XK8 / XKR ( X100 ) 1996 - 2006

XKR-R, The car Jaguar should have built.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 08-02-2023, 09:54 PM
JagRag's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,165
Received 284 Likes on 171 Posts
Default XKR-R, The car Jaguar should have built.

XKR-R, The car Jaguar should have built.

 
The following users liked this post:
dfbender (08-03-2023)
  #2  
Old 08-02-2023, 11:40 PM
tomfurie's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Downers Grove, IL
Posts: 249
Received 33 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Great video, with more content to come.
 
  #3  
Old 08-03-2023, 06:04 AM
JACKP's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: Elkin N.C.
Posts: 236
Received 70 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

I agree, reliability would go way up.

Jack
 
  #4  
Old 08-03-2023, 06:57 AM
Rishi's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2022
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 275
Received 156 Likes on 89 Posts
Default

Interesting question though. Is it really a Jag? Without doubt a great car, good performance and great looks but not really a GT anymore?
 
  #5  
Old 08-03-2023, 09:51 AM
Jon89's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 12,635
Received 4,390 Likes on 2,866 Posts
Default

I applaud the concept, but at 6-foot-7 with size 15 feet there is no way I would have anywhere close to enough legroom / kneeroom / footroom to be able to drive that car. The excessive heat inside the cabin would also be a major problem for those of us who are polar bears....
 

Last edited by Jon89; 08-03-2023 at 09:55 AM.
The following users liked this post:
Timeisrelative (08-06-2023)
  #6  
Old 08-03-2023, 01:41 PM
JACKP's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: Elkin N.C.
Posts: 236
Received 70 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

I don't believe it takes 60 to 70 HP to turn the automatic trans.

Jack
 
  #7  
Old 08-03-2023, 02:58 PM
Kuddlesworth's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 602
Received 187 Likes on 136 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JACKP
I don't believe it takes 60 to 70 HP to turn the automatic trans.

Jack
Neither do I, maybe with the older Merc unit like they had but not with the ZF 6 speed unit. It shouldn't be any different to a manual considering fuel economy is roughly what you would expect from a manual as thr transmission can lock up on all 6 gears.
 
  #8  
Old 08-04-2023, 04:47 PM
Stumpy's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Devon, UK
Posts: 548
Received 187 Likes on 129 Posts
Default

Old news! This conversion has been done several times, many years ago, both in Sweden 2014 https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/xk8-xkr-x100-17/xkr-manual-gearbox-124769/ and in the UK by the late Norman Durban. There was even an article about it in a UK motoring magazine
 
  #9  
Old 08-04-2023, 10:48 PM
giandanielxk8's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 3,530
Received 1,442 Likes on 772 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stumpy
Old news! This conversion has been done several times, many years ago, both in Sweden 2014 https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/xk8-xkr-x100-17/xkr-manual-gearbox-124769/ and in the UK by the late Norman Durban. There was even an article about it in a UK motoring magazine

Yes, the difference is that Swallows has developed a custom ECU that is plug-and-play and allows manual transmissions without losing CAN bus functionality or having the Christmas tree of lights in the dashboard. It will also allow remapping. This car is one of the test-beds for this ECU, which they apparently have intentions of making available to the public. That's a big deal.
 
  #10  
Old 08-05-2023, 05:05 AM
dibbit's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Spain
Posts: 1,314
Received 516 Likes on 371 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kuddlesworth
Neither do I, maybe with the older Merc unit like they had but not with the ZF 6 speed unit. It shouldn't be any different to a manual considering fuel economy is roughly what you would expect from a manual as thr transmission can lock up on all 6 gears.
Except both the 4.0 and 4.2 XKR have identical 0-60 times, despite the extra 200cc on the car with the ZF gearbox.

It's all academic anyway, as very few of us are crazy enough to flog our 20 year old cars to within an inch of their lives, just to get the kind of performances the test drivers were achieving when the cars were new.
 
The following 2 users liked this post by dibbit:
JimmyL (08-05-2023), michaelh (08-05-2023)
  #11  
Old 08-05-2023, 07:08 AM
NorXKR's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Lena, Norway
Posts: 265
Received 161 Likes on 91 Posts
Default

Sadly Mike Fernie do not know what he is talking about. A manual transmission swap will not give you any more HP in the ENGINE. At the wheels yes, in the engine no. It could have been interesting to know the difference at the wheels with auto vs manual, but when you at the same time swap out the ECU with a better tune AND the pulleys for the supercharger to get higher boost - that is where the power gain is.
It has nothing to do with the "heavy converter". And BTW the MB gearbox also has lock up.

Swallows has done a god job, hopefully they can come up with a tune even if you want to keep the auto.
 
  #12  
Old 08-05-2023, 10:40 AM
Kuddlesworth's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 602
Received 187 Likes on 136 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NorXKR
Sadly Mike Fernie do not know what he is talking about. A manual transmission swap will not give you any more HP in the ENGINE. At the wheels yes, in the engine no. It could have been interesting to know the difference at the wheels with auto vs manual, but when you at the same time swap out the ECU with a better tune AND the pulleys for the supercharger to get higher boost - that is where the power gain is.
It has nothing to do with the "heavy converter". And BTW the MB gearbox also has lock up.

Swallows has done a god job, hopefully they can come up with a tune even if you want to keep the auto.
I think they said it was a 50hp uplift with all the work they did which to me sounds about what I would expect and what people have said you get from the smaller pulley. 80hp increase with the filter taken off.
 
  #13  
Old 08-05-2023, 05:17 PM
JimmyL's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 1,787
Received 417 Likes on 308 Posts
Default

It's a fun video. Especially if you like X100s. I think I like it better than the Barbie Movie. (a lot shorter too)
 
The following 2 users liked this post by JimmyL:
Burnham (08-15-2023), dfbender (08-07-2023)
  #14  
Old 08-06-2023, 08:17 PM
Timeisrelative's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 788
Received 286 Likes on 183 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jon89
I applaud the concept, but at 6-foot-7 with size 15 feet there is no way I would have anywhere close to enough legroom / kneeroom / footroom to be able to drive that car. The excessive heat inside the cabin would also be a major problem for those of us who are polar bears....
Yep Id never be able to drive mine as a manual either. About an inch shorter than you, still have 15 4E feet though. Oh and like ive said before, Im built like a linebacker weighing in at about 365lbs lol
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Turko
F-Type ( X152 )
45
04-21-2022 05:50 PM
vdpnyc
Other Jaguar Models / Concepts / Replicas
0
05-01-2016 04:00 PM
yidal8
XF and XFR ( X250 )
5
10-11-2012 12:17 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: XKR-R, The car Jaguar should have built.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:17 AM.