKRs priced at 9000. Actually no XKR of any year for that price. High mileage XKRs start over 15000 for 4.0 cars. 4.2 XKRs there is one priced at around 19000 with almost 160K on the clock and then the next one is priced at 35000. There are basically four 4.2 cars listed at the moment. 2 of them convertible and one RHD.

4.2 XK8s also start at 19000. Older 4.0 XK8 with higher mileage can be had for 9000 and over.
 
  #131  
Old 02-18-2018, 05:59 PM
Jeagar's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 353
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LuvmyXJS'
This topic of higher mileage vehicles and overall wear really has new relevance in today's age of internet buying due to the distances that many of us are now dealing with when looking at potential purchases. Photos can tell a lot but also hide a lot.

The main reason I look for lower mileage and very well kept examples from first or second owners is because if I am going to travel great distances out of my immediate area to look at and purchase a potential vehicle I want to do everything I can to mitigate the possibility of buying a poor example. Dealers and professional car flippers are experts at making a poor example look like a real gem. They know what to say and how to present their vehicle so as to make it appear to be everything you are wanting to buy.

If I contact a seller and I am told they have had a vehicle for a short time I seldom look further at that vehicle because more often then not you are dealing with a flipper and may have just done extensive body work etc. on the vehicle to hide damages etc. I prefer to deal with the original owner if possible because if they say the vehicle has never been in a accident they know they can be held liable if they misrepresent things. Very easy for a dealer or non original owner to say " I see no signs of a accident repair " because they know they cannot be held liable for something they can say they had any direct knowledge of.

It has been my experience that vehicles with higher miles like 150K + have wear in areas that I just am not willing to live with. There are exceptions of course but when you are having to make decisions so often at a great distance it is important to be extra careful as you may not see certain problems or issues until you are home.
Long distance buying definitely complicates things for higher mileage cars.

I took a look at the XK8 I mentioned before. 1998 with around 120k on the clock priced at 12000 at a local dealer. It looked ok enough. Paint is not perfect, interior shows signs of wear. It seems to be lowered as I could barely stick my finger between the rear wheel arch and tyre.

I spoke to the dealer and he became very defensive and aggressive when I asked if the plastic tensioners had been replaced. I kept my cool and after a few other questions he basically told me if it was a perfect car he would be asking the double, which is the asking price today and gave me some BS sales pitch of how the car will be a classic soon etc. I asked for a test drive and he said it can be arranged but to call him a day or so before. In other words, I think this car is trouble. The thing is, for the price and the overall look one might drive from far away to see it. Just to get disappointed once he actually sees it and talks to the seller.

At least lower mileage cars have a better chance to be in good condition and seem less risky to travel for. If the car belongs to a Jaguar fan he might have replaced the tensioners, water pump etc even before they broke, since he would know they are a weak point.
 
  #132  
Old 02-18-2018, 07:48 PM
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Summerville, South Carolina
Posts: 24,834
Received 4,339 Likes on 3,749 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jeagar
OK, good to know. Do people replace the rubber parts with something more durable?

for bushings, it seems to be a 50/50 split between folks staying with OEM or going with poly. For the upper mounts, I have seen the light and will be changing to poly


When I first replaced my upper shock mounts, I went with the OEM bushings and OEM upper mounts which have a hard foam insert between 2 metal discs, but after 2 years of Charleston roads, I had to replace some of the bushings so I went with poly. Last fall, I noticed the Upper mounts were starting to deteriorate again so I went with poly upper shock mounts from Welsh and got the poly bushings for the rear


I haven't installed the rear bushings yet but they are on my list for this spring along with new shocks, isolators and lowering springs



Failing front shock mounts - will drop ride height about an inch and you will see the foam crumbling around the top of the shock
 
The following users liked this post:
Jeagar (02-19-2018)
  #133  
Old 02-19-2018, 09:35 AM
zray's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: on the road in NE Oklahoma
Posts: 2,869
Received 1,701 Likes on 1,013 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jeagar
"............I'm not seeing any 2001 and newer XKRs priced at 9000. Actually no XKR of any year for that price. High mileage XKRs start over 15000 for 4.0 cars.........." .
My 2002 XKR was listed on eBay in early January for $8,000 buy it now.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/2002-Jaguar...72.m2749.l2649

z
 
  #134  
Old 02-19-2018, 10:49 AM
Jeagar's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 353
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sklimii
for bushings, it seems to be a 50/50 split between folks staying with OEM or going with poly. For the upper mounts, I have seen the light and will be changing to poly


When I first replaced my upper shock mounts, I went with the OEM bushings and OEM upper mounts which have a hard foam insert between 2 metal discs, but after 2 years of Charleston roads, I had to replace some of the bushings so I went with poly. Last fall, I noticed the Upper mounts were starting to deteriorate again so I went with poly upper shock mounts from Welsh and got the poly bushings for the rear


I haven't installed the rear bushings yet but they are on my list for this spring along with new shocks, isolators and lowering springs



Failing front shock mounts - will drop ride height about an inch and you will see the foam crumbling around the top of the shock
Poly is what I was thinking. It should be more durable than the stock rubber. But how does it affect the ride, if at all?
 
  #135  
Old 02-19-2018, 10:51 AM
Jeagar's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 353
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by zray


My 2002 XKR was listed on eBay in early January for $8,000 buy it now.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/2002-Jaguar...72.m2749.l2649

z
Well, yeah, in the U.S.

There is only one place where cars are cheaper than in the UK and that is the U.S.

Wish X100s were that dirty cheap here. $8000 is just over 6000 Euros. That would be a great price for a good car for sure.
 
  #136  
Old 02-19-2018, 11:33 AM
MikeAlford's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Cornwall, UK
Posts: 112
Received 32 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

The've all said it here. Jaguars and particularly the X100 is a beautiful and complicated machine and as such it requires forsight type maintenance, changing the oil and filters before it's due, replacing the pads, before they score the rotors, etc., is the way to prolong life in these cars. I've had them all from my first v8 daimler to the x100 4.2.
 
The following users liked this post:
Jeagar (02-20-2018)
  #137  
Old 02-20-2018, 02:29 AM
phanc60844's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: knypersley
Posts: 463
Received 133 Likes on 108 Posts
Default

'the X100 is a beautiful and complicated machine and as such it requires forsight type maintenance, changing the oil and filters before it's due, replacing the pads, before they score the rotors, etc'

no different to any other car really?

I think that most of you have missed real point here. we are talking about, in some cases, cars that are over 20 years old. Would you really expect not to have any issues? the real problem here is that its an expensive car from a luxury manufacturer and as such, servicing and spares are really expensive. so you get some footballer buying the car from new, it gets pampered, no expense spared, then it gets traded in. With each change of owner you get progressively owners who really cant afford to look after them. Services get missed, items that need replacement will get left if the car actually runs. Then you have the compounded effect that the cars are quite poor on fuel efficiency, so they dont get run enough. That leads to issues with electronics, dampness affecting electrical systems and flat battery issues. Really, there are no real surprises in any issues that arise with these cars that have been posted on this forum. if you dont believe me then take a look on a Mercedes or BMW forum on cars that are of this age and they tell a similar tale. if you want reliability then get a new or nearly new car, but they will be exactly the same in 20 years time, if they even make that age.
 
  #138  
Old 02-20-2018, 04:26 AM
Jeagar's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 353
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by phanc60844
'the X100 is a beautiful and complicated machine and as such it requires forsight type maintenance, changing the oil and filters before it's due, replacing the pads, before they score the rotors, etc'

no different to any other car really?
Not really. It is different. I have already given the example of the 15-17 years old Astras we run with no major issues at all. I also have friends who own 70's German Fords which they run as daily drivers the whole year besides the salty months with no real issues. With those you do have to watch out for rust. But mechanically and especially electrically they are solid! And they are now about 45 years old. Age is no excuse for reliability. If it's reliable from new it will continue to be reliable and will even take a certain amount of abusing and neglect before it finally gives. But some cars are divas and will take nothing but pampering. Those are the cars which pick up unreliable reputations.

Originally Posted by phanc60844
I think that most of you have missed real point here. we are talking about, in some cases, cars that are over 20 years old. Would you really expect not to have any issues??
Again, it doesn't have to be that way and proof of it is all over.

Originally Posted by phanc60844
the real problem here is that its an expensive car from a luxury manufacturer and as such, servicing and spares are really expensive. so you get some footballer buying the car from new, it gets pampered, no expense spared, then it gets traded in. With each change of owner you get progressively owners who really cant afford to look after them. Services get missed, items that need replacement will get left if the car actually runs. ?
Now you have touched on the core problem, not only with the X100 but any expensive luxury car, which is one of the reasons they depreciate so much.

Originally Posted by phanc60844
Then you have the compounded effect that the cars are quite poor on fuel efficiency, so they dont get run enough. That leads to issues with electronics, dampness affecting electrical systems and flat battery issues. Really, there are no real surprises in any issues that arise with these cars that have been posted on this forum. if you dont believe me then take a look on a Mercedes or BMW forum on cars that are of this age and they tell a similar tale. if you want reliability then get a new or nearly new car, but they will be exactly the same in 20 years time, if they even make that age.
While I agree with you about other Mercedes and especially BMWs having problems, just check a BMW 8 series forum for similar horror stories, this does not excuse the X100 and neither proves that every single older car is that way. I know somebody who did everything in his power to kill a Toyota and never could. Long story.

And as pointed out in the thread, the problems with the X100 are not only related to age. It's mainly related to bad engineering decisions which compromised the car. Had those stupid decision not been made the car would be much more reliable and most likely not have the reputation. I think blaming it on age alone is a cop-out.

Having said all that, when I started this thread I was interested in buying a X100. Now I have pretty much decided I want one and will be looking for the right car. Either a XK8 or XKR. Not being very strict about that. It just needs to be the right car and for the right price. But I'm buying one fully aware of the headaches and I'm expecting the worst. If it turns out not to be a nightmare I will be pleasantly surprised and happy. I really like the way it looks and they way it drives. It has a real sense of occasion both from the outside and form driving it. I truly love it. Friends are already calling me crazy and throwing bankruptcy jokes around. But I'm in love with the car. I hope I will survive.
 
  #139  
Old 02-20-2018, 08:16 AM
Doug's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest USA
Posts: 24,932
Received 10,990 Likes on 7,217 Posts
Default

How do we define "reliable", anyway?

Hate to get too far into the weeds but since we're already 130-140 postings into the discussion.....

I've owned several Jags, been driving 'em for 20+ years. Each one has been utterly reliable. That is, I've never been left by the side of the road. I've found that I can rely upon them to transport me to and fro. That obviously isn't the same as 'trouble-free'. I've never owned a car that was trouble-free. The repair histories on my two Hondas, for example, if placed side by side to the histories of my various Jags, have a lot in common. Head gaskets, assorted electrical problems, wheel bearings, calipers, radiator replacement, suspension bushings, and so forth.

Lots of people report that their xxx-car has been trouble free and boast that they 'never have to make repairs'. In my experience, that's almost always a case of being unaware that problems exist or simply not caring to have them repaired. Every used car I've ever bought needed a variety of repairs. Lots of people just don't notice or care if a wheel bearing is noisy, if various electrical gizmos have failed, if the suspension is clunking, etc. The car soldiers on, utterly "reliable".

People, including me, are often fussier about a special car like a Jag. They usually want everything to be 'just so'.....which inevitably means more entries into the repair logbook. My Honda needs several repairs at the moment...but I really don't care too much. It's just an appliance. If my Jag needs something, it gets done...pronto.

Cheers
DD
 

Last edited by Doug; 02-20-2018 at 08:41 AM.
The following users liked this post:
NBCat (02-20-2018)
  #140  
Old 02-20-2018, 08:21 AM
Doug's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest USA
Posts: 24,932
Received 10,990 Likes on 7,217 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jeagar
. I know somebody who did everything in his power to kill a Toyota and never could. Long story.

.
Lots of cars refuse to die.

My guess is that the story has more to do with durability than reliability. Two very different things, often confused!

Cheers
DD
 


Quick Reply: What is it which makes the X100 so unreliable?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:19 AM.